- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
From Drain the Swamp to Selling Watches: What Happened to Trump’s Anti-Corruption Crusade?
Posted on 10/13/25 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 10/13/25 at 2:58 pm
One of the most potent themes of Donald Trump’s first presidential campaign was his critique of career politicians who quietly amassed wealth through public office. He cast Washington as a cesspool of corruption, where insiders enriched themselves while everyday Americans struggled. That message struck a chord with millions—including me. For the first time in years, someone was calling out the system for what it was: self-serving, opaque, and rigged.
Trump’s promise to “drain the swamp” wasn’t just a slogan—it was a rallying cry. He positioned himself as the outsider who couldn’t be bought, a billionaire immune to the temptations of political profiteering. His wealth, ironically, became a symbol of integrity. Many of his supporters embraced this narrative wholeheartedly, believing he would dismantle the machinery of corruption from the inside.
Fast forward to today, and that message has all but disappeared. In its place, we’re witnessing a level of financial self-enrichment that feels unprecedented—even brazen. Yes, politicians have long exploited their positions for personal gain, but they typically did so behind closed doors. Trump, who to his credit, championed transparency, seems to flaunt his profiteering in plain sight.
Even Ann Coulter, once one of Trump’s most vocal defenders at one time, has called this the most corrupt administration in American history.
Consider the evidence:
• The rollout of the Trump meme coin/NFTS just before his inauguration--the World Liberty Financial.
• Dinners for his new tech friends costing millions to attend
• A sitting president appearing in commercials to sell cheap “Trump” watches.
• A stock market that reacts to every Trump tweet—creating ripe opportunities for insider gains.
• A surge in foreign licensing deals for his real estate ventures ad golf courses
This isn’t just a departure from Trump’s original message—it’s a betrayal of it.
And that brings me to the question I genuinely want to ask: How does someone who once passionately supported the fight against political corruption reconcile this transformation? How do you square the promise of draining the swamp with the reality of what’s unfolding?
When Trump eventually leaves office, he may well be the wealthiest politician in American history—not because he built something new, but because he leveraged the presidency itself.
I’m not here to “own” anyone or throw insults. I’m sincerely trying to understand the mindset. How do you justify this shift? How do you process it?
Because if we can’t hold our own champions accountable, then what was the point of calling out corruption in the first place?
Trump’s promise to “drain the swamp” wasn’t just a slogan—it was a rallying cry. He positioned himself as the outsider who couldn’t be bought, a billionaire immune to the temptations of political profiteering. His wealth, ironically, became a symbol of integrity. Many of his supporters embraced this narrative wholeheartedly, believing he would dismantle the machinery of corruption from the inside.
Fast forward to today, and that message has all but disappeared. In its place, we’re witnessing a level of financial self-enrichment that feels unprecedented—even brazen. Yes, politicians have long exploited their positions for personal gain, but they typically did so behind closed doors. Trump, who to his credit, championed transparency, seems to flaunt his profiteering in plain sight.
Even Ann Coulter, once one of Trump’s most vocal defenders at one time, has called this the most corrupt administration in American history.
Consider the evidence:
• The rollout of the Trump meme coin/NFTS just before his inauguration--the World Liberty Financial.
• Dinners for his new tech friends costing millions to attend
• A sitting president appearing in commercials to sell cheap “Trump” watches.
• A stock market that reacts to every Trump tweet—creating ripe opportunities for insider gains.
• A surge in foreign licensing deals for his real estate ventures ad golf courses
This isn’t just a departure from Trump’s original message—it’s a betrayal of it.
And that brings me to the question I genuinely want to ask: How does someone who once passionately supported the fight against political corruption reconcile this transformation? How do you square the promise of draining the swamp with the reality of what’s unfolding?
When Trump eventually leaves office, he may well be the wealthiest politician in American history—not because he built something new, but because he leveraged the presidency itself.
I’m not here to “own” anyone or throw insults. I’m sincerely trying to understand the mindset. How do you justify this shift? How do you process it?
Because if we can’t hold our own champions accountable, then what was the point of calling out corruption in the first place?
Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:01 pm to The_Duke
quote:Comey was indicted and I suspect more indictments to come. He’s battling the swamp in courts all over the US.
How does someone who once passionately supported the fight against political corruption reconcile this transformation? How do you square the promise of draining the swamp with the reality of what’s unfolding?
This post was edited on 10/13/25 at 7:53 pm
Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:04 pm to The_Duke
Trump has spearheaded several MASSIVE changes which are draining the swamp:
1. Cutting USAID: this government agency was essentially codifying money laundering for connected politicos while paying journalists to report the agenda of the CIA . Trump destroyed it. As a result, the supply of taxpayer dollars being used to fund NGO’s used to agitate against the American people has been cut.
Trump has challenged the rules on firing agency officials resulting in multiple SCOTUS cases. It appears likely that SCOTUS is about to overturn nearly 80 years of precedent to greatly expand the power of the presidency to fire unaccountable bureaucrats who carry out their agenda regardless of whomever is president. Trump’s previous term consisted of agencies essentially ignoring appointed officials and actively opposing the White House. That’s about to end.
These aren’t just small changes, but massive ones. It is impossible to overstate just how much of your tax dollars were being spent ensuring that no matter who you voted for, government would carry on exactly the same. That will soon be over.
1. Cutting USAID: this government agency was essentially codifying money laundering for connected politicos while paying journalists to report the agenda of the CIA . Trump destroyed it. As a result, the supply of taxpayer dollars being used to fund NGO’s used to agitate against the American people has been cut.
Trump has challenged the rules on firing agency officials resulting in multiple SCOTUS cases. It appears likely that SCOTUS is about to overturn nearly 80 years of precedent to greatly expand the power of the presidency to fire unaccountable bureaucrats who carry out their agenda regardless of whomever is president. Trump’s previous term consisted of agencies essentially ignoring appointed officials and actively opposing the White House. That’s about to end.
These aren’t just small changes, but massive ones. It is impossible to overstate just how much of your tax dollars were being spent ensuring that no matter who you voted for, government would carry on exactly the same. That will soon be over.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:06 pm to The_Duke
quote:
’m sincerely trying to understand the mindset

Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:11 pm to The_Duke
quote:
How does someone who once passionately supported the fight against political corruption reconcile this transformation?
His base does it as easily as they breathe.
Personally I’m not surprised by any of it and I know I’m not the only one. There’s nothing to reconcile; Trump is not a transformational leader and we knew this after his first term. He’s not draining shite and he’s going to continue to spend us into oblivion.
Voting for him was still an easy choice given the options, and he brings positives with his negatives. Border : good, military culture : excellent, cabinet : good for the most part. And the option was Kamala.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:15 pm to The_Duke
UP NEXT:
1. Bolton
2. Schiff
3. Brennan
4. Clapper
5. Hillary
6. Comey
7. Wray
1. Bolton
2. Schiff
3. Brennan
4. Clapper
5. Hillary
6. Comey
7. Wray
Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:16 pm to The_Duke
quote:
What Happened to Trump’s Anti-Corruption Crusade?

Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:25 pm to The_Duke
you probably should've waited a few days before you started this shite. Historic day of peace in the ME with hostages being reunited with their families. Even Hillary and Obama had to give Trump an attaboy, but your TDS is so toxic, you couldn't wait a day to try to foment some dissatisfaction with POTUS. Clinical level psychosis. Seek help.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:29 pm to The_Duke
Trump is so money hungry that he donated his salary to charity, not once but twice. And all of these wars he is ending. There must be a personal financial gain to him. 
Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:31 pm to NC_Tigah
Hey,
I was specifically pointing out the financial gains he called out, and I gave specific examples.
The James Comey fiasco seems like a retrubtiom case.
The Jan 6 attack is somthing we will never agree on, as you all seem to think it was some grand conspiracy of Antifa and now FBI agents committing the crimes. It really doesn't make sense now that Trump pardoned all the people involved. I'm not sure how someone can believe both--Trump pardoned antifa and FBI agents?
I was specifically pointing out the financial gains he called out, and I gave specific examples.
The James Comey fiasco seems like a retrubtiom case.
The Jan 6 attack is somthing we will never agree on, as you all seem to think it was some grand conspiracy of Antifa and now FBI agents committing the crimes. It really doesn't make sense now that Trump pardoned all the people involved. I'm not sure how someone can believe both--Trump pardoned antifa and FBI agents?
Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:32 pm to The_Duke
Talking point because of the peace deal. Dems have their talking points, post as much negative stuff as possible to distract from the Obama-Biden failures.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:35 pm to Reagan80
quote:
Talking point because of the peace deal. Dems have their talking points, post as much negative stuff as possible to distract from the Obama-Biden failures.
Where would I get these talking points from? And why would the peach deal impact my thoughts on this topic?
Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:36 pm to The_Duke
quote:
The_Duke
Sucks to be in the minority doesn't it Scooter?
Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:37 pm to The_Duke
From an LLM. It's pretty clear slop (though not untrue).
Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:38 pm to The_Duke
quote:It only seems like a retrubtiom case if you somehow don't understand he manufactured evidence, perjured himself, and leaked classified information as Director of the FBI.
The James Comey fiasco seems like a retrubtiom case
Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:38 pm to The_Duke
What the heck mate? You post this today?
Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:39 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
From an LLM. It's pretty clear slop (though not untrue).
I stated this prior, but this is the only political space I visit to discuss topics. I find more value in reading things I may disagree with and gaining some perspective than in only digesting things I agree with.
This post was edited on 10/13/25 at 3:40 pm
Popular
Back to top

33












