- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Diamondback Energy CEO: “Likely that U.S. onshore oil production has peaked”
Posted on 5/6/25 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 5/6/25 at 4:50 pm
quote:
U.S. onshore oil production has likely peaked and will start to decline due to the recent plunge in crude prices, jeopardizing the nation's position as the world's largest fossil fuel producer and its energy security, the CEO of Diamondback Energy told shareholders in a letter this week.
quote:
Adjusted for inflation, there have only been two quarters since 2004 when front-month oil prices have been as cheap as they are now, excluding 2020 when the Covid-19 pandemic swept the world, Diamondback CEO Travis Stice wrote.
"Therefore, we believe we are at a tipping point for U.S. oil production at current commodity prices," Stice warned the company's shareholders in a letter published Monday. "It is likely that U.S. onshore oil production has peaked and will begin to decline this quarter," Stice told investors in his letter, pointing to cuts in activity levels.
quote:
The shale revolution over the past 15 years has transformed the U.S. into the largest fossil fuel producer in the world, with the country pumping more oil and gas than Saudi Arabia and Russia combined, the CEO said.
"This has transformed our economy and given the United States a level of energy security not thought possible at the beginning of this century," Stice told investors. "Today's prices, volatility and macroeconomic uncertainty have put this progress in jeopardy," the CEO warned.
Depending on how much oil prices fall, the amount of capital needed for the U.S. to produce 13 million barrels per day and for the Permian to produce 6 million bpd "might be an untenable lift for the business model that we put in place, where we're returning so much back to our investors who own the company," Stice told analysts on Diamondback's earnings call Tuesday morning.
"We don't have a crystal ball in the rest of the world, but we have a very good view of what the U.S. looks like, and right now, that's a business that's slowing dramatically and likely declining in terms of production," Stice said.
The number of crews fracking shale for oil and gas has already fallen 15% this year with crews in the Permian Basin down 20% from a peak in January, Stice estimated, warning that number of crews will likely decline further.
quote:
"To use a driving analogy, we are taking our foot off the accelerator as we approach a red light," Stice said. "If the light turns green before we get to the stoplight, we will hit the gas again, but we are also prepared to brake if needed."
LINK
Posted on 5/6/25 at 4:55 pm to ragincajun03
Peak oil? Is it 1980 again?
This post was edited on 5/6/25 at 4:56 pm
Posted on 5/6/25 at 4:57 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
Diamondback Energy CEO
Not going to believe much coming out of his mouth.
quote:
In January 2024, a class action lawsuit was filed accusing Diamondback, along with seven other US oil and gas producers, of an illegal price-fixing scheme to constrain production of shale oil, allegedly leading to drivers in the US paying more for gasoline than they would have in a competitive market.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 2:40 pm to Shexter
We might have to tap the bazillion acres of land in Alaska
Posted on 5/7/25 at 2:42 pm to lsuoilengr
We’re gonna have some new land in Canada and Greenland soon too
Posted on 5/7/25 at 2:45 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Peak oil? Is it 1980 again?
He seems to mean that production will drop because of lower prices. Prices go up and more investment goes into exploration.
Not peak as in we can’t find oil anymore or will never boost production.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 2:45 pm to ragincajun03
Now that fracking is over maybe the tap water will stop catching on fire
Posted on 5/7/25 at 3:55 pm to lsuoilengr
quote:
We might have to tap the bazillion acres of land in Alaska
That North Slope pipeline will happen.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 3:58 pm to ragincajun03
The term "peak" is never used correctly
Posted on 5/7/25 at 3:58 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Peak oil? Is it 1980 again?
No, there is plenty of oil but cost to drill for and produce isn't cheap.
Utah's Uintah Basin is just cranking up but its very waxy and cannot be sent in pipelines.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 4:13 pm to lsuoilengr
quote:
We might have to tap the bazillion acres of land in Alaska
If it gets to a crisis and national security point, this will absolutely happen.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 4:20 pm to el Gaucho
LOL
This post was edited on 5/7/25 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 5/7/25 at 4:23 pm to ragincajun03
Better make sure we can get that stuff out of Alberta.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 4:26 pm to ragincajun03
He's not wrong. The cheaper oil is, the less sense it makes to invest heavy capital to retrieve and process it.
If you back off, it decreases supply and causes prices to increase to a profitable level.
The laws of economics can't be subverted. They are not subject to political needs.
If you back off, it decreases supply and causes prices to increase to a profitable level.
The laws of economics can't be subverted. They are not subject to political needs.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 4:27 pm to frequent flyer
quote:
Not peak as in we can’t find oil anymore or will never boost production.
As soon as the production rate falls in the US, it will be international news about the decline.
By the way, as someone who worked in the business for over thirty years, it is a finite resource. The US does not have the largest amount of oil reserves in the ground. Canada has more than twice the US unless we can find more in Alaska.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 4:59 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
By the way, as someone who worked in the business for over thirty years, it is a finite resource. The US does not have the largest amount of oil reserves in the ground. Canada has more than twice the US unless we can find more in Alaska.
I’m not disagreeing with your overall premise about it being a finite resource, but economics and technology play a pretty big part in what we consider to be “reserves”:

Maybe we never see another shale revolution. Who knows? But I’m not quite ready to worry about running out of US reserves when our proved reserves are currently higher than any time in US history prior to 2018.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:06 pm to lostinbr
quote:
Maybe we never see another shale revolution. Who knows? But I’m not quite ready to worry about running out of US reserves when our proved reserves are currently higher than any time in US history prior to 2018.
It's just Trump's drill baby drill sounds good. But drill baby drill is up to the oil companies. When they can't make the desired income on a project, they won't proceed with the project.
And then production falls and prices rise and a "boom" ensues until we get to the last boom. Think mining and all the mining towns out west. The mineral reserves played out. So in 100 years there will likely not be another oil boom. While that doesn't affect us, it will affect our progeny.
The CEO of the company may have reservations now about the ability of the onshore domestic oil business to continue the high side of the production curve.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:09 pm to ragincajun03
How much of this shite is going to be written into the next season of Landman?
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:30 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
It's just Trump's drill baby drill sounds good. But drill baby drill is up to the oil companies. When they can't make the desired income on a project, they won't proceed with the project.
And then production falls and prices rise and a "boom" ensues until we get to the last boom. Think mining and all the mining towns out west. The mineral reserves played out. So in 100 years there will likely not be another oil boom. While that doesn't affect us, it will affect our progeny.
The CEO of the company may have reservations now about the ability of the onshore domestic oil business to continue the high side of the production curve.
I understand how O&G economics work.
You said you’ve been in the industry 30 years. If so, proved reserves today are significantly higher than they were when you started. Will there be a “last boom” at some point? Sure. I just don’t think anyone can really predict when that will be. If it’s 100 years from now it could easily be due to demand effects rather than supply.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:30 pm to ragincajun03
That’s been said for 70 years.
Popular
Back to top
