Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

As American voters who voted for Trump, do we all have Standing…

Posted on 7/23/25 at 2:43 pm
Posted by Asleepinthecove
Lafayette
Member since Jan 2023
1954 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 2:43 pm
To be able to file a Civil class action lawsuit against Obama and all those in his cabinet who mislead Americans by this phony intelligence story or would everyone be immune to civil suits? We were definitely robbed of all the things that he could have done had his attention not been consumed defending himself against impeachment. I would like nothing better than to bankrupt all these frickers!
This post was edited on 7/23/25 at 2:44 pm
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
71316 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 2:44 pm to
I don't know, but I am pro being able to sue the government every time it lies to us.
This post was edited on 7/23/25 at 2:45 pm
Posted by 4LSU2
Member since Dec 2009
37923 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 2:45 pm to
Wait until all the facts are known about the origin of COVID, reasons they opened the border, funneled our tax dollars through USAID, the child trafficking that has occurred with our own monies, paying illegals out of our social security funds, etc.

I could go on for days on what our own federal government has done against We The People.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
35670 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 2:45 pm to
A civil suit against a sitting US President at the time?

Novel......who gets you to write this stuff?
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
83557 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 2:47 pm to
The precedent set by dem appointed judges would say yes.
Posted by Asleepinthecove
Lafayette
Member since Jan 2023
1954 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

A civil suit against a sitting US President at the time? Novel......who gets you to write this stuff?


Yes, I’m aware the executive branch is afforded certain legal protections but violations of the constitution by sedition or treason, seems like an arguable case for a Civil lawsuit.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
35670 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 3:06 pm to
Ummmmm. Explain how any of this was actual treason or sedition? Was Trump actively prevented from taking office in 2017? Was his certification held up in 2017? I don't mean protested, but was there an action to physically prevent both?

If Trump was delayed taking office, you might have an argument.

Your vote counted in 2016, Trump won . Trump took the oath of office on Jan.20 2017 as proscribed by law. To complain about Trump's inability to effectively govern or run his branch post Jan.20, 2017, ain't on no one but Trump and Reince Priebus.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
91071 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

I don't know, but I am pro being able to sue the government every time it lies to us.
how would you find time to eat or sleep?
Posted by Motownsix
Boise
Member since Oct 2022
3094 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

To be able to file a Civil class action lawsuit against Obama and all those in his cabinet who mislead Americans by this phony intelligence story


The case is probably hampered by the fact that DJT JR sent out emails bragging about all the information the Russians had for him to use in the 2016 election.
Maybe if he didn’t meet with the Russians with Manafort there would be a case.
Posted by Purplehaze
spring, tx
Member since Dec 2003
2298 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 3:44 pm to
Google Trump VS United States for your answer. It is called Presidential Immunity.
Posted by 56lsu
jackson mich
Member since Dec 2005
7839 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 3:57 pm to
you would be rich with trump in office.
Posted by Nelson Biederman IV
New York, NY
Member since Apr 2014
620 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

Your vote counted in 2016, Trump won . Trump took the oath of office on Jan.20 2017 as proscribed by law. To complain about Trump's inability to effectively govern or run his branch post Jan.20, 2017, ain't on no one but Trump and Reince Priebus.



You’re right. Two impeachments, under constant attack from the media, and a lack of support in congress(that could be blamed on a perceived lack of support from their constituents that you might say was affected by the aforementioned) did not impede him at all. All of this because of fraudulent, seditious activity.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
35670 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:40 pm to
Where was the use of force in all of this for this seditious conspiracy?

Trump got a lesson in real hardball politics, but that does not meet the seditious threshold, not even close. You can't call treason, what was done does not even come anywhere close to the definition.


Do better
Posted by Nelson Biederman IV
New York, NY
Member since Apr 2014
620 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:48 pm to
This isn’t the 18th century. Sedition doesn’t mean violence. Hell, historically speaking, there’s plenty of precedent for the mere act of conspiracy constitute treason. Treason is the crime of betraying one’s country. That argument is easily made. Sabotaging the duly elected president. The end.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
53597 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

I don't know, but I am pro being able to sue the government every time it lies to us.


It's very interesting how the federal government has worked tirelessly over the decades to protected itself from populace retribution.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
35670 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:56 pm to
The law would disagree with you
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram