- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
An Obama judge has ruled that the Trump admin must pay for SNAP during the shutdown
Posted on 10/31/25 at 2:00 pm
Posted on 10/31/25 at 2:00 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
BREAKING: An Obama judge just decided President Trump's administration is REQUIRED to pay SNAP benefits to Americans during the Schumer Shutdown
...the judge also ordered Trump to find money from somewhere else (I guess) if "contingency" funds aren't enough
Absolutely insane. The Democrats shut down SNAP, then they had a judge come in and decide to fund SNAP?
Just OPEN THE GOVERNMENT!
LINK
quote:
Two federal judges ruled nearly simultaneously on Friday that President Donald Trump’s administration must to continue to fund SNAP, the nation’s biggest food aid program, using contingency funds during the government shutdown.
The rulings came a day before the U.S. Department of Agriculture planned to freeze payments to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program because it said it could no longer keep funding it due to the shutdown.
The program serves about 1 in 8 Americans and is a major piece of the nation’s social safety net. Word in October that it would be a Nov. 1 casualty of the shutdown sent states, food banks and SNAP recipients scrambling to figure out how to secure food. Some states said they would spend their own funds to keep versions of the program going.
The program costs around $8 billion per month nationally.
Democratic state attorneys general or governors from 25 states, as well as the District of Columbia, challenged the plan to pause the program, contending that the administration has a legal obligation to keep it running in their jurisdictions.
The administration said it wasn’t allowed to use a contingency fund with about $5 billion in it for the program, which reversed a USDA plan from before the shutdown that said money would be tapped to keep SNAP running. The Democratic officials argued that not only could that money be used, it must be. They also said a separate fund with around $23 billion is available for the cause.
A federal judge in Rhode Island ruled from a bench that the program must be funded using at least the contingency funds – and asked for an update on progress by Monday.
A Massachusetts-based judge also gave the administration until Monday to say whether it would partially pay for the benefits for November with contingency money or fund them fully with additional funds
It wasn’t immediately clear how quickly the debit cards that beneficiaries use to buy groceries could be reloaded after the ruling. That process often takes one to two weeks.
The rulings are likely to face appeals.
This post was edited on 10/31/25 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 10/31/25 at 2:04 pm to hawgfaninc
Pull the funds from the DOJ I guess... Specifically the district of Rhode Island.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 2:07 pm to hawgfaninc
So stupid. The man just threatened to use the nuclear option to reopen the government. He obviously doesn't want people to not have food. Pure political theater.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 2:08 pm to chadau79
You knew they would fund the SNAP program, not ready for the riots if they don't
Posted on 10/31/25 at 2:20 pm to justjoe906
Dems doing their best to pin this on Trump.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 2:32 pm to hawgfaninc
The best summary of how retarded these decisions are comes from that twitter thread:

quote:
I’m going to sound stupid here probably. But how can the judicial branch order the executive branch to perform a legislative branch function?

Posted on 10/31/25 at 2:36 pm to hawgfaninc
Hell.. let’s go to Texas and find a judge to rule that the Dems need to vote to reopen the government.
I mean.. if the judicial branch is now the superior branch of government.
I mean.. if the judicial branch is now the superior branch of government.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 2:38 pm to hawgfaninc
DEMs trying to pin this on Trump.
This is the legislative branch’s problem…Schumer, we are waiting!
This is the legislative branch’s problem…Schumer, we are waiting!
This post was edited on 10/31/25 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 10/31/25 at 2:45 pm to HEtiger
quote:
Dems doing their best to pin this on Trump.
And the sad thing is, it’ll probably work. They are so far ahead as far as doing whatever it takes. GOP has no stomach for today’s zero-sum political game. It’ll cost us next week and likely next year.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 2:46 pm to hawgfaninc
Send SWAT frogmen to this activist judge's home and arrest.
They have zero authority to order the President of the United States of America to fund entitlements programs while the Democrats leave the government shut down in gridlock.
This lawfare and judge-overreach of the last few years has truly caused a Constitutional crisis. How many people still can't see how bad this shite has become?
They have zero authority to order the President of the United States of America to fund entitlements programs while the Democrats leave the government shut down in gridlock.
This lawfare and judge-overreach of the last few years has truly caused a Constitutional crisis. How many people still can't see how bad this shite has become?
Posted on 10/31/25 at 2:49 pm to hawgfaninc
Ministerial
Discretionary
These frickers dont know the difference.
Unless there's a constitutional right to free shite I am not aware of.
Discretionary
These frickers dont know the difference.
Unless there's a constitutional right to free shite I am not aware of.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 2:50 pm to hawgfaninc
There has been no CR passed so there is no longer a SNAP program. Therefore no funds can be sent out
Posted on 10/31/25 at 2:51 pm to udtiger
I thought the Supreme Court said these judges can’t make these sweeping national injunctions/decisions anymore.
Just ignore it.
Just ignore it.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 2:52 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
the judge also ordered Trump to find money from somewhere else (I guess) if "contingency" funds aren't enough
Cutting off the pay of federal judges would be a good place to start.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 2:53 pm to HangmanPage1
Trump should fully pay the red states and give the scaps to the blue ones.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 2:57 pm to NytroBud
quote:
There has been no CR passed so there is no longer a SNAP program. Therefore no funds can be sent out
This is 100% the correct take. We are in FY 2026 now...there is no appropriation for SNAP. It does not exist until Congress appropriates money for such a program.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 3:02 pm to hawgfaninc
8 billion a month
I feel like an idiot working 6 days a week so I can buy groceries
I feel like an idiot working 6 days a week so I can buy groceries
Posted on 10/31/25 at 3:56 pm to udtiger
That’s a good idea. Fall in line, open the government, or else!
Popular
Back to top


15










