- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
There is a big fight on X about Josh Hammer calling for Tucker to be “neutralized”.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:29 pm
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:29 pm
Probably not the proper verb usage just off the heels of the Charlie Kirk assassination. Could have used “neutered”, “sidelined”, “ostracized”, “excommunicated”, etc.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:31 pm to GumboPot
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:32 pm to GumboPot
Can we give the hyperbolic headlines a rest?
And can we also quit promoting this Nick Fuentes fig?
And can we also quit promoting this Nick Fuentes fig?
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:34 pm to GumboPot
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:35 pm to Riverside
This is about Tucker and Josh. Not Nick.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:36 pm to GumboPot
Josh Hammer is a legal scholar and former federal law clerk. If he wanted to euphemistically call for the death of Tucker Carlson, he would have used a different word. Neutralize does not mean or connote killing or death.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:39 pm to Riverside
I like Nick Fuentes. You probably believe he is "toxic" because the propaganda worked on you. Nick's interview with Tucker was very informative. What are not supposed to watch Nick Fuentes because a certain tribe gets their panties in a twist?
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:41 pm to Riverside
quote:
Josh Hammer is a legal scholar and former federal law clerk. If he wanted to euphemistically call for the death of Tucker Carlson, he would have used a different word. Neutralize does not mean or connote killing or death.
Normally this kind of word usage would not ring alarm bells. However the day before Charlie”s assassination Josh retweeted this:
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:43 pm to Neutral Underground
My view of Fuentes is informed by his statements and actions toward President Trump and the other absolutely bat shite crazy theories he’s espoused.
Once Fuentes started actively campaigning against President Trump last November, I decided he needed to be “neutralized” from ever being associated with MAGA.
Once Fuentes started actively campaigning against President Trump last November, I decided he needed to be “neutralized” from ever being associated with MAGA.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:44 pm to Riverside
Can you please stop promoting Fuentes. Thanks.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:45 pm to GumboPot
Just admit that you don’t like Josh because he’s part of the tribe.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:49 pm to Riverside
In the interview with Tucker. Fuentes said that he told Trump that he would "Die for him." at the Mar-a-lago dinner. He also spoke very highly about Trump
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:51 pm to Riverside
quote:
Just admit that you don’t like Josh because he’s part of the tribe.
My first introduction to Josh was in July this summer when Dave Smith embarrassed him on the TPUSA stage. I don’t know much about him other than working for Newsweek.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:53 pm to Neutral Underground
And yet last November, when our choices were Trump or societal collapse, this is what Nick said:
quote:
"At the Trump rallies they're yelling 'trash for Trump, trash for Trump," Fuentes said on Friday, adding that some attendees have even started dressing up as trash.
quote:
"That was the moment when I realized Trumpism was a cult, that was the moment when I realized liberals are right. That was the moment when I realized it has gone too far, it is Frankenstein's monster, we've created a Gollum. It is a problem."
He said, "It is a cult," later referring to Trumpism as "a giant cult-like scam." Fuentes noted that there is a "slavish devotion of the [Trump] followers, they'll just eat up anything."
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:57 pm to GumboPot
quote:
I don’t know much about him other than working for Newsweek.
Trust me when I tell you, Josh Hammer has done more to advance the cause of liberty and freedom than most. He was a law clerk for Judge James Ho and assisted in authoring some very important legal decisions that protected religious liberty and pushed back against the regulatory state.
James Ho should be on Trump’s short list for SCOTUS if Thomas retires.
This post was edited on 10/29/25 at 11:58 pm
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:26 am to GumboPot
Josh Hammer is just the worst
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:59 am to Riverside
quote:
Can we give the hyperbolic headlines a rest?
And can we also quit promoting this Nick Fuentes fig?
The interview of him with Tucker should be watched by every single Israeli propagandists out there. He laid out step by step how they created him.
And his experience was 100% the truth and genuine because it's what most people experience the moment they question the actions of Israel. You get labeled things like antisemitic when you know it's not true, and it just kills peoples opinions on Israel.
It's the same identity shite as being called racist for questioning Obama.
He goes too far with "Jews" and that's why I don't listen to him. But Tucker did a great job pushing back on that and correctly pointed out the ignorant collectivism and identity politics.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 4:56 am to GumboPot
I agree with some of Fuentes diagnosis of various cultural and foreign policy issues , but my main issues with Fuentes are the following:
1) He has a tendency to flat out lie or heavily embellish certain stories
2) He has a whole catalog of him on video saying completely vile, deranged, and retarded things. I have no idea if it’s part of some “shock jockey, inside humor thing”, so maybe someone from the outside like me doesn’t get it, but if his idea is to promote his message it doesn’t make sense to also say some of his shite
3) He just seems really weird on a personal level. I get his issues with women and marriage, but he takes a really autistic and nihilistic view on the subject. His whole political agenda just seems kind of nihilistic
4) Comes off too hateful to Jewish people simply for being Jews. I have no issue with calling out Israel and our relationship, etc. But he seems to take it to the next level
1) He has a tendency to flat out lie or heavily embellish certain stories
2) He has a whole catalog of him on video saying completely vile, deranged, and retarded things. I have no idea if it’s part of some “shock jockey, inside humor thing”, so maybe someone from the outside like me doesn’t get it, but if his idea is to promote his message it doesn’t make sense to also say some of his shite
3) He just seems really weird on a personal level. I get his issues with women and marriage, but he takes a really autistic and nihilistic view on the subject. His whole political agenda just seems kind of nihilistic
4) Comes off too hateful to Jewish people simply for being Jews. I have no issue with calling out Israel and our relationship, etc. But he seems to take it to the next level
Popular
Back to top

16






