- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Comey Indictment Reveal: ‘PERSON 1’ and ‘PERSON 3’ Unmasked
Posted on 9/27/25 at 9:20 am
Posted on 9/27/25 at 9:20 am
LINK
quote:
ABC News is reporting that “PERSON 1” is none other than Hillary Clinton—the queen of corruption herself—and “PERSON 3” is James Comey’s buddy and one-time personal lawyer, Daniel Richman. This isn’t some footnote; it’s the DOJ accusing Comey of flat-out lying under oath about using Richman as his secret pipeline to leak dirt to the media on an FBI probe tied to Clinton.
6
Posted on 9/27/25 at 9:26 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
(D)eplorables.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 9:52 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Thanks for posting. So someone in DOJ leaked to ABC who Person 1 and Person 3 are? Looking forward to that prosecution.
Maybe the reporting is correct, but the indictment says: "by falsely stating to a U.S. Senator during a Senate..." The Senator who brought up leaks was Cruz, and he was clearly talking about the McCabe leak to the WSJ over the Clinton emails.
At least we can retire the idea that the indictment has anything to do with RussiaGate.
Maybe the reporting is correct, but the indictment says: "by falsely stating to a U.S. Senator during a Senate..." The Senator who brought up leaks was Cruz, and he was clearly talking about the McCabe leak to the WSJ over the Clinton emails.
At least we can retire the idea that the indictment has anything to do with RussiaGate.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:19 am to IvoryBillMatt
Looks like you called the Hillary part yesterday...
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:22 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Looking forward to that prosecution.
Rough week for you.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:24 am to the808bass
That dude might be the biggest imposter on this board.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:35 am to TDTOM
He has ameliorated his harshness to conservative principles from his other posting characters. Same ol dude.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:43 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:48 am to the808bass
quote:
Rough week for you.
Why? I'm all for the prosecution of Comey. I'm just sorry that---at least with this indictment---it won't be for Russiagate and his investigations of Trump and allies.
Another poster mentioned the possibility that this was just a placeholder indictment to beat the statute of limitations. He speculated that a superseding indictment would be filed. That would be great.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:52 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Why? I'm all for the prosecution of Comey. I'm just sorry that---at least with this indictment---it won't be for Russiagate and his investigations of Trump and allies.
Statute of limitations are hindering that, unfortunately
Posted on 9/27/25 at 11:03 am to TDTOM
quote:
That dude might be the biggest imposter on this board.
What am I posing as? What conservative principle do you think I oppose?
I am always clear. I support Trump's deportation plans. I think the occasional "mistake," is a good plan because it encourages self-deportation.
I support the Trump DOJ in prosecuting all officials who have broken the law. My favorites are the prosecutions of Judge Dugan and Rep. McIver. Maybe they will get the prosecution of Comey right. Very disappointed that there seems no progress against Liz Cheney and her J6 kangaroo court conspirators.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 11:43 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
IvoryBillMatt
And yet you started an entire post saying that person 3 was McCabe, and bizarrely that Comeys leak would have helped Trump
You must be demoralized. Especially since we have these statements
quote:
Comey testified in June 2017 that he gave Richman the memos in an attempt to get a special counsel appointed following his firing.
quote:
PERSON 3 is Richman, a longtime law professor who -- as ABC News previously reported -- met with federal prosecutors last week after being subpoenaed in the matter
quote:
Comey publicly admitted to providing him with memos that documented meetings with Trump during Trump's first term and asking him to share information from some of the memos with a New York Times reporter.
quote:
Declassified FBI files state that Comey “used Richman as a liaison to the media,” to correct stories critical of Comey,
quote:
Richman said he didn't share classified information with reporters and that, as he saw it, he was helping Comey "get information out that ... was unclassified, unprivileged," and "of enormous national importance
So its pretty cut and dried. Comey gave testimony that he never leaked FBI material to anyone. Then Comey and Daniel Richman both said publicly that Comey gave internal memos that Richman leaked to the NY Times
The prick is guilty. Beyond a reasonable doubt
Posted on 9/27/25 at 11:57 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
ABC News is reporting that “PERSON 1” is none other than Hillary Clinton
Wait a minute! Are they telling me that Hillary Rodham Clinton isn't really the saint who was practically deified by Kate McKinnon on SNL the first Saturday after HRC's stunning defeat by Hitler 2.0 in 2016?
