Started By
Message
locked post

Car and Driver: 2025 4Runner TrailHunter Test

Posted on 4/29/25 at 6:33 am
Posted by Dragula
Laguna Seca
Member since Jun 2020
6615 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 6:33 am

2025 4Runner TrailHunter Test

quote:

Hybrid models churn out up to 326 horsepower and 465 pound-feet of torque.


quote:

The cabin certainly doesn't feel $60K­-plus nice, and I'm not sold on the benefits of the hybrid system. The lineup's overlap with the also-new Toyota Land Cruiser and Lexus GX550 further complicates matters. While there's a lot to like here, if I were in the market, I'd be very dis­cerning with the order form. —Mike Sutton


quote:

Modern powertrains are resilient. It's rare in our testing to observe a thermal overload, but with Toyota's latest hybrid configurations that power the Sequoia, the Tacoma, and the Tundra, we've noticed the transmission tem­peratures flirting with the red zone. The same goes for the new 4Run­ner. After a handful of acceleration runs, the transmission heats up to the point that it up­shifts earlier in the tach swing, and the thrust is dialed back. We don't hear a fan blowing in an attempt to cool the transmission fluid, and the temps are very slow to recover. All this while testing in mild ambient conditions has us wondering how this gearbox would stand up to abuse in the dunes or in sweltering heat. —David Beard







This post was edited on 4/29/25 at 8:01 am
Posted by Hoyt
Alabama: The Beautiful
Member since Aug 2011
5641 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 6:36 am to
Boggles the mind
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
22640 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 6:39 am to
You act as if Chevy and ford trucks aren’t close to 100k?

Car prices across the board have been sky high since covid
Posted by Dragula
Laguna Seca
Member since Jun 2020
6615 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 6:41 am to
quote:

You act as if Chevy and ford trucks aren’t close to 100k?



Am I?

I must have missed that....


But since you mentioned it, those $100K trucks are 3/4-1-ton Diesels or very minimum large V8's that are designed to work as an adjunct for many professions in towing/construction, hauling things for a living.

This 4cylinder 4Runner is none of that...
This post was edited on 4/29/25 at 6:47 am
Posted by roadkill
East Coast, FL
Member since Oct 2008
2093 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 6:41 am to
Product of authoritarian government mandating consumer choices.
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
56852 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 6:42 am to
quote:

Chevy and ford trucks aren’t close to 100k?



Some are
Most aren't
Posted by Jack Daniel
Gold member
Member since Feb 2013
29005 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 6:57 am to
quote:

those $100K trucks are 3/4-1-ton Diesels or very minimum large V8's that are designed to work as an adjunct for many professions in towing/construction, hauling things for a living. This 4cylinder 4Runner is none of that

Exactly
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26564 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:11 am to
I see nothing here that is worth trading in my current 4Runner.

I sort of like it.....but my big problem with this thing is that it's only incrementally better in some ways than the model it replaces but costs $20K more. They do have $55K 4Runners - and for that price I might be able to overlook the buzzy 4 cylinder engine.....but those models also look like a rental car with black plastic over fenders, very plasticky interior, and boring color combinations.

In many ways it seems like a compliance vehicle - ditching the bulletproof reliable V6 and 5 speed in exchange for a turbo 4 cylinder hybrid. Consumers didn't ask for that.

I hope that Nissan and GM are seeing the MSRP on these 4Runners and consider making a 4 door SUV based off their Frontier and Canyon/Colorado.
This post was edited on 4/29/25 at 7:21 am
Posted by Gaston
Dirty Coast
Member since Aug 2008
41694 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:15 am to
Not one fricking person is going trail hunting in that POS. Their packages are the dumbest thing about Toyotas, but apparently Americans love tough sounding sporty names…your TRD is just a poser minivan.
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
38462 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:16 am to
And the $100K luxury diesel trucks are arguably a better value than this $60K 4 cyl...
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88742 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:17 am to
quote:

your TRD is just a poser minivan.


You have some absolutely ridiculous vehicle takes.
Posted by Gaston
Dirty Coast
Member since Aug 2008
41694 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:19 am to
You like the colors, it’s OK.

Build up an SR5 with real off-roading parts…but that’s fricking obvious, right?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88742 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:20 am to
quote:

You like the colors, it’s OK.


I don't own or want to own one of these. Your minivan comparison is just objectively stupid
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
38462 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:23 am to
I'm in the minority, but I'm not a huge hybrid fan.

The more I read, the more my opinion is that hybrids just add another complex system to a vehicle that is typically already very efficient.

In other words, too much sugar for a dime

Posted by Gaston
Dirty Coast
Member since Aug 2008
41694 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:25 am to
They are used exactly like a minivan 99.99% of the time, and that’s the truth. I went though car line for many years.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26564 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:28 am to
quote:

I'm in the minority, but I'm not a huge hybrid fan.



I might be sold on it if the battery didn't consume so much cargo space.

The right move for Toyota would have been to put the V6 from the Tundra in the 4Runner without the hybrid. That's give the vehicle more power without robbing the cargo space. It's not reliable, but that's likely a problem with the 4 cylinder turbo too.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88742 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:29 am to
quote:


They are used exactly like a minivan 99.99% of the time, and that’s the truth.


Cool, just like 99.99999% of all vehicles. What exactly is your point? No one should make anything besides minivans?
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33111 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:31 am to
I think you can get a full sized SUV from Toyota for the same price.

And the gold colored wheels look stupid. A brushed metallic would look better on it.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33111 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:32 am to
quote:

But since you mentioned it, those $100K trucks are 3/4-1-ton Diesels or very minimum large V8's that are designed to work as an adjunct for many professions in towing/construction, hauling things for a living.


I could get a very, very nice Tundra for the price of a 4Runner Trailhunter.

Maybe I'm alone here but I REALLY like the new Tundra 1794.
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
38462 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:33 am to
Yeah, all that 4cy stuff is bs.

You can build a powerful, reliable small displacement, but the only company doing that with any longevity is Porsche.

Eff a 4cyl in the Land Cruiser...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram