- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Eastern conference executive says he would risk it all if Pels made Zion available
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:26 pm
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:26 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. For those that say he has no value and we would never get anything for him
11
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:29 pm to Soggymoss
A few teams desperate to win a ring like golden state will go all in for him. It’s worth the risk given there’s really no one else with his potential to be had
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:47 pm to Soggymoss
Start accumulating 1st rounders.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:52 pm to Soggymoss
I can BS on this. There isn't an Eastern team giving up their best assets for Zion. What team and what player(s)?
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:08 pm to brmark70816
quote:
I can BS on this. There isn't an Eastern team giving up their best assets for Zion. What team and what player(s)?
I mean lets take a team like Cleveland for example, you’re obviously not going to get Mitchell out of them, but they absolutely would throw Garland and every pick they have if they had picks.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:13 pm to Soggymoss
quote:
obviously not going to get Mitchell out of them, but they absolutely would throw Garland and every pick they have if they had picks.
So what is "all in" then?
The Cavs have no picks. So it would be Garland for Zion. I don't think the Cavs would do it, and it really doesn't help us any. But it's something.
I just don't see a team giving us a haul or a star player, like the OP is sayinf. Even his quote said, if he made the decisions. Which means he has no authority to make a move or a trade. He's just a big Zion believer. So it is a nothing burger..
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:15 pm to brmark70816
quote:
So what is "all in" then?
That would depend on the team involved, theres 29 teams that an all in offer would look different for because alot of them don’t have assets or they don’t have the salary or maybe restricted by the aprons.
Hard to say what an all in offer is unless you specify a team.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:24 pm to Soggymoss
Charlotte?
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:27 pm to Soggymoss
If it were him making decisions, but it isn't.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:31 pm to VL Lsutiger
quote:
Charlotte
That would look like:
Brandon Miller, Grant Williams, Micic and 3-4 picks for Zion, Jose and another minimum salary
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:32 pm to Soggymoss
I'm just saying charlotte due to he's from around that area and that's who would want him
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:35 pm to VL Lsutiger
quote:
I'm just saying charlotte due to he's from around that area and that's who would want him
I gotcha.
Yeah I think Charlotte, Nets, Heat, Pistons and 6ers are the most obvious “fits” for Zion that also have the assets to put together an all in offer for him. In the offseason you could add a few more teams to that.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:51 pm to Soggymoss
If I were making the decision......Another piece of garbage.
.
.
.
.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:04 pm to Soggymoss
quote:
Yeah I think Charlotte, Nets, Heat, Pistons and 6ers are the most obvious “fits” for Zion that also have the assets to put together an all in offer for him. In the offseason you could add a few more teams to that.
An "all in" for the Hornets would include Ball. The 76ers would have to be Embiid or Maxey. The Pistons would be Cunningham. The Nets would have to be a ton of picks, including this years lottery pick.
Just be realistic, none of that is going to happen. Maybe we'll just a high upside prospect and some protected picks. But no haul is coming..
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:14 pm to brmark70816
Bruh what 
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:24 pm to Soggymoss
I hope the Pels trade Zion for scraps to Washington or Charolette or Sacramento because F him
Posted on 1/1/25 at 7:11 pm to Soggymoss
quote:
I mean lets take a team like Cleveland for example, you’re obviously not going to get Mitchell out of them
Crazy, a couple years ago I was told on here Mitchell was the most overrated ‘star’ in the league. Now he’s untouchable.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 7:20 pm to Soggymoss
I don’t believe this for one second.
And if it’s even remotely true, then send his arse out of here at some point in the next 5 weeks.
And if it’s even remotely true, then send his arse out of here at some point in the next 5 weeks.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 7:23 pm to jamal
quote:
Bruh what
Look at the OP. The exec said his team, if he could, he'd go all in to get Zion.
Going all in isn't just a competitive offer. It should be a top end offer of the teams best asset or assets. Or a team dumping everything they have to put them over the top. Its a haul.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 7:30 pm to brmark70816
quote:
An "all in" for the Hornets would include Ball. The 76ers would have to be Embiid or Maxey. The Pistons would be Cunningham.
Ummm no…
All in offers are to pair a guy like Zion with Ball, Cade, Embiid or Maxey, not trading them away to get Zion.
Lakers went all in for AD, obviously they weren’t including Lebron in that.
Same for Phoenix, they went all in for Durant, but they obviously weren’t going to put Booker in the trade.
Knicks for Bridges, they went all in to pair him with Brunson.
An all in offer from a team that has a star player already won’t include that star player.
This post was edited on 1/1/25 at 7:34 pm
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News