- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Judge says Greenpeace must pay $345 million in pipeline lawsuit, cutting jury amount
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:45 am
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:45 am
quote:
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A North Dakota judge has ordered Greenpeace to pay damages of $345 million, reducing an earlier jury award after it found the environmental group and related entities liable for defamation and other claims in connection with protests of an oil pipeline nearly a decade ago.
The new amount is roughly half the $667 million that a jury had awarded to the pipeline company that brought the claims, Dallas-based Energy Transfer and subsidiary Dakota Access.
The case stems from protests in 2016 and 2017 against the Dakota Access oil pipeline and its crossing of the Missouri River near the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s reservation.
Greenpeace had asked state District Judge James Gion to rule in its favor on the claims against it, with mixed results. In granting the request to some claims, the judge said he had no evidence to review or that the damages were duplicative. In denying others, he said the evidence could lead a jury to reasonably make such findings. He limited certain damages and disallowed several claims.
Energy Transfer said it intends to appeal “as we firmly believe that the original jury findings and damages awards for conspiracy and defamation are lawful and just.”
Greenpeace, for its part, intends to seek a new trial and will appeal if denied, saying, “we still believe that the remaining claims are legally unfounded.” The group has said the lawsuit is meant to chill free speech and the right to protest.
LINK
Love that ETC is saying, “No, we want the full $667 Million.”
$345 MM or $667 MM, I just love that these Greenpeace jackholes with all their fricking around are now finally finding out. They’ve cost companies and taxpayers money with their antics over the past couple decades.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:52 am to ragincajun03
These people thought the egregious Alex Jones settlement would never come back to bite them.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:00 am to ragincajun03
Why not 100 trillion? It's not like they'll ever get anywhere close to that amount now that USAID is cut off.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:33 am to ragincajun03
Give 'em the $667 mil. I have stock in ET.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:38 am to ragincajun03
You can either shoot terrorists or bankrupt them. Good on ETP.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:49 am to upgrayedd
quote:
These people thought the egregious Alex Jones settlement would never come back to bite them.
That’s been shown it was just a DOJ takedown.
They wanted him off the air so they sued him into oblivion and made sure any settlement included him losing his company.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:53 am to forkedintheroad
quote:
Why not 100 trillion? It's not like they'll ever get anywhere close to that amount now that USAID is cut off.
I was gonna say, does Greenpeace have anywhere close to that kind of money?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:02 pm to CocomoLSU
quote:
does Greenpeace have anywhere close to that kind of money?
Absolutely not. But if they raise a dime again from Soros or anyone else, it should go straight into ETC’s pocket. Should also be a message to other protesters and groups…protest all you want, but damage to property will not be tolerated.
Popular
Back to top
5









