- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

LSU may have third largest NIL collective per Brad Crawford of 247
Posted on 12/10/24 at 5:52 pm
Posted on 12/10/24 at 5:52 pm
Posted on 12/10/24 at 5:54 pm to jbraua
I never know who or what to believe when it comes to these things.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 5:55 pm to jbraua
somehow crawfish prices contributed to this, or they'll go up next year because of this!
Posted on 12/10/24 at 5:56 pm to jbraua
“Estimates”
Is think Brad is just guessing
Is think Brad is just guessing
Posted on 12/10/24 at 6:00 pm to jbraua
Yet Michigan went outside their collective and instantly doubled their spending potential
Posted on 12/10/24 at 6:04 pm to jbraua
Just makes being out of the top 25 that
much more embarrassing
much more embarrassing
Posted on 12/10/24 at 6:04 pm to Relham10
Collectives aren’t the measure this guy thinks it is.
Maybe collectives is where the consistent money will come from.. but some programs have billionaires who can stroke personal NIL deals for their team.
That will never be reflected in any of these types of lists
Maybe collectives is where the consistent money will come from.. but some programs have billionaires who can stroke personal NIL deals for their team.
That will never be reflected in any of these types of lists
Posted on 12/10/24 at 6:08 pm to jbraua
Of course they are the third largest. When you never spend money you just keep collecting.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 6:09 pm to Yaboylsu63
This is not accurate. It’s false. I wish it was true
Posted on 12/10/24 at 6:10 pm to jbraua
Okay, is that just the football designation?
Posted on 12/10/24 at 6:10 pm to JW6
Shhhh the tards are on a roll..
Posted on 12/10/24 at 6:11 pm to Yaboylsu63
Correct. None of these "rankings" are factoring in the "dark money" we all know exists outside the collectives. Not to say that money is dark as in not known about but not how much exactly and they don't factor that money into these collectives amounts.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 6:11 pm to Yaboylsu63
I think you are exactly right on this. LSU has really good base level NIL. What we lack is the people willing to throw millions at a single player like Underwood.
Also LSU was going to pay Underwood. I think it was estimated LSU was going to give him a $5-7 million deal. That’s more than competitive. You just can’t outspend billionaires who throw money around without worry though.
Also LSU was going to pay Underwood. I think it was estimated LSU was going to give him a $5-7 million deal. That’s more than competitive. You just can’t outspend billionaires who throw money around without worry though.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 6:12 pm to jbraua
Collective. It’s different when you have one guy shell out cash
Posted on 12/10/24 at 6:14 pm to fightvance
It's the individual billionaires that are taking us out.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 6:18 pm to jbraua
I’m sorry this just isn’t true
NIL collectives just dont post how much money they have
NIL collectives just dont post how much money they have
Posted on 12/10/24 at 6:29 pm to jbraua
I enjoyed this the first 14 times I saw it posted here.
Popular
Back to top


31






