- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Amateur Hour Security Failure
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:50 pm
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:50 pm
I’m not a security expert by any means, but I can tell you if I had a security team you bet your arse I’d have every fricking roof crossed and dotted. Like how does this happen. EVERY ROOF gets security if it has a vantage point to the target up to a mile in every god damn direction.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:51 pm to Catchfalaya
quote:
EVERY ROOF gets security if it has a vantage point to the target up to a mile in every god damn direction.
How big do you think his security detail is, exactly?
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
Catchfalaya thinks that Charlie Kirk had a 150+ person security detail like the Chicago Mayor has
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:52 pm to Catchfalaya
quote:
I’m not a security expert by any means, but I can tell you if I had a security team you bet your arse I’d have every fricking roof crossed and dotted. Like how does this happen. EVERY ROOF gets security if it has a vantage point to the target up to a mile in every god damn direction.
This was a run of the mill college event for Charlie.
How much do you think that kind of protection costs?
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
It doesn’t matter every roof gets someone on it. Even if it’s a local bouncer at a bar. Period. You find a way.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
1 guy on a rooftop would have probably been enough
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:53 pm to Catchfalaya
quote:
not a security expert by any means
We can tell.
quote:
Like how does this happen.
Exactly the way it did.
He's a political activist, not the president. He had a handful of bodyguards. A real security details is hundreds of people, drones, undercover people, days of prep, and entry and exit screening. Counter sniper teams. Cameras everywhere.
This was a normal guy debating college kids. He didnt have all that, and its unfair to expect his meager security team to have been able to deal with this effectively.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:54 pm to KosmoCramer
Cost should be a non factor.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How big do you think his security detail is, exactly?
So you don't believe Charlie Kirk who was worth 150-200 million dollars has the means to have a security detail that covers a roof directly in front of him 200 yards away?
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:55 pm to Catchfalaya
quote:
It doesn’t matter every roof gets someone on it. Even if it’s a local bouncer at a bar. Period. You find a way.
Stop posting.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:55 pm to KosmoCramer
Should have had a drone up
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:57 pm to Catchfalaya
quote:
Cost should be a non factor.
Keep us posted when you re-join reality.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:57 pm to John Barron
quote:
So you don't believe Charlie Kirk who was worth 150-200 million dollars has the means to have a security detail that covers a roof directly in front of him 200 yards away?
I was going to ask how a person could be so dumb, but then I saw John Barron was back
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:57 pm to navy
Thank you. Stop settling for it happened he’s not the president. Excuses everywhere. It was a piss poor security failure. Period
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:58 pm to Catchfalaya
He's not the president and he's not the pope. Cost absolutely matters, and no university is going to allow the kind of disruption there is for a real security detail for an open air political debate with a semi famous podcaster.
You're emotional and delusional. The reality is that a true watertite security detail at an open air event is not possible. A lone nut job is virtually impossible to defense in a public space. Guns, drones, cars, bombs, swords have all been used to assassinate prominent figures.
Somebody got a shot off at Donald Trump not long ago if you'll recall.
You're emotional and delusional. The reality is that a true watertite security detail at an open air event is not possible. A lone nut job is virtually impossible to defense in a public space. Guns, drones, cars, bombs, swords have all been used to assassinate prominent figures.
Somebody got a shot off at Donald Trump not long ago if you'll recall.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:58 pm to shutterspeed
quote:
Keep us posted when you re-join reality.
These idiots don't even realize they're criticizing Charlie Kirk, ultimately, for not agreeing with their hindsight bias regarding security.
I hope they feel like shite for acting like such extreme assholes.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:59 pm to John Barron
Barron, how much are you getting paid to post this shite?
Posted on 9/11/25 at 9:00 pm to Leopold
I could put a cheap drone up to watch the roofs, it ain’t hard at all
Posted on 9/11/25 at 9:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I was going to ask how a person could be so dumb
You are the one claiming someone worth 150-200 million doesn't have the means for a security detail that covers a roof directly in front of him 200 yards away
Posted on 9/11/25 at 9:01 pm to Catchfalaya
quote:
EVERY ROOF gets security if it has a vantage point to the target up to a mile in every god damn direction.
For a talking event at a college? I’m surprised he had more than a single bodyguard. That is a very low risk environment.
Popular
Back to top

14