Talk amongst yourselves. I'm verklempt.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 12:04 pm to RobbBobb
I'm not demoralized. Like most people, I assumed that the indictment was over the thing for which most of us want Comey fried: Russiagate.
I did the research. The indictment referenced only Comey's testimony to one Senator on 9/30/20. That was Cruz. According to Cruz's own press release, he was going after Comey on the McCabe leak to the WSJ...I'm enjoying a college football Saturday...none of my rehashing means anything to you.
Cutting to the chase, do you agree if Person 1 is Clinton then the indictment leaks that Comey authorized had nothing to do with RussiaGate?
I did the research. The indictment referenced only Comey's testimony to one Senator on 9/30/20. That was Cruz. According to Cruz's own press release, he was going after Comey on the McCabe leak to the WSJ...I'm enjoying a college football Saturday...none of my rehashing means anything to you.
Cutting to the chase, do you agree if Person 1 is Clinton then the indictment leaks that Comey authorized had nothing to do with RussiaGate?
Posted on 9/27/25 at 12:27 pm to RobbBobb
Not worth wasting much more time on, but it's not a slam dunk that Person 3 is Richman.
Here's CNN's reporting on it might still be McCabe:
"The possibility remains that Person 3 could have been former deputy FBI Director Andy McCabe, who is now a CNN contributor.
In Comey’s testimony cited in the indictment, Sen. Ted Cruz specifically asks Comey about statements from McCabe that the Texas Republican said contradicted Comey’s prior testimony. Comey responded he stood by his testimony.
But several sources said that while Cruz’s question referenced McCabe, Person 3 appeared to be Richman."
CNN story
I was swayed by the same logic because Cruz's question was about McCabe.
Here's CNN's reporting on it might still be McCabe:
"The possibility remains that Person 3 could have been former deputy FBI Director Andy McCabe, who is now a CNN contributor.
In Comey’s testimony cited in the indictment, Sen. Ted Cruz specifically asks Comey about statements from McCabe that the Texas Republican said contradicted Comey’s prior testimony. Comey responded he stood by his testimony.
But several sources said that while Cruz’s question referenced McCabe, Person 3 appeared to be Richman."
CNN story
I was swayed by the same logic because Cruz's question was about McCabe.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 12:36 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
ABC News is reporting that “PERSON 1” is none other than white Christian male hating Hillary Clinton—the queen of corruption herself—
Tyrus said to call them out by labeling them who they say they are until they explain their position or start getting questioned by the lying complicite media partners.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 12:38 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I am not sure why all those involved in the attempted overthrow of a duly elected President aren’t being charged with seditious conspiracy!
Posted on 9/27/25 at 12:39 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
In Comey’s testimony cited in the indictment, Sen. Ted Cruz specifically asks Comey about statements from McCabe that the Texas Republican said contradicted Comey’s prior testimony. Comey responded he stood by his testimony.
They used Teds question only to start the 5 year clock on the crime. His question may have been 100% about McCabe, but Comeys statement said he never leaked to ANYONE
The Grand Jury then subpoenaed Daniel Richman. He became the ANYONE that Comey lied about in his 2000 testimony, not McCabe
Comey is guilty. And Richman unknowingly testified to that fact before the grand jury. Thats why Comeys son-in-law raced in to see the presiding judge, and then resigned after their 30 min. meeting
Posted on 9/27/25 at 12:52 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
but Comeys statement said he never leaked to ANYONE
Thx for the discussion. You're coming close to convincing me. The final kicker is that the lie Comey is alleged to have said in the indictment was not that COMEY had not leaked anything, but that he had had not “authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports regarding an FBI
investigation concerning PERSON 1."
Does that still match up with Richman? It couldn't apply to any "authorization" AFTER Comey had been fired, because he no authority to order someone at the FBI at that point.
This post was edited on 9/27/25 at 2:02 pm
Posted on 9/27/25 at 2:33 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
What conservative principle do you think I oppose?
Not walking around with your head up your aass?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News