- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Nvidia CEO says using the term "China Hawk" is a badge of shame, it's unpatriotic.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 4:46 pm
Posted on 10/12/25 at 4:46 pm
From Google AI.....
AI Overview
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently called the term "China hawk" a "badge of shame". He accused those who use the label of "destroying" opportunities and acting in a way that is "not patriotic," arguing that U.S. export restrictions against China are harming America's own innovation and economic interests.
Key points from Huang's comments.
Focus on U.S. competitiveness: Huang has repeatedly argued that by restricting sales to China, the U.S. government is isolating American technology and allowing Chinese competitors to gain ground. He stated that if the U.S. does not participate in the Chinese market, Chinese companies like Huawei will fill the void.
China's rapid progress: In an interview on the BG2 podcast, Huang warned that China's AI chip technology is only "nanoseconds behind" the U.S. and that its progress is fueled by its massive talent pool and intense work culture.
Impact of U.S. restrictions: Huang has called U.S. chip export controls a "failure," stating that the policies have cut Nvidia's market share in China's AI chip market from 95% to 50%. In his view, these restrictions have motivated Beijing to accelerate its own domestic chip development.
Commercial vs. political concerns: Huang has tried to separate commercial activity from geopolitical tensions. In 2025, after U.S. restrictions on an Nvidia chip model known as the H20 were lifted, he emphasized that allowing sales for "beneficial commercial use" is good for everyone.
Long-term strategic risk: Huang’s stance reflects broader industry concerns that, in the long run, U.S. sanctions could damage the American tech industry by forcing China to become technologically self-sufficient.
What is a "China hawk"?
A "China hawk" is a political term for an individual who holds a hardline, aggressive stance toward the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and advocates for policies to contain or confront China. In the context of technology and trade, this typically refers to policymakers who support strict export controls and other measures to limit China's access to advanced technologies like AI chips.
I wear the China Hawk label as a badge of honor, not as a badge of shame. But then again I'm America First/MAGA.
I watched the US Corporatocracy over the past 40 years sell the American people out to foreign interests that have made many of these corporatists fabulously wealthy.
AI Overview
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently called the term "China hawk" a "badge of shame". He accused those who use the label of "destroying" opportunities and acting in a way that is "not patriotic," arguing that U.S. export restrictions against China are harming America's own innovation and economic interests.
Key points from Huang's comments.
Focus on U.S. competitiveness: Huang has repeatedly argued that by restricting sales to China, the U.S. government is isolating American technology and allowing Chinese competitors to gain ground. He stated that if the U.S. does not participate in the Chinese market, Chinese companies like Huawei will fill the void.
China's rapid progress: In an interview on the BG2 podcast, Huang warned that China's AI chip technology is only "nanoseconds behind" the U.S. and that its progress is fueled by its massive talent pool and intense work culture.
Impact of U.S. restrictions: Huang has called U.S. chip export controls a "failure," stating that the policies have cut Nvidia's market share in China's AI chip market from 95% to 50%. In his view, these restrictions have motivated Beijing to accelerate its own domestic chip development.
Commercial vs. political concerns: Huang has tried to separate commercial activity from geopolitical tensions. In 2025, after U.S. restrictions on an Nvidia chip model known as the H20 were lifted, he emphasized that allowing sales for "beneficial commercial use" is good for everyone.
Long-term strategic risk: Huang’s stance reflects broader industry concerns that, in the long run, U.S. sanctions could damage the American tech industry by forcing China to become technologically self-sufficient.
What is a "China hawk"?
A "China hawk" is a political term for an individual who holds a hardline, aggressive stance toward the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and advocates for policies to contain or confront China. In the context of technology and trade, this typically refers to policymakers who support strict export controls and other measures to limit China's access to advanced technologies like AI chips.
I wear the China Hawk label as a badge of honor, not as a badge of shame. But then again I'm America First/MAGA.
I watched the US Corporatocracy over the past 40 years sell the American people out to foreign interests that have made many of these corporatists fabulously wealthy.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 4:48 pm to Bass Tiger
China Hawk > China dick.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 4:58 pm to Rebel
quote:
China Hawk > China dick.
Did someone say China dick?

Posted on 10/12/25 at 5:01 pm to BoomerandSooner
This ^^^^ is the prototypical leftist/progressive male.
Crazy stuff.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 5:01 pm to Bass Tiger
Huang. Funny he would say that. His parents, who were of Chinese descent. Don't trust. Don't care if he is technically from Taiwan.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 5:04 pm to Bass Tiger
That a-hole is worried about his bottom line, not the future of our country.
Staying ahead of China in AI is the #1 security threat to this country. China is all about taking us down,.end of story. Why help them?.Make them do it on their own.
We should be going after China on AI with a Manhattan Project attitude.
Chinese AI is infinitely more a concern that imaginary nukes in Iran.
Staying ahead of China in AI is the #1 security threat to this country. China is all about taking us down,.end of story. Why help them?.Make them do it on their own.
We should be going after China on AI with a Manhattan Project attitude.
Chinese AI is infinitely more a concern that imaginary nukes in Iran.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 5:07 pm to Tiger985
quote:
Staying ahead of China in AI is the #1 security threat to this country.
I used to think this and have concluded I was terribly wrong
Posted on 10/12/25 at 5:09 pm to Powerman
AI has been tremendously oversold and overhyped. The bubble is bursting.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 5:10 pm to 4cubbies
Ironically it's the only thing towing this shite economy along
Posted on 10/12/25 at 5:11 pm to Powerman
I used to think this and have concluded I was terribly wrong
That should be occurring numerous times a day for you, but unfortunately….. you’re still a giant retarded loser
That should be occurring numerous times a day for you, but unfortunately….. you’re still a giant retarded loser
Posted on 10/12/25 at 5:14 pm to Bass Tiger
Who is he implying said “china hawk”?
Posted on 10/12/25 at 5:15 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
AI has been tremendously oversold and overhyped. The bubble is bursting.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 5:16 pm to Rebel
China is arsehole.
Ask every other nation surrounding them.
Ask every other nation surrounding them.
This post was edited on 10/12/25 at 5:17 pm
Posted on 10/12/25 at 5:19 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
AI has been tremendously oversold and overhyped. The bubble is bursting.
Based on what metric exactly?
A few stats. Click on the pdf inside the link for even more stats that say otherwise.
https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2025-ai-index-report
Posted on 10/12/25 at 5:20 pm to BoomerandSooner
For as amazingly wrong as she is about just about everything, that may have been her wrongest statement yet. Truly jarring ignorance masquerading as informed opinion. It's getting old.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 5:22 pm to BoomerandSooner
quote:
Based on what metric exactly?
The fact that these mega corps still haven't figured out the best way to monetize their products.
Only 1 percent of chatGPT users are using the paid subscription model. Everyone else is using the free version.
Huge investments are being made because these tech companies like NVIDIA have massive cash reserves and are funding demand for their own products with their investments.
Maybe they get some things figured out but right now they are still in limbo.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 5:25 pm to GRTiger
quote:
For as amazingly wrong as she is about just about everything, that may have been her wrongest statement yet. Truly jarring ignorance masquerading as informed opinion. It's getting old.
It is a pretty mind blowingly stupid take. I only see her posts here on the politics board. I can only imagine her hot takes on the other boards and in real life.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 5:25 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
Nvidia's operations in China
Although Nvidia does not have factories in the country, it has a significant business presence in China:
Local offices: The company maintains a number of offices for sales, marketing, and local operations in cities like Beijing, Guangzhou, and Shanghai.
Customer base and partners: Nvidia has numerous customers and partners in China, including large tech companies like Alibaba, Tencent, and Baidu.
Adjusting to trade restrictions: Due to U.S. export controls that restrict the sale of its most powerful AI chips to China, Nvidia developed specialized, less-powerful processors like the H20 to sell in the Chinese market
. Recent reports indicate escalating trade tensions and new restrictions imposed by the Chinese government affecting Nvidia's access to the market.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 5:26 pm to BoomerandSooner
quote:
Based on what metric exactly?
Free AI is being shoved down everyone’s throats, highlighting its limitations and inaccuracies.
Your pdf affirms my whole argument.
Popular
Back to top

11








