- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Elon looking to take out Wikipedia with Grokipedia
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:57 pm
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:57 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Baw is gonna help humanity whether we like it or not
13
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:02 pm to hawgfaninc
What's the problem with Wikipedia? The math articles rule
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:03 pm to Riggle
quote:It says unflattering things about him.
What's the problem with Wikipedia?
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:05 pm to hawgfaninc
Grokipedia will query Wikipedia
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:06 pm to 632627
Really?
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:06 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Elon looking to take out Wikipedia with Grokipedia
Not to be confused with USAA's Gronkipedia.
This post was edited on 9/30/25 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:10 pm to 632627
quote:
Strong left bias
Genuine question what articles have left leaning bias? I feel like it covers cold war topics with taste and I'd expect that's where you see it
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:10 pm to 632627
quote:
Strong left bias
I have good news. If you find an article that doesn't match your bias, you can edit it. Try it out.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:12 pm to Riggle
quote:
Genuine question what articles have left leaning bias? I feel like it covers cold war topics with taste and I'd expect that's where you see it
Anyone/anything that's related to politics. Conservatives are often described as "far right" and "conspiracy theorist" gets thrown out alot
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:13 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:14 pm to 632627
Just read about Jan. 6, the Russian collusion, and even people like Dan bongino.
Its terrible. And some topics they will lock down to avoid the truth.
Its terrible. And some topics they will lock down to avoid the truth.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:15 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:Will they be able to tell me where to get the best 22” tires on the Northshore?
Grokipedia
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:15 pm to Riggle
quote:
What's the problem with Wikipedia?
It isn't objective and it doesn't reflect the aggregate knowledge of the public. It reflects the biases of those who obtained power.
Examples from the sports world: An Auburn fan became an admin and banned any mention of Grand Theft Auburn, even though it's an objective fact that there was an officiating controversy. Another mod removed the page for the Terrible Towel curse, which gained notoriety after several teams physically desecrated a Terrible Towel and then suffered misfortune, culminating in the Titans meltdown the rest of that season and into next season.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:18 pm to Riggle
quote:
What's the problem with Wikipedia? The math articles rule
Short Answer: Wikipedia is pretty much nothing more than the cliff notes of the mainstream media narrative.
In theory it's editable by the public, but that's not how it works.The "admins" set the rules and only edits that follow the rules are ultimately allowed.
There are essentially 62 anonymous super admins that run the wholes site.
Wikipedia is just another form of reddit, a fake "public forum" site where allowed information is strictly curated.
This post was edited on 9/30/25 at 6:20 pm
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:19 pm to hawgfaninc
Wikipedia is good for a quick overview/reminder on topics. and the math and science is great too.
the biggest problem with wikipedia is in then current events/social sciences/history articles
I have found a ton of inaccuracies in their articles about the IRA/The troubles. a lot of stuff that was just flat out made up.
the biggest problem with wikipedia is in then current events/social sciences/history articles
I have found a ton of inaccuracies in their articles about the IRA/The troubles. a lot of stuff that was just flat out made up.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:21 pm to N2cars
quote:
Really?
When it is in any way a political p/p/t it can go kinda hard in the paint.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:21 pm to EastWestConnection
quote:
Wikipedia is good for a quick overview/reminder on topics. and the math and science is great too.
the biggest problem with wikipedia is in then current events/social sciences/history articles
This. The less controversial the subject, the more reliable Wikipedia is. If the subject matter is dry or non-controversial, it's actually a good resource.
Anything with subjective opinion or political overtones, it's absolutely awful. It has gotten WAY worse over the past decade as well. THe early iterations of the articles were way more neutral, it has veered left wing big time over time.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:25 pm to Gravitiger
quote:
It says unflattering things about him.
He needs some thicker skin
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:26 pm to 632627
quote:Even the co-founders admit this.
Strong left bias
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News