- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Epstein legislation will be amended in the senate to fix national security concerns
Posted on 11/18/25 at 11:51 am
Posted on 11/18/25 at 11:51 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
JUST IN: Speaker Johnson announces the Epstein legislation will be AMENDED in the U.S. Senate because of errors in the original bill that the sponsors refuse to change. x.com/i/status/19908…
"The Senate can correct it."
So it will have to pass the Senate, then go back to the House.
Several of the concerns are regarding national security and safeguards for victims.
6
Posted on 11/18/25 at 11:52 am to hawgfaninc
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Speaker Mike Johnson claims the Epstein files can’t be released unredacted because they contain intelligence-agency material that falls under national security.
He says it’s dangerous to force the DOJ to declassify documents they didn’t create, especially when they involve other agencies like the CIA or NSA.
Johnson warns that releasing the Epstein files unredacted would put national security at risk.
This post was edited on 11/18/25 at 11:53 am
Posted on 11/18/25 at 11:54 am to hawgfaninc
Why do the Epstein files contain intelligence agency material in the first place...
This government wants to classify everything it possibly can, which was not the intention of the classification system...
This government wants to classify everything it possibly can, which was not the intention of the classification system...
Posted on 11/18/25 at 11:56 am to hawgfaninc
National Security did you say?
Another conspiracy win... All a Conspiracy Theory really is, is tomorrow's news, today.
Another conspiracy win... All a Conspiracy Theory really is, is tomorrow's news, today.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 11:58 am to The Maj
Adnan Khashoggi
Posted on 11/18/25 at 11:59 am to hawgfaninc
Wow who could have seen this coming?
JFK anyone?
JFK anyone?
Posted on 11/18/25 at 12:02 pm to Padme
quote:
Wow who could have seen this coming?
I dunno how jew did nazi this coming...
Posted on 11/18/25 at 12:14 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Johnson warns that releasing the Epstein files unredacted would put national security at risk.
Isn't this the same reasoning they use to not release info on Thomas Crooks?
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:06 pm to hawgfaninc
This arguably could decide if the released files are something or a nothing burger
It’ll effect their impact
It’ll effect their impact
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:09 pm to hawgfaninc
Thune stated they aren’t amending anything
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:18 pm to Mushroom1968
Interesting. Kinda hope you’re right. Even though I can see the need for an amendment. Have a link?
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:20 pm to hawgfaninc
Not a link yet but being retweeted by quite a few.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:22 pm to Mushroom1968
Posted on 11/18/25 at 4:26 pm to The Maj
quote:
This government wants to classify everything it possibly can, which was not the intention of the classification system...
Meanwhile, government wants to know everything about you and I. We allow it for some odd reason.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 5:37 pm to The Maj
quote:
Why do the Epstein files contain intelligence agency material in the first place...
My hunch for the last few years: Epstein was an asset for various global intelligence agencies. His whole sex trafficking in particularly disgusting ways was about getting leverage on political and business leaders.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 5:53 am to Diego Ricardo
quote:
Epstein was an asset for various global intelligence agencies.
A simpler and more likely scenario is he was not an asset for intelligence agencies and the folks in our government want the information classified because of who the information can hurt...
Not saying he wasn't an asset but if you look at the congressional slush fund for paying off sexual harassment claims, it is classified and should be made public annually... They protect the information that protects them...
Posted on 11/19/25 at 6:00 am to The Maj
quote:
Not saying he wasn't an asset
He absolutely was. He had been working for MOSSAD for a long time. He referred to himself as a political bounty hunter.
There are legitimate reasons why the government would be worried for national security reasons in all of this. I mean, I don't give a shite and I doubt anyone here does either really, but the dude didn't just get leverage on American Presidents. He got foreign presidents and monarchs as well.
I say frick the bastards no matter what country they're from. Let it all come out.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 6:04 am to Diego Ricardo
quote:
My hunch for the last few years: Epstein was an asset for various global intelligence agencies. His whole sex trafficking in particularly disgusting ways was about getting leverage on political and business leaders.
As this goes on it seems to be more than Epstein was kind of given a long leash with the sex stuff because he was an asset on financing and arms deals, more than it was an actual honey pot operation targeting pols. The only real person outside of JE that we have any evidence of participating in the underage sex stuff is Prince Andrew, who has no value in a leverage scenario.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 6:08 am to hawgfaninc
They want to hide and limit any more Clinton and Prince Andrew exposure.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News