- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If He Needs to, Can Obama Successfully Claim "Presidential Immunity" For His Crimes?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 3:47 pm
Short video....
Posted on 7/21/25 at 3:49 pm to KCT
It would be hilarious if he got indicted and Trump, the merciful, pardoned him.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 3:52 pm to KCT
He can try.
SFP, boosie, Kiwi and assorted other faggotry experts said Obama's decisions are totally harmless and Trump just needs to let seditious conspiracy go unpunished. They're figs lke that.
SFP, boosie, Kiwi and assorted other faggotry experts said Obama's decisions are totally harmless and Trump just needs to let seditious conspiracy go unpunished. They're figs lke that.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 3:52 pm to TrueTiger
That's what I predicted this morning.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 3:55 pm to KCT
Called this yesterday, it would get swept under the rug of Presidential Immunity somehow
Posted on 7/21/25 at 3:56 pm to Houag80
There is no presidential immunity when he is OUT of office. So, his actions, communications, etc. after Trump’s inauguration are the keys to downtown.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 3:58 pm to KCT
Why? No DC grand jury is going to have the guts to go after him.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:03 pm to KCT
It’s a moot point because no one is getting indicted. Not just Obama, I can guarantee not a single indictment will be made. Bookmark this post.
I’ve scoured documents, pubs, and this site for something of substance on this issue & all I’ve gotten is:
1. People pretending that Mueller, Senate Committee, and Ratcliffe reports didn’t happen + Russia did nothing.
2. People pretending the investigation was focused on “vote fixing” or calling election results into question, rather than national security.
Gabbard’s narrative ignores:
1. The three agreeing reports
2. The fact that the senate was on the verge of launching its own investigation prior to the election
3. Revises history to suggest none of this was an issue until after the election.
There’s no new info here & believing Russia didn’t aggressively target the US in 2016 at this point requires one to exist in an alternate reality.
I’ve scoured documents, pubs, and this site for something of substance on this issue & all I’ve gotten is:
1. People pretending that Mueller, Senate Committee, and Ratcliffe reports didn’t happen + Russia did nothing.
2. People pretending the investigation was focused on “vote fixing” or calling election results into question, rather than national security.
Gabbard’s narrative ignores:
1. The three agreeing reports
2. The fact that the senate was on the verge of launching its own investigation prior to the election
3. Revises history to suggest none of this was an issue until after the election.
There’s no new info here & believing Russia didn’t aggressively target the US in 2016 at this point requires one to exist in an alternate reality.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:04 pm to HEtiger
quote:This is the way.
There is no presidential immunity when he is OUT of office. So, his actions, communications, etc. after Trump’s inauguration are the keys to downtown.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:04 pm to DeathByTossDive225
Deathbycte still at it lol.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:06 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
There’s no new info here & believing Russia didn’t aggressively target the US in 2016 at this point requires one to exist in an alternate reality.

Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:06 pm to Jbird
quote:
Deathbycte still at it lol.
The whole board is still at it.
Bookmark the posts & let me know when there’s one indictment. I’m not a big Obama fan, but stupid is stupid.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 4:08 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:08 pm to DeathByTossDive225
Your line about indictments cracks me up.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:10 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
DeathByTossDive225
Oh shite. This moron still believes Trump was a Russian asset.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:11 pm to Jbird
Why? Who’s getting indicted?
I will be shocked if DOJ so much as opens an investigation because there is no new information here & Gabbard’s narrative contradicts the current CIA’s report from like… a week ago
I will be shocked if DOJ so much as opens an investigation because there is no new information here & Gabbard’s narrative contradicts the current CIA’s report from like… a week ago
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:11 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
I’ve scoured documents, pubs, and this site for something of substance on this issue & all I’ve gotten is
Awesome. Glad you did your due diligence.
quote:
There’s no new info here & believing Russia didn’t aggressively target the US in 2016 at this point requires one to exist in an alternate reality
Damnit. I was really believing in you. You really let me down on this.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:11 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Oh shite. This moron still believes Trump was a Russian asset.
TigerQuack alter?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 4:12 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
Bookmark the posts & let me know when there’s one indictment. I’m not a big Obama fan, but stupid is stupid.
There won’t be indictments. However, citing three investigations that relied on falsified evidence as evidence there was no falsification of evidence is so completely moronic, even you should see that.
Popular
Back to top


21






