- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Senate votes to block Trump’s tariffs on Canada for a second time
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:49 pm
quote:
The Senate on Wednesday voted for a second time in as many days to knock down President Donald Trump’s tariffs — this time his duties on neighboring Canada.
The vote — the second of three votes on Trump’s tariffs scheduled for this week — passed 50-46, with four Republicans voting with the Democrats: Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Rand Paul of Kentucky. Collins, Murkowski and Paul were all cosponsors of the bill. The same four GOP senators voted for a resolution to block the tariffs on Brazilian goods Tuesday.
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/10/29/congress/senate-votes-to-block-trumps-tariffs-on-canada-for-a-second-time-00629068
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:52 pm to loogaroo
Not just Canada, globally. This stop his use of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. That means all his applied tariffs would not be valid.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:52 pm to loogaroo
Can they do this without it being a law? As in needing to be signed by the president?
Not including overriding a veto, which they clearly don't have the votes for.
Not including overriding a veto, which they clearly don't have the votes for.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:53 pm to loogaroo
Tell me when the House votes for this. This is just outing the RINOs and Swamp creatures, so far.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:54 pm to catholictigerfan
quote:
Can they do this without it being a law?
Not sure why they would need to create a new law
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:54 pm to loogaroo
Don’t you realize Rand Paul and Lisa Murkowski know what is best the country and economy?! Just ask them! Rand is still trying to figure out what his position on immigration is but he definitely understands complicated trade agreements. Apparently, every country on the planet can look out for its own interests except the US. We are supposed to gleefully accept other nations tariffs and quotas in the name of “free trade”
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:56 pm to Rip Torn
I originally read this and was not going to post but then I thought not only were they exposing the four Republicans who should be booted out of office but it is another reminder that every single Democrat votes in lockstep which we seem to forget from time to time on every single issue
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:56 pm to Rip Torn
Rand also wants to make sure we know the name of ever fisherman transporting fentanyl as well so we can investigate them before blowing them up.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:56 pm to Scream4LSU
quote:
This stop his use of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Does it though? Wouldn't the House have to pass it?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:57 pm to Powerman
quote:
Not sure why they would need to create a new law
If it is already the law, why do they need a (non-binding) resolution? This is already before the courts, no?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:58 pm to Ace Midnight
Sorry, yes, if the house passes as well, not currently. Just saying that would be the end result.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:02 pm to catholictigerfan
quote:
Can they do this without it being a law? As in needing to be signed by the president?
Not including overriding a veto, which they clearly don't have the votes for.
No, will not even be taken up by the House.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:07 pm to Scream4LSU
quote:
This stop his use of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. That means all his applied tariffs would not be valid.
Why do you say that?
If the law gives the President power to levy tariffs then the law would have to be changed requiring both chambers of Congress and he President's signature.
Does the law say the President does not have the power if and when the Senate votes to say he does not?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:33 pm to loogaroo
I'm getting sick of Rand Paul when he honestly used to be among my favorite politicians. He needs to seek counseling and therapy for his closet TDS.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 4:53 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
I'm getting sick of Rand Paul when he honestly used to be among my favorite politicians. He needs to seek counseling and therapy for his closet TDS.
I've not been following this closely, but I share your thoughts about his recent exploits. No understand but not like it.
Popular
Back to top

7











