- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Without Jokic this bad Denver team would not sniff the playoffs
Posted on 4/22/25 at 7:29 pm
Posted on 4/22/25 at 7:29 pm
Jokic fatigue.
This post was edited on 4/22/25 at 7:35 pm
Posted on 4/22/25 at 7:42 pm to theballguy
Without Jordan the Looney Tunes are locked into a lifetime residency at Moron Mountain
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:05 pm to theballguy
Without possibly the greatest center ever i agree
Posted on 4/23/25 at 7:29 am to ManBearTiger
quote:
Without Jordan the Looney Tunes are locked into a lifetime residency at Moron Mountain
Really what this thread should be about to be truthful.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 8:41 am to theballguy
If the Clippers put the Joker to sleep in the first round, just understand that in the West, it is a lot more tradition than upset.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 8:09 pm to theballguy
How about another take.
Isn’t it easier to pad stats on a bad team if you are really good? And harder to pad stats on a really good team?
Just some food for thought
Isn’t it easier to pad stats on a bad team if you are really good? And harder to pad stats on a really good team?
Just some food for thought
Posted on 4/24/25 at 3:42 pm to OU Guy
quote:
Isn’t it easier to pad stats on a bad team if you are really good? And harder to pad stats on a really good team?
Perhaps but I don't see how that has anything to do with Jokic.
Posted on 4/24/25 at 3:50 pm to theballguy
with him, first round loss.
Without, no playoffs.
Shai
With him, jeez who knows maybe the title
Without, first rd loser
Now what is more valuable
Taking a team from out of the playoffs to a rd 1 loser. Or taking a team from a rd 1 loser to who knows how far?
Without, no playoffs.
Shai
With him, jeez who knows maybe the title
Without, first rd loser
Now what is more valuable
Taking a team from out of the playoffs to a rd 1 loser. Or taking a team from a rd 1 loser to who knows how far?
Posted on 4/24/25 at 3:56 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
Now what is more valuable
Taking a team from out of the playoffs to a rd 1 loser. Or taking a team from a rd 1 loser to who knows how far?
Since the MVP is based on regular season I'd say leading your team to the #1 seed and a matchup wit the Grizzlies is more valuable.
If just raising your team's potential is used to determine who is the most valuable to their team should we throw Embiid in the mix? They finished last in their division behind the Nets without him.
This post was edited on 4/24/25 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 4/24/25 at 4:04 pm to OU Guy
Not necessary, there are a lot of other factors that play into either scenario.
Posted on 4/24/25 at 6:27 pm to OU Guy
quote:
How about another take. Isn’t it easier to pad stats on a bad team if you are really good? And harder to pad stats on a really good team? Just some food for thought
Next time, keep takes such as these to yourself. I know Oklahoma is new to the NBA but let me give you 2 easy examples for you to think on young fella
Shaq averaged 38 ppg in the fricking Finals. Jordan averaged 31 ppg in the playoffs for his career with 6 titles.
Were the 90s Bulls and 00-03 Lakers bad teams?
Next time, bounce this take off somebody with a brain in person before posting it on the internet.
Posted on 4/24/25 at 6:28 pm to Tigerpride18
quote:
doesn't matter,won title
Heh true.
Posted on 4/24/25 at 6:33 pm to Frac the world
quote:
Next time, keep takes such as these to yourself. I know Oklahoma is new to the NBA but let me give you 2 easy examples for you to think on young fella
Shaq averaged 38 ppg in the fricking Finals. Jordan averaged 31 ppg in the playoffs for his career with 6 titles.
Were the 90s Bulls and 00-03 Lakers bad teams?
Next time, bounce this take off somebody with a brain in person before posting it on the internet.
You actually made mu point.
Jokic has an easier time to get stats on a less than great team.
SGA has a harder time on a great team yet out up great stats.
Kinda shows why SGA will be MVP.
Posted on 4/24/25 at 6:51 pm to OU Guy
Your thesis makes literally zero sense
Jokic has put up historical, all time NBA history type stats. He’s in the all time record books for this year. That’s regardless of team success, nobody has ever done it.
SGA is in a loooooong line of 30 pt scorers with nothing other than that to show for it, other than historic Free Throw hunting
Jokic has put up historical, all time NBA history type stats. He’s in the all time record books for this year. That’s regardless of team success, nobody has ever done it.
SGA is in a loooooong line of 30 pt scorers with nothing other than that to show for it, other than historic Free Throw hunting
Posted on 4/24/25 at 6:53 pm to OU Guy
Not true, how many 30ppg players on losing teams in NBA history? How many on winning teams? I think it’s something like 85 of the 89 times it’s happened it’s been players for playoff teams. When you’re the only good player other teams focus on you alone which makes it harder to produce.
Posted on 4/24/25 at 7:21 pm to Madking
quote:
Not true, how many 30ppg players on losing teams in NBA history? How many on winning teams? I think it’s something like 85 of the 89 times it’s happened it’s been players for playoff teams. When you’re the only good player other teams focus on you alone which makes it harder to produce.
He led the 5th best team in NBA history. Thats facts and he will be MVP. Sucks to be other players trying to win MVP.
Posted on 4/24/25 at 7:23 pm to Frac the world
quote:
Your thesis makes literally zero sense
Jokic has put up historical, all time NBA history type stats. He’s in the all time record books for this year. That’s regardless of team success, nobody has ever done it.
SGA is in a loooooong line of 30 pt scorers with nothing other than that to show for it, other than historic Free Throw hunting
Jokic had more opportunity on a less than great team. All I’ve heard here from posters is how great he is at getting Denver to playoffs. Its much easier to pad stats in a team like that. Harder to do what SGA did.
Posted on 4/24/25 at 7:25 pm to Madking
quote:
WTF are you talking about?
Something Jokic fanbois won’t understand or comprehend
Popular
Back to top


7





