- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Rhett Lashlee is the best candidate I have seen.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 11/1/25 at 3:24 pm
His in game coaching today was superb.
5
Posted on 11/1/25 at 3:25 pm to NAsh-vegas Tigah
He just signed a 7-year extension at SMU
Posted on 11/1/25 at 3:26 pm to SMU Tiger Fan
quote:
He just signed a 7-year extension at SMU
what’s the buyout if he leaves though? just that he signed an extension is meaningless if he can leave at any time for free.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 3:26 pm to NAsh-vegas Tigah
Well he’s probably not a candidate
Posted on 11/1/25 at 3:27 pm to NAsh-vegas Tigah
Fans are crazy reactionary to one game.
You’re hiring a CEO of your program.
You’re hiring a CEO of your program.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 3:27 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
meaningless if he can leave at any time for free.
People that get paid to make these deals are smarter than that.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 3:40 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
what’s the buyout if he leaves though? just that he signed an extension is meaningless if he can leave at any time for free.
Doesn't matter. SMU has more money than LSU.
It's the fact he signed the extension. It's a message that he isn't interested. It's pretty common knowledge that once a coach that is on the hot boards signs an extension with the school they are currently at, they are effectively letting everyone know they aren't interested in leaving.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 3:49 pm to Beef Supreme
quote:
People that get paid to make these deals are smarter than that.
not about smarts it’s about leverage
Posted on 11/1/25 at 3:50 pm to TigerGrad03
quote:
Doesn't matter. SMU has more money than LSU.
would SMU smash the current coaching pay structure to keep him? the LSU can’t afford it stuff is pretty dumb/tired
This post was edited on 11/1/25 at 4:19 pm
Posted on 11/1/25 at 4:06 pm to PorkSammich
Yep we must eliminate Sumrall after one game.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 4:49 pm to NAsh-vegas Tigah
Watches one game and says he’s the best candidate. Wonder if you’d say the same thing if you watched his 3 losses this season. Some of yall are hilarious
Posted on 11/1/25 at 4:56 pm to TigerGrad03
quote:
Doesn't matter. SMU has more money than LSU.
This always makes me laugh. SMU plays in a stadium with 30,000 people. Stanford has more money than any other non Ivy League school in the country. Why aren’t they any good on a consistent basis? It comes down to if Lashlee wants to compete at a high level for national championships or if he is satisfied with lesser results and lower expectations.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 4:58 pm to Sofaking2
Stanford doesn't spend on football. Every athlete, regardless of sport, gets a full ride. They have no NIL. That is vs SMU that is all in on football. Plus you can live in Dallas.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 5:04 pm to AUCE05
The point is SMU doesn’t have the money Stanford does. Stanford is flush with cash. Don’t tell me SMU is all in on football playing in front of 32,000 fans, lol.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News