- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SCOTUS rules on DOGE.... in favor of!
Posted on 6/6/25 at 4:45 pm
Posted on 6/6/25 at 4:45 pm
The Supreme Court on Friday handed the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) two major victories in its expanding legal battle over drastic efforts to reshape the federal bureaucracy.
In two separate emergency rulings issued simultaneously, the court lifted a block on DOGE personnel accessing sensitive Social Security Administration (SSA) systems and wiped a ruling forcing DOGE to turn over discovery in a records lawsuit.
In the Social Security case, the justices lifted a Maryland-based federal judge’s order blocking DOGE from snooping around the SSA’s systems that contain personally identifiable information, including Social Security numbers, medical and mental health records, bank data, and earnings history.
The Supreme Court’s second emergency decision stems from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against DOGE.
LINK
In two separate emergency rulings issued simultaneously, the court lifted a block on DOGE personnel accessing sensitive Social Security Administration (SSA) systems and wiped a ruling forcing DOGE to turn over discovery in a records lawsuit.
In the Social Security case, the justices lifted a Maryland-based federal judge’s order blocking DOGE from snooping around the SSA’s systems that contain personally identifiable information, including Social Security numbers, medical and mental health records, bank data, and earnings history.
The Supreme Court’s second emergency decision stems from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against DOGE.
LINK
Posted on 6/6/25 at 6:09 pm to BCreed1
Hopefully they find more cuts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 6:12 pm to BCreed1
The court ruled to expand government power and deny taxpayers the ability to see what the government is doing.
Another victory for small government conservative. “THIS is what I voted for”
Another victory for small government conservative. “THIS is what I voted for”

This post was edited on 6/6/25 at 6:15 pm
Posted on 6/6/25 at 6:16 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
The court ruled to expand government power and deny taxpayers the ability to see what the government is doing. Another victory for small government conservative. “THIS is what I voted for”
You're stupid and your attempted gotcha is ineffectual.
I hope you aren't awarded your doctorate in whatever retarded program would accept you and if you are awarded it I hope you fail at ever being able to use it.
That hope is for the betterment of the world.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 6:19 pm to BCreed1
Look who dissented. 3 of the 4 females on the court. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented
Posted on 6/6/25 at 6:20 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
You're stupid and your attempted gotcha is ineffectual.
I hope you aren't awarded your doctorate in whatever retarded program would accept you and if you are awarded it I hope you fail at ever being able to use it.
That hope is for the betterment of the
All those words and not one of them addresses the topic of this thread.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 6:29 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
The court ruled to expand government power



Posted on 6/6/25 at 6:31 pm to 4cubbies
quote:How does defunding and cutting of government programs "expand government power"
All those words and not one of them addresses the topic of this thread.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 6:34 pm to 4cubbies
They are trying to bring everything into the open for taxpayers to see. It’s amazing how your brain works. You don’t hide the fact that you are liberal do you. Really sad.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 6:38 pm to 4cubbies
You should cry harder
This post was edited on 6/6/25 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 6/6/25 at 6:50 pm to BCreed1
How long has Roberts been sitting on this waiting for something to blow up with Elon? 

Posted on 6/6/25 at 7:01 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
How does defunding and cutting of government programs "expand government power"
It doesn’t. But allowing an additional agency and additional bureaucrats access to our private information does.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 7:03 pm to Bourre
You should close your browser and take some deep breaths. Or keep it open and look at cute animals. You don’t have to be a miserable wretch. At some point, it became a choice.
This post was edited on 6/6/25 at 7:03 pm
Posted on 6/6/25 at 7:13 pm to 4cubbies
quote:Satire? The idea that the executive branch cannot manage the affairs of the executive branch is so silly it should have never gotten this far in the court system. Glad it got clarified quickly.
The court ruled to expand government power and deny taxpayers the ability to see what the government is doing.
Otherwise the IRS would become its own branch of un-elected co-equal branch government with zero oversight from…. anyone. Is that what you want?
This post was edited on 6/6/25 at 7:18 pm
Posted on 6/6/25 at 7:17 pm to leeman101
quote:
Look who dissented. 3 of the 4 females on the court. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented
If they ever have the majority, the country will be engulfed in armed revolution.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 7:22 pm to 4cubbies
quote:Are you sure?
But allowing an additional agency and additional bureaucrats access to our private information does.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 7:24 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
The court ruled to expand government power and deny taxpayers the ability to see what the government is doing.
You will never be able to quantify this with anything of substance.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 7:25 pm to leeman101
quote:
Look who dissented. 3 of the 4 females on the court. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented
Anyone have a link to the dissent?
Posted on 6/6/25 at 7:26 pm to leeman101
What is a female? You are confusing Ketanji.
Popular
Back to top
