Started By
Message

House GOP leaders play hardball to stop Luna push for proxy voting for new parents

Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:15 am
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
35576 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:15 am
LINK

quote:

House Republican leaders are playing hardball as they try to stop Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) from triggering a vote on a bill to allow proxy voting for new parents, throwing a procedural hurdle at the push that will test the will of those who support Luna’s full-on legislative war against Republican leadership.

Using arcane parliamentary warfare, GOP leaders are preparing a vote for Tuesday that issues a dare to the Republican lawmakers: If you vote to support Luna and allow her proposal to come to the floor, you will halt action on other legislation that President Trump supports, including on limiting the power of federal judges and requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote.


quote:

Luna — who has long pushed for proxy voting for new moms and had her first child months into her first term — resigned from the House Freedom Caucus on Monday after members of the group pushed the Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) to be more aggressive in trying to kill her measure. She said in a resignation letter that “respect” among lawmakers in the group had been “shattered last week” and alleged that they threatened to halt floor action if the Speaker did not agree to their hardball tactics.

Luna earlier this month had gotten more than 200 House Democrats and about a dozen Republicans to sign a discharge petition to allow her to force floor action on the proxy voting resolution. The legislation itself is being led by Rep. Brittany Pettersen (D-Colo.), who had a child in January, and would allow members who give birth or lawmakers whose spouses give birth to designate another member to vote on their behalf for 12 weeks.


quote:

Discharge petitions are rarely successful, and amount to a major defiance of leadership. Johnson, arguing against the move to members last week, called it a “tool of the minority.”






Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
18460 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:17 am to
She can bring a bill up for vote at my house anytime.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:20 am to
Dumb bitch
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
5457 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:29 am to
If you can’t show up and vote in-person, then you shouldn’t be in Congress.

Luna’s measure is disgraceful. She needs to be voted out. Clearly she isn’t serious about being in Congress.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
79742 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:31 am to
That freedom caucus loves freedom eh
Posted by nes2010
Member since Jun 2014
7195 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:33 am to
Why is this a hill to die on? How many pregnant women per year are we talking about? 1 or 2?
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
5457 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:35 am to
They want to allow proxy voting for everyone in the House. The dems love it because they don’t have to show-up and can just have staffers voting. Many of their members are in poor health, would rather stay home in the west coast, etc.
Posted by L1C4
The Ville
Member since Aug 2017
15500 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:36 am to
Didn't Luna have a difficult time when her baby was born?

Do you want members to miss out on an important vote because they can't vote by proxy?
Posted by MemphisGuy
Germantown, TN
Member since Nov 2023
10918 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Luna’s measure is disgraceful. She needs to be voted out. Clearly she isn’t serious about being in Congress.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
79742 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Dumb bitch



Republicans trying to block this voted by proxy.


Republicans should be more pro family.



quote:

Anna Paulina Luna
@realannapaulina
I made the ask to just allow new moms to vote and they still said no. So we are here now. The argument here is no longer making sense. They say it is unconstitutional yet they voted by proxy.
This post was edited on 4/1/25 at 10:41 am
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
5457 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:40 am to
Then maybe this wasn’t the best time for her to run for Congress. She’s a public servant. If she can’t be there to vote in person, then she’s probably not the right person to represent her district in Washington.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
79742 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:42 am to
We need less abortions!

But if you are a mother you can't serve in government!

This post was edited on 4/1/25 at 10:43 am
Posted by jlnoles79
Member since Jan 2014
13818 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:42 am to
quote:

who has long pushed for proxy voting for new moms and had her first child months into her first term — resigned from the House Freedom Caucus on Monday


Why was a nanny stater like Anna Ocasio Luna in the Freedom Caucus to begin with
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
86969 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Why is this a hill to die on? How many pregnant women per year are we talking about? 1 or 2?



I don't get it either. It's self serving b/c she just had a kid I believe.
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
5457 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:44 am to
I know it’s unpopular these days to suggest that people in Congress put their district first over personal or family considerations. Public service necessarily involves difficult sacrifices.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
20128 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:46 am to
quote:

She’s a public servant.


And she wants women to be able to do their jobs they were voted in to do even if they are stuck in a hospital bed.

This seems like a really tone def view by GOP leadership. This is the equivalent of saying it is ok to fire a woman for being pregnant. The courts would have a field day with the lawsuits.
Posted by Wolfmanjack
Member since Jun 2017
1147 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:47 am to
Yea, you want to represent your constituents in congress then get your arse to the house and vote damn it. It’s your job!!!!!!
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
47335 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:47 am to
quote:

But if you are a mother you can't serve in government!

No one is saying this.
Posted by nes2010
Member since Jun 2014
7195 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:49 am to
quote:

They want to allow proxy voting for everyone in the House. The dems love it because they don’t have to show-up and can just have staffers voting. Many of their members are in poor health, would rather stay home in the west coast, etc.


Is that actually in the bill? Because the article says it is for pregnant mothers and their spouses. Not anyone that has poor health or wants to sit at home.
Posted by MemphisGuy
Germantown, TN
Member since Nov 2023
10918 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:49 am to
quote:

No one is saying this.

Except that's exactly what they are saying.

Just another instance of the Republican party not being able to get out of it's own damn way.
This post was edited on 4/1/25 at 10:51 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram