Started By
Message

So I was listening to Tony Aguilar on Tucker, and I am wondering about military disability

Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:15 am
Posted by AndyJ
Member since Jul 2008
3443 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:15 am
He is talking about some Gaza humanitarian group he was working for, and he is whistle blowing on the organization (and I suspect also the IDF). But about 28 minutes in, he discusses how they are impugning his service record even though he received 100% combat related special compensation.

He explains how this means he is disabled and does not pay taxes.

So I went from listening about Gaza to wondering how this guy is possibly abusing the system. I mean if you are 100% disabled from the military, God bless you! But if you are claiming 100% disability and then headed to a combat zone, even as an aid worker, then that sounds sketchy. Can anyone help clarify?
This post was edited on 8/8/25 at 9:16 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465923 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:18 am to
Military disability is....interesting, these days. I'll just say that.

Caleb Hammer has made this a sticking point in his videos.



Long thread on the OT from May 2025 about it
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
38211 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:19 am to
quote:

I am wondering about military disability


Everybody that gets out of the military has a some type of service related disability
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66610 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:19 am to
That podcast was getting a lot of positive run in alt media. I was going to dive in this weekend.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103130 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:19 am to
I’m curious myself as to what is considered a 100% military disability.

This implies someone who lost a limb or is a paraplegic, not someone who got a rice grain in the arse from an explosion like John Kerry did for one of his Purple Hearts.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53537 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:20 am to
We should take away all military disability payments in order to fund Kindergarten sex-change surgery and Mandatory Queer Culture Enhancement Programs at Christian Grade Schools.

And pay James Carville to read bedtime stories to our Pre-Schoolers.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296201 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:21 am to
Old buddy of mine twisted his knee in marine boot camp in the 80s, got all kinds of money to go back to school, including a stipend.

Fed gov paid his way through the U. or Oregon, bought all his supplies etc.

Posted by AndyJ
Member since Jul 2008
3443 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:21 am to
Yeah… and I am happy to give combat vets the benefit of the doubt. But when you hit 100%, I would think that meant some sort of incapacitation
Posted by Sam Quint
Member since Sep 2022
8048 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:21 am to
quote:

I mean if you are 100% disabled from the military, God bless you! But if you are claiming 100% disability and then headed to a combat zone, even as an aid worker, then that sounds sketchy. Can anyone help clarify?

i'll help clarify. he's full of shite like the vast majority of vets with insanely high disability percentages. they get really butthurt when you call them out though, as you will see shortly on this thread.
Posted by AndyJ
Member since Jul 2008
3443 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:22 am to
quote:

We should take away all military disability payments in order to fund Kindergarten sex-change surgery and Mandatory Queer Culture Enhancement Programs at Christian Grade Schools. And pay James Carville to read bedtime stories to our Pre-Schoolers.


Ok that is about as unhinged answer as I would expect from some 20-something blue haired liberal chick
This post was edited on 8/8/25 at 9:35 am
Posted by Sam Quint
Member since Sep 2022
8048 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:22 am to
quote:

and I am happy to give combat vets the benefit of the doubt

you shouldn't
This post was edited on 8/8/25 at 9:23 am
Posted by soonerinlOUisiana
South of I-10
Member since Aug 2012
1073 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:27 am to
Doesn’t the military have a relatively low standard for disability? A friend from college was “severed” from the USAF because of a bad knee. She was a nurse practitioner who entered service in her late 30s. I get the impression that the standard is “fitness for service” and not actually disabled to the point of qualifying for SSDI.

ETA: She is far from disabled. Had her knee scoped and now does kickboxing, hiking, and all sorts of recreational sports.
This post was edited on 8/8/25 at 9:43 am
Posted by USAFTiger42
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2016
3704 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:29 am to
I may have a lot of issues but I'll never claim any because I can get help from civilian docs and I'm also a ChemE. I've definitely been deployed but not any direct combat zones.

Also not all 100%'s are equal. He might have tdiu which basically means you can't earn a dime. P&T is what I've seen a lot of and that's like getting a retirement check while having a job.

The crazier thing is being in the reserves and having 100% but you have to pay back the VA for the 39 days (24 days of drill and 15 for annual tour).
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
107036 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:36 am to
A lot of people get 100% disability who don't necessarily deserve it, and some who do deserve it can't get it. Part of it is greedy disability examiners who work for companies contracted by VBA. Many of these types don't do a good evaluation and just check boxes on the forms because they get paid per person they see. The more people than can shuffle through the more they get paid, no matter how bad their exam is. This can work either for or against the Veteran making the claim, though I've found many Veterans place more value on someone actually listening to them and caring about what they say than what the final percentage ends up being.

I am often called upon to review these exams from outside the VA and it is obvious, at least to me, whether an examiner put in any effort or not. My job is then to clarify the medical opinion so the proper outcome can hopefully be reached.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
107036 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Everybody that gets out of the military has a some type of service related disability


Not true, though absolutes are rarely true.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:39 am to
n/m
This post was edited on 8/8/25 at 9:40 am
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
107036 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:44 am to
quote:

I’m curious myself as to what is considered a 100% military disability.


It is supposed to mean "Total occupational and social impairment." We're not talking bad deficits in some areas, we're talking total impairment. That is what it means for one individual condition; however, multiple conditions can be added together to reach that 100%, but the math VBA uses is a bit funky. Say you have 50% for PTSD and 20% for a bad knee, that will put you at 60% overall (all of the 50% plus half of the 20%). It's get stranger from there and I can't tell exactly how they add it all together, but you could have 5 additional conditions at 20% each and somehow still not get to 100% overall.
Posted by RadRob
Acadiana
Member since Oct 2021
223 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 9:53 am to
VA disability is a confusing to say the least. VA math is not a straight up number. Most retired Vets have 80%-100% and are healthy enough to hold a fulltime job.
Special Monthly Compensation (SMC) is an additional monetary benefit paid to veterans who have very severe service-connected disabilities. It is paid on top of the standard disability compensation and is intended to address the unique challenges and needs arising from these disabilities.
SMC is categorized into different levels, each corresponding to a specific severity of disability or need for assistance. These levels are designated as K, L, M, N, O, P, R, and T.
In essence, SMC is a crucial benefit for veterans with significant service-connected disabilities, providing them with the financial support needed to address their unique challenges and needs.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
9426 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 10:05 am to
quote:

So I went from listening about Gaza to wondering how this guy is possibly abusing the system. I mean if you are 100% disabled from the military, God bless you! But if you are claiming 100% disability and then headed to a combat zone, even as an aid worker, then that sounds sketchy. Can anyone help clarify?


One of my best friends saw combat in every conflict the U.S. has been involved with since Kosovo. He did several tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. He has PTSD, hearing loss etc. He put his arse on the line many, many times and watched a lot of his buddies get killed. I'm fine with him collecting 100% disability. Get all the other freeloading do-nothing leeches off the government money teet first.
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
17917 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 10:07 am to
Military disability is a joke for about 80% of the recipients. I know from personal experience and it is disgusting.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram