- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump wants to make new law re: fake news media
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:31 am
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:31 am
14
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:35 am to Proximo
Needs to crush that Wolf guy who wrote Fire and Furry
Imagine being a dumbarse like nawlinstiger, c on z, VOR etc believing these anonymous sources
Imagine being a dumbarse like nawlinstiger, c on z, VOR etc believing these anonymous sources
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:36 am to Proximo
So much for being an advocate of free speech. Fake news and "dishonest" books and articles are free speech, too.
Donnie starting to sound awfully European with wanting to go after publications in the courts
Donnie starting to sound awfully European with wanting to go after publications in the courts
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:37 am to Proximo
I could get behind a law that makes news articles sourced anonymously have a disclaimer at the top of the article that states something to the effect of: "Warning: The allegations contained in this article cannot be independently verified."
Maybe a rating system? "Sources Say" is not cutting it in any longer.
Maybe a rating system? "Sources Say" is not cutting it in any longer.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:40 am to Proximo
Judges already said it’s okay for journos to defame.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:41 am to KiwiHead
quote:
So much for being an advocate of free speech. Fake news and "dishonest" books and articles are free speech,
Not if they’re defamatory
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:41 am to Proximo
Yeah, this has always been the issue I've had with 'anonymous'.
Just like the number of 'hate' crimes reported during his first administration. 'This MAGA country' was the culmination of that crap. Way more turned our to be falsely reported, than anything else.
Just like the number of 'hate' crimes reported during his first administration. 'This MAGA country' was the culmination of that crap. Way more turned our to be falsely reported, than anything else.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:41 am to SallysHuman
We like our governmental interference with our information sources, do we?
Need to protect those in power. Huh?
If Trump isn't grown up enough to deal with the barrage of negative info that comes at him, then maybe he should have stayed in the private sector. Anonymous sources are part of the game....a lot of time those sources come from the inside.
Need to protect those in power. Huh?
If Trump isn't grown up enough to deal with the barrage of negative info that comes at him, then maybe he should have stayed in the private sector. Anonymous sources are part of the game....a lot of time those sources come from the inside.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:42 am to dgnx6
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. you wouldn't have fake news if you would just ask the right questions.Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:43 am to dgnx6
quote:
Judges already said it’s okay for journos to defame.
No shite huh? He essentially said in the tweet he wants the court to revisit NYT v Sullivan.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:43 am to KiwiHead
quote:
So much for being an advocate of free speech. Fake news and "dishonest" books and articles are free speech, too. Donnie starting to sound awfully European with wanting to go after publications in the courts
quote:
Rudy Giuliani has "fully satisfied" a $148-million defamation judgment related to false claims about two Georgia election workers.
Free speech right?
Right kiwi?
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:44 am to Proximo
Very important. This needs to happen. Kill the propaganda machine.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:44 am to KiwiHead
quote:
So much for being an advocate of free speech
Honestly how are you this stupid all the time?
Its a skill with you at this point
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:45 am to KiwiHead
quote:How many fricking times do I have to point out to you that "kiwi" is NOT a synonym for "dick"?
KiwiHead
Get a clue loser....
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:46 am to KiwiHead
Spreading false information is not a form of free speech.....they call that defamation.
And the MSM has done this to DJT for 10 years now!
State supported media MUST be stopped, NOW.
And the MSM has done this to DJT for 10 years now!
State supported media MUST be stopped, NOW.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:46 am to KiwiHead
quote:
We like our governmental interference with our information sources, do we?
Need to protect those in power. Huh?
Absolutely not. Disclaimers on certain products are not a new idea. I am not advocating limiting, censoring or otherwise interfering in what news outlets wish to publish. A simple disclaimer that what you are about to read are anonymous allegations without the ability to be independently verified would not affect what an outlet wishes to post.
Think of music, tv shows, movies, video games. No one interferes with production of such things- but there are content labels to warn people of what they are about to consume. Difference is, I would not advocate putting news stories behind age restrictions.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:46 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Imagine being a dumbarse like nawlinstiger, c on z, VOR etc believing these anonymous sources
EVERYBODY who has TDS is a fool on steroids. We finally have a fighting chance to rescue America from the twin evils of the Deep State and Globalism, and yet far too many are too blind to realize it.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:46 am to Proximo
quote:
No shite huh? He essentially said in the tweet he wants the court to revisit NYT v Sullivan.
I only read what’s in your post.
But I was still right.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:47 am to dgnx6
Again, thanks for playing we know what NYT v Sullivan says. He wants to revisit it.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 7:49 am to KiwiHead
quote:Slander isn’t appropriate just because it is in print.
Anonymous sources are part of the game....a lot of time those sources come from the inside.
Trump seemed to face a lot of false allegations from “insider” anonymous sources in his first term. It’s a great cover for the journalists: print something libelous, knowing it isn’t true, just to harm Trump, and use an unverifiable anonymous source as your excuse. You can say whatever you want.
What would stop them from completely making up something themselves and then just saying it came from an anonymous source?
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News