- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If He Needs to, Can Obama Successfully Claim "Presidential Immunity" For His Crimes?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:04 pm to Jbird
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:04 pm to Jbird
Not what this is.
What’s your supporting evidence? Some tweets from Gabbard & a single line that states “we don’t suspect they hacked voting machines”. That’s news?
No reports ever stated they did.
Also DHS is not DNI.
What’s your supporting evidence? Some tweets from Gabbard & a single line that states “we don’t suspect they hacked voting machines”. That’s news?
No reports ever stated they did.
Also DHS is not DNI.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 5:07 pm
2
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
You asserted that very thing through your verbose diarrhea from your piehole. Words mean things, pinhead.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 5:07 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:06 pm to DeathByTossDive225
Knocked off early from Mickey D's, eh? 
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:07 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
There’s no new info here & believing Russia didn’t aggressively target the US in 2016 at this point requires one to exist in an alternate reality.
Wow. Remember when Mueller claimed the Russian troll farm was linked to the Russian government, yet when they took them to court, Mueller's prosecutors were in jeopardy of being held in criminal contempt of court due to the public allegations not being explicit in the indictment?
IOW, no Russian government involvement.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 5:08 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:07 pm to Houag80
quote:
Knocked off early from Mickey D's
Well, you’ve convinced me.
Common for aggies to resort to personal attacks when they can’t come up with a substantial retort.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:11 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
On July 13, 2018, a federal grand jury sitting in the District of Columbia returned an indictment
Don’t know how easy it is to get an indictment? You are aware of the phrase “indict a ham sandwich”, right?
quote:
Russia has been using social media platforms to attack political enemies since at least 2013
Like I said. fricking Facebook posts. You dumb idiot.
quote:
Now you could just go read the Senate committee or Ratcliffe’s report, but I realize none of this will snap you out of the daydream.
You are citing Wikipedia. Dumb idiot. And nothing you posted is probative. At all. You’re parading around Facebook posts as your interference. Pathetically uneducated and ignorant…you did exactly what I knew you would.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 5:12 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:11 pm to DeathByTossDive225
Your retarded rambling has not been worthy of a serious retort. Moreover, I fart in your direction...breathe it in, probably the best thing you've smelled in a month.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:12 pm to Cuz413
quote:
IOW, no Russian government involvement.
Excellent example of cherry picking a single point of contention over the course of three separate investigations from three separate entities & drawing a broad, sweeping hyperbolic conclusion that neglects the overall consensus.
Unsurprising given that is essentially the entire basis of this theory.
I am not above eating crow. Let me know when one single person — doesn’t have to be Obama, just one guy — gets indicted.
If you don’t think anyone will be indicted, why?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:13 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
I am not above eating crow. Let me know when one single person — doesn’t have to be Obama, just one guy — gets indicted.
Such a dumb litmus test.
quote:
If you don’t think anyone will be indicted, why?
Because it’s not politically expedient. How dumb are you?
I absolutely love how I’ll-informed and naive you are. Zero legal acumen, but still posting like you’re an expert. Anyone with a modicum of experience is just laughing at you and your naivety.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:15 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You are citing Wikipedia. Dumb idiot. And nothing you posted is probative. At all. You’re parading around Facebook posts as your interference.
None of this is true. In fact, I have never cited Wikipedia. In fact, I have not mentioned Facebook in this thread.
That wasn’t even a strawman it’s just dementia.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:17 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
None of this is true. In fact, I have never cited Wikipedia. In fact, I have not mentioned Facebook in this thread.
Your quote mentioned social media. You are aware of what social media that was, right? I, at least, gave you credit for knowing that much. Amazing you weren’t even aware of the most basic facts. Perhaps you should read the reports. Dumb idiot.
quote:
That wasn’t even a strawman it’s just dementia.
You don’t know what you don’t know. You’re a useful idiot. Not dementia for you. Just willing to be a pawn and willfully ignorant. I would too if I had your obvious limitations.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:17 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Zero legal acumen, but still posting like you’re an expert.
Projection. Indicting guilty parties other than former presidents isn’t politically expedient?
I’m not saying it should have happened by now, I’m telling you it will not & I will eat crow if it does.
You are hedging your bet.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 5:18 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:20 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
Zero legal acumen
quote:
Projection.
oh my. quote:
Indicting guilty parties other than former presidents isn’t politically expedient?
The thread is about a former President you fricking nerd.
quote:
I’m not saying it should have happened by now, I’m telling you it will not & I will eat crow if it does.
I’m not arguing that. I’m mocking you for not even being aware the fricking Facebook posts are what you claim to be proof of Russian interference. You have to be a dumb mother fricker to die on that hill.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:21 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Your quote mentioned social media.
One of the 5 quotes in that post mentioned social media?
Ope, guess there’s no evidence of Russian interference.
Also, which source was Wikipedia? You’re out of your depth BB.
quote:
Thread is about a former president
You’re responding to me & I said no one will be indicted. Zero indictments. I’m not qualifying it.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:23 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
oh my
TELL HIM ABOUT YOUR LLM, BIG DOG!!!
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 5:24 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:24 pm to KCT
If you cannot pardon for treason, I don't think you can have presidential immunity for it either.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:25 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
Excellent example of cherry picking a single point of contention over the course of three separate investigations from three separate entities & drawing a broad, sweeping hyperbolic conclusion that neglects the overall consensus.
Hold the frick up.
You made this statement:
quote:
& believing Russia didn’t aggressively target the US in 2016 at this point requires one to exist in an alternate reality
I post a fact of Mueller taking his claim of Russia to court, they got their asses kicked, and your response is I cherry picked.
If Russian aggressively targeted the US in 2016, why couldn't any of the investigations prove it?
But keep on sucking in that propaganda about mean ole Russia. When the threats to our rights and liberties are being taken by the very same people who say they are protecting us from a country that can't do jack shite.
"We have always been at war with Eastasia"
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:25 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
One of the 5 quotes in that post mentioned social media? Ope, guess there’s no evidence of Russian interference.
That was the interference. Jesus. It was Facebook posts.
quote:
Also, which source was Wikipedia? You’re out of your depth BB.
Link your source and let’s see who is out of their depth.
quote:
You’re responding to me & I said no one will be indicted. Zero indictments. I’m not qualifying it.
You should go back and look at what I responded to. Your idiotic take that there was some grand Russian interference scheme. Link…precisely…what the Russians did to interfere. Be specific. And link your source.
I’m the one “projecting” legal acumen.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:26 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
TELL HIM ABOUT YOUR LLM, BIG DOG!!!
your usual quality post. Tell us about sandman’s settlement big dog!! And its LL.M. You’d know that if…well…you know. This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 5:28 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 5:29 pm to WeeWee
quote:
Why? No DC grand jury is going to have the guts to go after him.
His criminal conspiracy extended into Florida, this is where his pending indictment is.
Page 4 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News