- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Oversight Committee Drops Epstein receipts
Posted on 11/17/25 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 11/17/25 at 1:16 pm
Let's start with former AG Bill Barr.
Democrats claimed "Barr could not clear Trump of wrongdoing" after his deposition.
What did Barr actually say?
That there was NO evidence, and that if SDNY had anything on Trump, they would've indicted him.
They didn't.
Then came Alexander Acosta.
Democrats tried to smear Trump by linking him to Epstein via the 2007 case.
But Acosta crushed their narrative.
He testified that he never spoke, emailed, or had ANY contact with Trump about Epstein.
So what did Democrats do?
They leaked 3 cherry-picked emails out of 23,000 pages—then made their own redactions to hide exonerating facts.
One name they blacked out? Virginia Giuffre.
Why? Because she publicly said she NEVER saw Trump do anything wrong.
Another Democrat redaction for their hoax?
Prince Andrew.
Why? Because the redacted context changes the email.
They were fabricating a smear campaign, not telling the truth.
Then they lied about who did the redactions.
Rep. Crockett and others went on CNN pretending they had no idea who made the edits.
CNN corrected them live, saying Democrats made the redactions.
We released everything. 23,000 pages.
Suddenly, the same Democrats who spent months screaming "release the files" told the NYT that doing so was meant to "disorient" and "distract."
So much for transparency!
Then the fake and dishonest NYT quietly edited their piece, removing the word "disorient" with no editor's note.
They are literally helping Democrats rewrite history after their hoax fell apart.
Disinformation in real time.
But here's what no one is talking about...
In 2019, Democrat @StaceyPlaskett was texting with Jeffrey Epstein during an actual House hearing.
Epstein helped Plaskett question a discredited witness who hated Trump. None other than Michael Cohen.
While Plaskett worked with Epstein to attack Trump, Democrats now want you to believe they care about the victims?
They don't.
They ignored Clinton's connections, buried exculpatory facts, and made targeted redactions to select documents to smear President Trump.
Shameful.
The New York Post front page said it best:
"DIRTY CLICKS."
The Epstein 'bombshell' blew up in their faces.
23,000 pages prove it was another Dem hoax, buried by media allies trying to bail them out. LINK
Democrats claimed "Barr could not clear Trump of wrongdoing" after his deposition.
What did Barr actually say?
That there was NO evidence, and that if SDNY had anything on Trump, they would've indicted him.
They didn't.
Then came Alexander Acosta.
Democrats tried to smear Trump by linking him to Epstein via the 2007 case.
But Acosta crushed their narrative.
He testified that he never spoke, emailed, or had ANY contact with Trump about Epstein.
So what did Democrats do?
They leaked 3 cherry-picked emails out of 23,000 pages—then made their own redactions to hide exonerating facts.
One name they blacked out? Virginia Giuffre.
Why? Because she publicly said she NEVER saw Trump do anything wrong.
Another Democrat redaction for their hoax?
Prince Andrew.
Why? Because the redacted context changes the email.
They were fabricating a smear campaign, not telling the truth.
Then they lied about who did the redactions.
Rep. Crockett and others went on CNN pretending they had no idea who made the edits.
CNN corrected them live, saying Democrats made the redactions.
We released everything. 23,000 pages.
Suddenly, the same Democrats who spent months screaming "release the files" told the NYT that doing so was meant to "disorient" and "distract."
So much for transparency!
Then the fake and dishonest NYT quietly edited their piece, removing the word "disorient" with no editor's note.
They are literally helping Democrats rewrite history after their hoax fell apart.
Disinformation in real time.
But here's what no one is talking about...
In 2019, Democrat @StaceyPlaskett was texting with Jeffrey Epstein during an actual House hearing.
Epstein helped Plaskett question a discredited witness who hated Trump. None other than Michael Cohen.
While Plaskett worked with Epstein to attack Trump, Democrats now want you to believe they care about the victims?
They don't.
They ignored Clinton's connections, buried exculpatory facts, and made targeted redactions to select documents to smear President Trump.
Shameful.
The New York Post front page said it best:
"DIRTY CLICKS."
The Epstein 'bombshell' blew up in their faces.
23,000 pages prove it was another Dem hoax, buried by media allies trying to bail them out. LINK
Posted on 11/17/25 at 2:01 pm to Jbird
Only 4 downvotes Muh Epstein fellas you can do better!
Posted on 11/17/25 at 2:04 pm to Jbird
It’s Russia gate all over again.
The Dems are getting their asses kicked so they need something to attack Trump with.
A lot of useful idiots on the right are helping them.
The Dems are getting their asses kicked so they need something to attack Trump with.
A lot of useful idiots on the right are helping them.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 2:12 pm to Wolfhound45
Some of the Epstein crowd posting right now went 40 posts yesterday all on drumpf.
Oddly running silent today.
Oddly running silent today.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 2:15 pm to Jbird
I would fall into the Epstein crowd. I have wanted Trump to let this out long ago. But it shows how he knows how to play the long game better than I do. It is game on now.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 2:18 pm to Wolfhound45
Same here I would have dumped on these clowns before now
Posted on 11/17/25 at 2:21 pm to Jbird
Obama's Treasury Secretary Larry Summers is now on the chopping block as Elizabeth Warren is calling for his ouster from Harvard because he is on the Epstein list. 
Posted on 11/17/25 at 2:24 pm to MrLSU
Turning tables.
Meh he is expendable for dem cred.
Meh he is expendable for dem cred.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 2:28 pm to Jbird
I have read about the redaction of Virginia's name and the explanation for the "dog that didn't bark" line. Has there been an explanation of the "he knew about the girls" line?
Posted on 11/17/25 at 2:31 pm to TDTOM
He was the one that ratted them out no?
Posted on 11/17/25 at 2:36 pm to Jbird
quote:
Some of the Epstein crowd posting right now went 40 posts yesterday all on drumpf. Oddly running silent today.
SFP nowhere to be found in this thread
Posted on 11/17/25 at 2:36 pm to Jbird
I felt sorry for them so I helped them out. Imagine their sadness right now, their despair is real. Just a token of my disrespect for them.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 2:36 pm to thebigmuffaletta
Among others in the howler monkey class
Posted on 11/17/25 at 2:53 pm to Jbird
Democrats with every Trumk Gotcha!
Posted on 11/17/25 at 2:55 pm to Jbird
good post, jbird ….
from Trump’s first term:

Posted on 11/17/25 at 3:09 pm to cadillacattack
Still cracks me up
These fricks started 1412 threads
Today tumbleweeds
These fricks started 1412 threads
Today tumbleweeds
Posted on 11/17/25 at 3:25 pm to Jbird
This is why democrats and never-Trumpers never pushed to release the files during Biden’s term. There’s nothing negative or criminally there to tie Trump too.
As I repeatedly said….. the people who only started screaming about the Epstein files in May of this year, don’t care about the children, the victims, or justice. They only want to smear Trump and score political points as a way to obtain political power for leftist without having to make a policy case to the voters
As I repeatedly said….. the people who only started screaming about the Epstein files in May of this year, don’t care about the children, the victims, or justice. They only want to smear Trump and score political points as a way to obtain political power for leftist without having to make a policy case to the voters
This post was edited on 11/17/25 at 3:27 pm
Popular
Back to top

11







