Started By
Message
locked post

TheAthletic's 2025 CFB early outlook (paywall)

Posted on 1/28/25 at 10:15 am
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
83264 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 10:15 am
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115610 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 10:18 am to
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
49969 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 10:20 am to
No Nuss in Heisman winners?

Good I needed something unimportant to get mad about
Posted by Raoul Stimulato
Hale Bopp Comet
Member since Sep 2022
2005 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 10:21 am to
We just finished a longasss season

Why you trying to get my blood pressure up lol

That said, thx for sharing
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216143 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 10:30 am to
The Odds off LSU at number 2 at winning the whole thing is basically impossible without Nuss being in the top 3 for Heisman votes.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 10:31 am to
Nuss not being a Heisman candidate but LSU being so highly regarded is super weird. They must love Cade Durham.
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
83264 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 10:33 am to
perhaps the switch gets turned on defensively, it's def a weird correlation

either way, heisman likely comes down to smith v. arch imo
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115610 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 10:53 am to
Micheal Van buren SZN
Posted by PP7 for heisman
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2011
8850 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Nuss not being a Heisman candidate but LSU being so highly regarded is super weird. They must love Cade Durham.

Nuss is atop the early odds I've seen.

I truly do not get the Arch hype. He looked good against UTSA (vast majoirty of yards were screens or coverage busts) and a horrible Mississippi State team, then looked average against ULM. I find it hard to believe he'll light it up in the horseshoe to start the season. They've also gotta go to Georgia and to Florida. He'll light up the G5 schools and look average in conference play.
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
127657 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 11:52 am to
Don’t do this to me.
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
58567 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 11:53 am to
is the Athletic worth a sub?
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80047 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 11:54 am to
quote:

I find it hard to believe he'll light it up in the horseshoe to start the season.


We are losing nearly our entire defense and DC.

I don't understand the Ohio State hype for next year.
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
83264 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 11:58 am to
sayin to smith and tate should keep you in most games, if not outright win them

your front 7 is where i would say the question mark is, but man caleb downs returning counts for alot imo
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
83264 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 11:59 am to
quote:

is the Athletic worth a sub?
meh, i find the cfb content pretty good on there, otherwise whatever
Posted by lsudirtbag
Prairieville
Member since Oct 2021
511 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 12:43 pm to
Arch....................so laughable.

Already sick of hearing about him and he has barely played.
Posted by moontigr
Commanders/LA Kings/Detroit Tigers
Member since Nov 2020
7025 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

No Nuss in Heisman winners?



Definitely gonna lay some $ down for him before the season when odds are first released
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
34470 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 1:38 pm to
So did everyone graduate at Indiana?
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
83264 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 1:40 pm to
dont think many, if any at all, see them catching lightning in a bottle twice
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8577 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 1:51 pm to
quote:


dont think many, if any at all, see them catching lightning in a bottle twice


I think they'll still be solid, but they lose 13 starters, including Rourke. I don't think that team was smoke and mirrors; they beat the shite out of everyone they played except Michigan, Notre Dame, and Ohio State.

The schedule is a little less generous: Illinois at home (if they're worth anything again), @Iowa, @Oregon, @Penn State, and Wisconsin at home. They also get UCLA who I think could be sneaky good next year.
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
83264 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 1:54 pm to
mendoza is decent to solid, think he can fit in well with cignetti
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram