Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Life Insurance - approaching and into retirement

Posted on 5/15/25 at 5:39 pm
Posted by Artificial Ignorance
Member since Feb 2025
522 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 5:39 pm
Do I need it?

Retirement nest egg was complete a few years now. Was not ready to retire. Am thinking will do so in next year or so.

Looking back, and currently, thinking I am wasting money. If I kicked bucket tomorrow, spouse has nest egg, pension and SS cash flow to last until she meets me in next life.

What is case for life insurance in retirement in this context? Any?
Posted by bigjoe1
Member since Jan 2024
907 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 5:54 pm to
If your spouse doesn't need the proceeds I can't think of a reason to keep the policy.
Posted by kaaj24
Dallas
Member since Jan 2010
800 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 6:04 pm to
I would only get it if you want to provide income to loved ones after your death.

However, if you already have a nest egg not sure I’d get insurance.

My term insurance ends in 6 years and I won’t renew
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
18283 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 6:05 pm to
No one needs life insurance.

Do you want it, is the question.

And you gave no info on the policy type, so no advice i can offer.
Posted by Roscoe14
Member since Jul 2021
285 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 6:12 pm to
Term life (which I am assuming is what you have) is for income replacement. In other words, it is to protect your loved ones from losing your income. But, if you aren't earning income than it doesn't make sense anymore. In that case, you are just gambling with the insurance company, with the odds in its favor.
Posted by ItzMe1972
Member since Dec 2013
11503 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 6:15 pm to
Time to drop it. It provided protection while you built wealth.

And the funny thing you're going to die at some point, so life insurance is actually an oxymoron.
Posted by Ten Bears
Florida
Member since Oct 2018
4257 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 6:16 pm to
Depends. There are benefits to it. I have several whole life policies and the dividend covers the premium, so I can choose to either keep paying the premium to increase the cash value beyond the limits of the policy or I can sit on it and let the dividends cover the premium.

But these policies were purchased years ago, and if you are at, or near retirement, it doesn’t make sense unless you don’t have enough left for your family after your death.

One awesome aspect is they are all tax free to the beneficiary.

This post was edited on 5/15/25 at 8:37 pm
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2669 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 6:31 pm to
Need it? Probably not unless spouse would have more expenses or less income in your absence. For example to replace your SS benefit or pension. However, it might also make sense to keep paying if you think it's likely to pay off. (Assuming level term) you paid that same premium when younger and less likely to die might be worth paying until term expires now that you're more likely to die. Also, consider widow will likely have higher tax burden given same income filing single so tax free death benefit might be useful.
Posted by jfw3535
South of Bunkie
Member since Mar 2008
5232 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 7:06 pm to
Dropped ours years ago when the term ran out. Our kids are adults and self sufficient, we have no debt and a sufficient nest egg to get either of through life on a single income or retirement savings, so no reason to keep it.
Posted by dome53
Member since Apr 2009
1843 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 7:17 pm to
You need a term policy if you have small kids and your income is the only thing keeping the bills paid. Other than that, it’s a want.
Posted by Artificial Ignorance
Member since Feb 2025
522 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

Do I need it?


quote:

No one needs life insurance.


quote:

And you gave no info on the policy type, so no advice i can offer.


Yet you did. Thanks!
This post was edited on 5/15/25 at 7:41 pm
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
18283 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

Thanks!

Here to serve.

quote:

Not clear why non term insurance would matter. Please explain.

Permanent contracts are guaranteed, and while not a need, one may want to continue owning. Leverage options can be employed to unlock asset value. If you're healthy, term is simply death benefit you'd most probably outlive and holds no value. You seem to be satisfied with your asset holdings so term coverage is an expense you may not want to continue.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram