Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Should VOO be the default S&P index?

Posted on 6/3/25 at 4:57 pm
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
8883 posts
Posted on 6/3/25 at 4:57 pm
Seems everywhere you look, VOO is trumpeted as the ETF for an S&P index fund in a retirement portfolio. But should it be?

VOO
P/E-26
Yield-1.29%
Fee-.03
1yr-12.06
3yr-12.14
5yr-15.57


What about SPMO? This fund seems to be clearly a better option. What am I missing?

SPMO
P/E-29.62
Yield-.49%
Fee-.13
1yr-25.39
3yr-20.70
5yr-20.24

Both very low fees, performance SPMO crushes VOO. VOO has a better dividend but not even close to closing the gap in performance. Both are tech heavy but SPMO is has large positions in retail with WMT and COST. VOO’s top holding is AAPL, while SPMO doesn’t have AAPL in its top ten holdings.

I think SPMO is the better hold.
Posted by tigercross
Member since Feb 2008
4940 posts
Posted on 6/3/25 at 5:04 pm to
I buy SPLG instead of VOO due to the lower expense ratio
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
8883 posts
Posted on 6/3/25 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

I buy SPLG instead of VOO due to the lower expense ratio



I guess that where I get lost….you’re saving 0.11% on fees but giving up 8-10% in performance.

Does an average person really notice the difference in fees when comparing 0.13% and 0.02%?

Not criticizing your choice…you know your situation better than I.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
71641 posts
Posted on 6/3/25 at 5:12 pm to
I’m no expert, but in the long run, shouldn’t most ETFs of a similar nature tend towards equal rates of return? If one is consistently outperforming, shouldn’t market forces kick in to equalize things?
Posted by tigercross
Member since Feb 2008
4940 posts
Posted on 6/3/25 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

I guess that where I get lost….you’re saving 0.11% on fees but giving up 8-10% in performance


Where are you getting your data? SPLG is 1 bp better YTD and 15 bp better over the last 5 years. Can’t go back further than 5 years since SPLG was not indexed to s&p 500 prior to 2020.

LINK

LINK

This post was edited on 6/3/25 at 5:30 pm
Posted by AlteriorMotive
Getting a little bit yipee
Member since Mar 2025
148 posts
Posted on 6/3/25 at 6:14 pm to
Well, SPMO is not an S&P index fund for starters, it is more volatile and benefits during strong bull runs.

If you’re interested in a higher risk version of S&P, this seems like a good one, or a Nasdaq one.

VOO matches the S&P point for point, and thus is the better hold for me. I actually use Fidelity’s FXAIX for my retirement funds, which has a slightly lower cost than VOO
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2683 posts
Posted on 6/3/25 at 6:20 pm to
SPMO isnt an S&P500 index fund (capitalization weighted). Rather, it tracks the S&P500 Momentum Index. The S&P 500 Momentum Index is a factor-based index that zeroes in on S&P 500 stocks with high momentum (strong recent performance).

Same pool of companies (S&P500) but entirely different weighting strategies. ETA: SPMO doesnt even hold the entire 500 just 100 selected holdings.
Apples to oranges. Interesting, to consider another approach but not sure if it's back tested as I've never heard anyone suggest this momentum index before. Basically looks like it is betting on recent strong performers.


I actually prefer the lower dividend in taxable brokerage. Wonder if there is a lower expense ratio version. Thats high for passively tracking an index.
This post was edited on 6/3/25 at 7:33 pm
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2683 posts
Posted on 6/3/25 at 6:41 pm to
SPMO also much more concentrated. Top 10 holdings account for ~54% of holdings vs VOO 34%.
This post was edited on 6/3/25 at 6:51 pm
Posted by Fat Bastard
2024 NFL pick'em champion
Member since Mar 2009
82518 posts
Posted on 6/3/25 at 10:10 pm to
so is SPY

who cares??
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
31217 posts
Posted on 6/3/25 at 10:37 pm to
I have Fidelitys FXAIX and it’s basically the same exact thing but expense ratio is .015%.
Posted by Fat Bastard
2024 NFL pick'em champion
Member since Mar 2009
82518 posts
Posted on 6/3/25 at 10:44 pm to
damn.

VOO is .03.

SPY is .09
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
8883 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 8:07 am to
quote:

Well, SPMO is not an S&P index fund for starters, it is more volatile and benefits during strong bull runs.



Ahhh, thus the better returns. Pretty good reason for it not to be a great S&P index holding
Posted by Nole Man
Somewhere In Tennessee!
Member since May 2011
8108 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 8:30 am to
I've used Fidelity® 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) for years for mirroring the S&P 500 since my accounts are at Fidelity. Near mirror performances. Slightly less expenses.
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
13860 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 10:03 am to
Sp500 funds are my largest position.

I started buying momentum funds within the past year. I like SPMO because it isn't as tech heavy as most of the other funds, including voo.

I don't think spmo did any worse than voo during the recent drop, and is now at all time high, whereas voo is still down a few points.

I'm 43 and shifting away from individual equities (and still not even thinking about bonds). I'll continue buying voo, spmo and other growth funds (MGK, schg)
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram