- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What age do you think you'll retire and how much do you think you'll have
Posted on 10/18/24 at 9:20 am
Posted on 10/18/24 at 9:20 am
And do you think that'll be enough?
I've been doing the projections and I am targeting 60 at 2.5 million. Assuming a paid off house and kids' college paid for. The math suggests at that point I'd be able to live off the interest/dividends/growth in perpetuity with the money still growing. That's not even considering the addition of social security later.
So then I wonder if that's too much and maybe I shouldn't be quite so aggressive? Or keep up the aggression and call it early? Or maybe my math is wrong here?
I've been doing the projections and I am targeting 60 at 2.5 million. Assuming a paid off house and kids' college paid for. The math suggests at that point I'd be able to live off the interest/dividends/growth in perpetuity with the money still growing. That's not even considering the addition of social security later.
So then I wonder if that's too much and maybe I shouldn't be quite so aggressive? Or keep up the aggression and call it early? Or maybe my math is wrong here?
Posted on 10/18/24 at 9:41 am to Thundercles
I’m hoping for 55 with 2.5 in savings. I have a small side business that I hope to ramp up after retirement.
Currently at 1.3 plus a pension. This is not accounting for social security.
Currently at 1.3 plus a pension. This is not accounting for social security.
This post was edited on 10/18/24 at 9:51 am
Posted on 10/18/24 at 9:44 am to Thundercles
I'm hoping for 59 and I'm projecting somewhere around 1.5 to maybe 1.7 in my retirement accounts (401k and IRA). This doesn't include social security or my wife's retirement nor whatever we inherit from parents by that point in time. I'm comfortable with where I believe I'll be.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 9:46 am to TDsngumbo
Am I crazy with the math seeming like you'll have a ton left over? I was listening to Dave and a guy at 55 with 2.5 mil wanted to retire and wasn't sure and Ramsey said man, you've got so much you can live as long as you want.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 9:48 am to Thundercles
Actually I just looked at a retirement income analysis.
Assuming he lives 40 years after 55 and a 3% annual return in retirement, $2.5M would result in $9,013 a month in retirement income.
$9k a month in retirement would be good.
Assuming he lives 40 years after 55 and a 3% annual return in retirement, $2.5M would result in $9,013 a month in retirement income.
$9k a month in retirement would be good.
This post was edited on 10/18/24 at 9:50 am
Posted on 10/18/24 at 9:54 am to Thundercles
Somewhere between 50 and 52. Current projections put us at about 6-7m.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 10:01 am to Thundercles
My dad retired at 50. I set a goal for 45. It’s possible, but at that time it comes to how many more years I want to work to extend quality. It would be 4-5 mil in retirement holdings and 4-5 mil in paid off real estate and the. 1.5 in non qualified accounts.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 10:25 am to Thundercles
Unless you are already very close to 60, you have much more long term faith in Social Security and the USD in general than I do.
This post was edited on 10/18/24 at 10:26 am
Posted on 10/18/24 at 10:31 am to Thundercles
Dave is great for getting folks out of debt.
His retirement advice is terrible. He talks about taking 8% withdrawals which fails in many if not most scenarios.
4% is a more reasonable safe withdrawal rate which would only allow for $100k off of $2.5m in first year plus inflation increase annually. That has a 90+% success rate of not depleting nest egg over 30 yrs.
The issue is you cant bank on steady 8%+ market returns. If you have a down market, especially early in retirement, you'd rapidly deplete nest egg and never catch back up. Thats called "sequence of returns risk."
His retirement advice is terrible. He talks about taking 8% withdrawals which fails in many if not most scenarios.
4% is a more reasonable safe withdrawal rate which would only allow for $100k off of $2.5m in first year plus inflation increase annually. That has a 90+% success rate of not depleting nest egg over 30 yrs.
The issue is you cant bank on steady 8%+ market returns. If you have a down market, especially early in retirement, you'd rapidly deplete nest egg and never catch back up. Thats called "sequence of returns risk."
Posted on 10/18/24 at 10:38 am to Thundercles
I semi retired at 45. Just work part time as desired but dont need the $. Havent tapped into investments yet just living on military pension. We have enough in retirement and taxable to sustain our lifestyle at 4% SWR without pension. I'd like to hit $6m but that's just an arbitrary #
This post was edited on 10/18/24 at 10:47 am
Posted on 10/18/24 at 10:53 am to Thundercles
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/27/25 at 9:23 am
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:06 am to Thundercles
My target is $5M liquid (excluding home equity, exclude college savings). Whenever that happens -- I will not work until traditional retirement age.
