- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hegseth sends goodbye emoji to news outlets protesting press policy
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:31 am
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:31 am
I like Pete more every day…
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Monday derided media outlets that said their reporters would not sign the Pentagon’s restrictive new press policy, using a goodbye handwave emoji in responding to social media posts announcing their decisions.
The Associated Press, Reuters, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, CNN and NPR have all said their journalists would not sign the new paperwork that says they will abide by or acknowledge they understand the new rules around Pentagon access. Many posted their statements on social media.
Hegseth responded to several such posts – including one made by The Atlantic, which said they “fundamentally oppose” the restrictions – with the goodbye emoji.
In May, Hegseth banned journalists from most hallways of the Pentagon without an official escort. The decision was considered extreme, as reporters had had access throughout much of the building for decades without being monitored. Secure or restricted spaces have always been off-limits to the press without official permission.
Now with the new Pentagon press policy, journalists are technically not barred from investigating, reporting or publishing stories on the U.S. military using information deemed sensitive or unclassified, but they could be deemed “a security or safety risk” should they even ask DOD personnel for such information, according to a draft of the rules.
The Pentagon describes solicitation as including calls for tips, encouraging military personnel to share non-public information, as many reporters do via their publications or personal social media platforms, as routine Defense Department news briefings are nonexistent.
Beat reporters now have until Tuesday to sign the new rules or give up their press passes by Wednesday. Editors and journalists have said they will continue to cover the U.S. military even without press credentials.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Monday derided media outlets that said their reporters would not sign the Pentagon’s restrictive new press policy, using a goodbye handwave emoji in responding to social media posts announcing their decisions.
The Associated Press, Reuters, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, CNN and NPR have all said their journalists would not sign the new paperwork that says they will abide by or acknowledge they understand the new rules around Pentagon access. Many posted their statements on social media.
Hegseth responded to several such posts – including one made by The Atlantic, which said they “fundamentally oppose” the restrictions – with the goodbye emoji.
In May, Hegseth banned journalists from most hallways of the Pentagon without an official escort. The decision was considered extreme, as reporters had had access throughout much of the building for decades without being monitored. Secure or restricted spaces have always been off-limits to the press without official permission.
Now with the new Pentagon press policy, journalists are technically not barred from investigating, reporting or publishing stories on the U.S. military using information deemed sensitive or unclassified, but they could be deemed “a security or safety risk” should they even ask DOD personnel for such information, according to a draft of the rules.
The Pentagon describes solicitation as including calls for tips, encouraging military personnel to share non-public information, as many reporters do via their publications or personal social media platforms, as routine Defense Department news briefings are nonexistent.
Beat reporters now have until Tuesday to sign the new rules or give up their press passes by Wednesday. Editors and journalists have said they will continue to cover the U.S. military even without press credentials.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:33 am to Placekicker
Good move by our Secretary of War!!
It always should've been this way.
It always should've been this way.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:35 am to Placekicker
Freedom of press doesn't mean, freedom of access.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:36 am to Placekicker
Another one of these policies that will be celebrated on here right now but when another administration takes over the same people will be screaming “but what are they hiding!!!???”
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:36 am to Placekicker
quote:
Editors and journalists have said they will continue to cover the U.S. military even without press credentials.
Oh no.. more anonymous sources familiar with people familiar with situations?
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:37 am to Placekicker
quote:Well stop leaking, frickheads
The decision was considered extreme, as reporters had had access throughout much of the building for decades without being monitored
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:37 am to lake chuck fan
What could have possibly been wrong with that ability to roam the halls freely ?
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:37 am to Placekicker
quote:
In May, Hegseth banned journalists from most hallways of the Pentagon without an official escort.
Ridiculous this was even happening in the first place...
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:39 am to Placekicker
quote:
The Associated Press, Reuters, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, CNN and NPR
Your free reign of loitering are over
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:39 am to BeeFense5
quote:
but when another administration takes over the same people will be screaming “but what are they hiding!!!???”
It’s not like they told us the truth anyway.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:40 am to BeeFense5
quote:
“but what are they hiding!!!???”
depends on what they are hiding -
If it's an Obama oriented bunch, we are in deep shite anyway and any information they 'released' would be red herrings anyway.
I'll take my chances with warriors at the spear point instead of college misfits.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:41 am to BeeFense5
quote:
“but what are they hiding!!!???”
A lot, nothing will change that.
The media has turned into propaganda.
There's some shite, I don't want/need to know about.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:45 am to FATBOY TIGER
quote:
Freedom of press doesn't mean, freedom of access.
It's funny how the 1st amendment gets misinterpreted constantly by the left.
You're free to say what you want without legal consequences. . . but consequences none the less.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:54 am to BeeFense5
quote:
Another one of these policies that will be celebrated on here right now but when another administration takes over the same people will be screaming “but what are they hiding!!!???
Im a right winger but I'm also not stupid. Right wing media is just as complicit as left wing media. Left wing just has a louder voice.
The bigger issue is not the press reporting/framing what's leaked, its the leakers themselves. This does nothing to stop them from initiating the call. In most cases I'd imagine the leaker is the initiator. With no leaker the press wouldn't know what to ask for.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:03 am to lsufanva
quote:Who needs calls when you share hallways
This does nothing to stop them from initiating the call
Unfettered arms length access to media is going to increase leaking relative to the opposite. This is basic
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:08 am to BeeFense5
I remember when a previous president fired all the generals and admirals that didn't agree with his way of thinking, and not a single judge said that he couldn't do it. I won"D"er why
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:12 am to Placekicker
quote:That is fricking insane. Even more so considering many, ABC at the top of the list, are on the Chicom payroll.
In May, Hegseth banned journalists from most hallways of the Pentagon without an official escort. The decision was considered extreme, as reporters had had access throughout much of the building for decades without being monitored. Secure or restricted spaces have always been off-limits to the press without official permission.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:35 am to BeeFense5
quote:What a take.
Another one of these policies that will be celebrated on here right now but when another administration takes over the same people will be screaming “but what are they hiding!!!???”
Many businesses have had this policy in place. If you come to mine, don't be surprised when you have to be escorted to the restroom - though your escort will stand outside.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:48 am to Placekicker
quote:
Editors and journalists have said they will continue to cover the U.S. military even without press credentials.
So basically saying they'll just keep making stuff up like they always have. They never needed facts or evidence before so why let this put a stop to all the lies.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 8:08 am to captainFid
In the company I worked for until retiring if you did not have a key card to enter, you had to be escorted. If you entered a stairwell w/o an escort, you could go down to exit the building, only. If you entered a floor from an elevator, then when you exit the elevator there would be doors requiring a key card to enter the floor. Employees only had access to certain floors based on their 'need to know' access privileges. The ITAR labs and data centers were off limits to non-citizens. Journalists were severely restricted to a showroom and meeting space. Guards were always present. Risk of intellectual theft was ever-present and we had many levels of safeguarding it.
Popular
Back to top

13










