- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Oakmont bans Wyndham Clark after Locker Damage
Posted on 7/16/25 at 3:38 pm
Posted on 7/16/25 at 3:38 pm
So, Oakmont bans Clark for being an idiot and damaging the locker room. Of course, there are stipulations like paying for the damage, apologizing, and donating a set amount to a charity of the club board's choosing.
Of course Clark will do it just to save face. He's already apologized.
But, it begs the questions... assume he doesn't do that and the Open goes back to Oakmont while he still has an exemption to play. What supersedes? The ban they have, or his legit right to play?
Of course Clark will do it just to save face. He's already apologized.
But, it begs the questions... assume he doesn't do that and the Open goes back to Oakmont while he still has an exemption to play. What supersedes? The ban they have, or his legit right to play?
17
Posted on 7/16/25 at 3:40 pm to hogwildinhouston
quote:
Of course Clark will do it just to save face.
He’s an insane person and one of the most out of touch golfers in the game. Dude had one nice run for a year and thinks his opinion carries weight in the game. Can’t wait for this guy to return to mule status
Posted on 7/16/25 at 3:42 pm to hogwildinhouston
Thug POS
Posted on 7/16/25 at 3:51 pm to hogwildinhouston
quote:
But, it begs the questions... assume he doesn't do that and the Open goes back to Oakmont while he still has an exemption to play. What supersedes? The ban they have, or his legit right to play?
He doesn't have a legit right to play there if the facility banned him. He shouldn't have thrown his little tantrum. Act like a professional and not a toddler.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 3:55 pm to hogwildinhouston
frick Wyndham Clark.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 4:00 pm to hogwildinhouston
Any normal individual would have paid to repair the locker and that would have been the end of it.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 4:02 pm to usc6158
I’m cool with dudes raging but tear your own shite up, bit somebody else’s. And if you do don’t be a complete a-hole about it when you get called out
Posted on 7/16/25 at 4:03 pm to hogwildinhouston
quote:
while he still has an exemption to play.
Who determines this
Posted on 7/16/25 at 4:04 pm to usc6158
quote:
Any normal individual would have paid to repair the locker and that would have been the end of it.
Is that not what happened?
Posted on 7/16/25 at 4:05 pm to TackySweater
quote:
Is that not what happened?
Why are you always so confused lol
Posted on 7/16/25 at 4:05 pm to hogwildinhouston
quote:
But, it begs the questions... assume he doesn't do that and the Open goes back to Oakmont while he still has an exemption to play.
This will happen in 2033
Posted on 7/16/25 at 4:07 pm to TackySweater
quote:
Is that not what happened?
Per Oakmont, no. He didn't pay.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 4:10 pm to TackySweater
quote:
Who determines this
lol his US Open win in 2023
This post was edited on 7/16/25 at 4:11 pm
Posted on 7/16/25 at 4:12 pm to JimTiger72
The fact that a millionaire didn't pay for damages he created simply blows my mind. I honestly can't hate him enough.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 4:13 pm to hogwildinhouston
quote:
Of course, there are stipulations like paying for the damage, apologizing, and donating a set amount to a charity of the club board's choosing.
They are also requiring that he get anger management classes. A step too far by the club IMO.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 4:16 pm to SloaneRanger
quote:
They are also requiring that he get anger management classes. A step too far by the club IMO.
He clearly needs them. He’s had several unmitigated outbursts.
And he’s free not to return if he doesn’t want to
Posted on 7/16/25 at 4:32 pm to JimTiger72
quote:
This will happen in 2033
Well if he’s banned from the premises…
Posted on 7/16/25 at 4:33 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
Any dude named Wyndham is going to be an incredible douche.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 5:18 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Why are you always so confused lol
Surely there’s a difference between confusion and asking for extra info.
In this case, you are in fact confused lol
But yea nice gotcha!!!
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News