- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Loomis is the Root Problem /
Posted on 10/19/25 at 6:04 pm
Posted on 10/19/25 at 6:04 pm
His record without Coach SP is now 57-80. That's 23 games BELOW .500.
Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is...
Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is...
7
Posted on 10/19/25 at 7:08 pm to HotBoudin
Ok. Do the same thing with Mickey before and after Brees. It wasn’t CSP it was the Hall of Fame QB.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 10:37 am to BigPerm30
Correct. Look at Belichick without Brady. While coaching is important, the right QB is more important.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 10:47 am to HotBoudin
quote:
His record without Coach SP is now 57-80. That's 23 games BELOW .500.
This makes no sense. Loomis isn't coaching or on the field. This is dumb. Now if you want to talk about how he fricked up the cap, hired DA, and we can't get talent because of it, that's fine.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 11:09 am to saintsfan1977
It’s his record too because he hand picked the coaches and players. He was the one who fricked countless drafts, cap and put this team together.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:12 pm to The Hurricane
quote:
It’s his record too
The shite yall come up with.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:02 pm to whodat22
quote:You think Rattler is the root problem of this team? Come back when you understand football.
And rattler. He sucks
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:37 pm to NOSHAU
quote:
You think Rattler is the root problem of this team? Come back when you understand football.
Understand football very well and he's absolutely one of the many root problems of this team.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:37 pm to HotBoudin
well...........duh
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:48 pm to LSUpelsSaints
quote:
Understand football very well and he's absolutely one of the many root problems of this team.
He's waaay down the list if you understand football.
If you understood it you'd know that a 5th rd QB on this roster is the least of our problems.
You have to start with the year Brees retired and look at what got us here. It's not a fricking 5th rd QB that got us to where we are. It's bad decisions and the absolute worst drafting you can imagine. A QB in the 5th rd is doing what he can. It's not good enough to overcome 7 years of bad management and letting talent go elsewhere to sign oft injured players and drafting McDonald's employees.
Now do you understand?
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:58 pm to saintsfan1977
Yea, dipshit, I do understand. We are starting a 5th rd pick at QB. His name could be Rattler, his name could be Santa Claus, that's a root problem.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 2:00 pm to LSUpelsSaints
quote:
Yea, dipshit, I do understand. We are starting a 5th rd pick at QB. His name could be Rattler, his name could be Santa Claus, that's a root problem.
No you fricking don't. But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. What QB can we get right fricking now that wins games with this pathetic excuse for a football team? I'll hang up and listen.......
Posted on 10/20/25 at 2:02 pm to saintsfan1977
Well considering you reached with the 40th pick for one and you're currently 1-6, probably can't hurt to trot him out there to see, considering you'll have likely a top 3 pick in this upcoming draft
Posted on 10/20/25 at 2:14 pm to LSUpelsSaints
quote:
Well considering you reached with the 40th pick for one and you're currently 1-6, probably can't hurt to trot him out there to see, considering you'll have likely a top 3 pick in this upcoming draft
And that top 3 pick should NOT be used on a QB.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 2:21 pm to LSUpelsSaints
I'm still waiting for you to answer the question
Posted on 10/20/25 at 2:30 pm to saintsfan1977
The answer is probably would take a hall of famer at this point, but you seem to have reading comprehension problems. I didn't say Rattler being our QB was "the" root problem. I said he's one of "many" of the root problems.
And I also could give a shite at this point about winning games. You're 1-6, season is over. I think anyone can see Rattler is not ever going to be the franchise QB. Yea, he's played decent at times and is far from our biggest issue, but lacks any consistency and does a pretty terrible job of reading the entirety of the field. He's a solid backup NFL QB that can probably spot start for you in a pinch.
What is the drawback of putting Shough in at this point in time? We might lose games? Well we're doing that already with Rattler anyway, so what difference does it make. We've never seen Shough play in an NFL game before, so I think it would be nice to see what you might have there before you go into this next draft.
And Loomis is also not the root problem either...... Gayle is.
And I also could give a shite at this point about winning games. You're 1-6, season is over. I think anyone can see Rattler is not ever going to be the franchise QB. Yea, he's played decent at times and is far from our biggest issue, but lacks any consistency and does a pretty terrible job of reading the entirety of the field. He's a solid backup NFL QB that can probably spot start for you in a pinch.
What is the drawback of putting Shough in at this point in time? We might lose games? Well we're doing that already with Rattler anyway, so what difference does it make. We've never seen Shough play in an NFL game before, so I think it would be nice to see what you might have there before you go into this next draft.
And Loomis is also not the root problem either...... Gayle is.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 2:40 pm to LSUpelsSaints
quote:
The answer is probably would take a hall of famer at this point
Not happening chief.
quote:I agree with you there.
And I also could give a shite at this point about winning games. You're 1-6, season is over. I think anyone can see Rattler is not ever going to be the franchise QB. Yea, he's played decent at times and is far from our biggest issue, but lacks any consistency and does a pretty terrible job of reading the entirety of the field. He's a solid backup NFL QB that can probably spot start for you in a pinch.
quote:The knock on him was his folding under pressure. I don't think Moore wants his QB to become David Carr. We'll get to see him when we are playing the likes of Miami and Tennessee and Atlanta.
What is the drawback of putting Shough in at this point in time? We might lose games? Well we're doing that already with Rattler anyway, so what difference does it make. We've never seen Shough play in an NFL game before, so I think it would be nice to see what you might have there before you go into this next draft.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 4:14 pm to HotBoudin
quote:
Loomis is the Root Problem
When did you come to this conclusion?
Posted on 10/20/25 at 4:39 pm to HotBoudin
quote:
Loomis is the Root Problem
The owner is the root problem. Pretending it is Loomis hides the true root problem.
Loomis is in fact a problem as well. He's exists as a problem because the owner has no ability to identify operational problems. And, even if she could, she has no ability to fix them.
The roster is a multi-year product of this disfunction. The head coach situation (both the outgoing disaster) and the incoming (still yet to be determined) is a product of the disfunction as well.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News