I've started building some pretty advanced retirement modeling with ProjectionLab. Very easy to work different plans, goals, and monte carlo the simulations.
I've started building some pretty advanced retirement modeling with ProjectionLab. Very easy to work different plans, goals, and monte carlo the simulations.
This post was edited on 10/18/24 at 11:09 am
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:26 am to Thundercles
The "4%" rule, and a lot of other suggestions for retirement spending, are made for financially ignorant people. There's nothing at all wrong with going by it, it is relatively sound advice, but if the long term stock market return is greater than 10%, you can certainly do better most years if you want to accept the risk and burden of managing your own money.
I have posted my situation before. I retired at age 56 with about half as much assets as I thought I needed. I lost my job and decided I didn't want another one. When I really crunched the numbers, I decided since my bring home pay was half my salary anyway, I could continue to live the same lifestyle with half as much as I had planned. Three years in my outlook and assets have only improved.
If you expect to get a bunch of expensive hobbies, travel the world, or worse yet, buy a boat, then you better stick to the 4% rule or something more conservative. On the other hand, when you retire, you won't be contributing to 401K/IRA, and won't be paying FICA. You may not be paying into an HSA. You may not be paying for a house anymore. What you need out of a car might be a lot different. You might be able to keep your taxes in the (currently) 12% bracket and live very well. At least in my case, I spend a lot less money in retirement than I did while working.
Historic stock market returns are 10%+, but they are not consistent. It seems to me that there are many years where you could withdraw a lot more money then 4%, and then some years, where you better try to tighten up and not take as much. That sounds like something I have done all my life. So if I have been practicing to live like that so long, why can't I just decide what makes sense each year and take what I need/want?
I use the 4% to plan for spending, but I expect to tap it much more heavily at times based on conditions. However, once SS kicks in I won't even hit it for 4%, regardless of what age I take SS.
It's really the same as trying to lose weight. You know what you can eat every day, and you know that eating a little more one day won't really hurt in the long run if you get back on plan, but sometimes, you do have to adjust your plan.
I have posted my situation before. I retired at age 56 with about half as much assets as I thought I needed. I lost my job and decided I didn't want another one. When I really crunched the numbers, I decided since my bring home pay was half my salary anyway, I could continue to live the same lifestyle with half as much as I had planned. Three years in my outlook and assets have only improved.
If you expect to get a bunch of expensive hobbies, travel the world, or worse yet, buy a boat, then you better stick to the 4% rule or something more conservative. On the other hand, when you retire, you won't be contributing to 401K/IRA, and won't be paying FICA. You may not be paying into an HSA. You may not be paying for a house anymore. What you need out of a car might be a lot different. You might be able to keep your taxes in the (currently) 12% bracket and live very well. At least in my case, I spend a lot less money in retirement than I did while working.
Historic stock market returns are 10%+, but they are not consistent. It seems to me that there are many years where you could withdraw a lot more money then 4%, and then some years, where you better try to tighten up and not take as much. That sounds like something I have done all my life. So if I have been practicing to live like that so long, why can't I just decide what makes sense each year and take what I need/want?
I use the 4% to plan for spending, but I expect to tap it much more heavily at times based on conditions. However, once SS kicks in I won't even hit it for 4%, regardless of what age I take SS.
It's really the same as trying to lose weight. You know what you can eat every day, and you know that eating a little more one day won't really hurt in the long run if you get back on plan, but sometimes, you do have to adjust your plan.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:34 am to CharlesUFarley
quote:
Historic stock market returns are 10%+, but they are not consistent. It seems to me that there are many years where you could withdraw a lot more money then 4%, and then some years, where you better try to tighten up and not take as much. That sounds like something I have done all my life. So if I have been practicing to live like that so long, why can't I just decide what makes sense each year and take what I need/want?
You are aware that the "4%" rule does NOT mean you withdraw 4% of your portfolio every year, right?
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:40 am to beaverfever
quote:
you have much more long term faith in Social Security and the USD in general than I do.
Social security will be funded as long as the US government is solvent. If the US government becomes insolvent then we're all doing a Mad Max anyway.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:50 am to Thundercles
quote:
And do you think that'll be enough? I've been doing the projections and I am targeting 60 at 2.5 million. Assuming a paid off house and kids' college paid for. The math suggests at that point I'd be able to live off the interest/dividends/growth in perpetuity with the money still growing. That's not even considering the addition of social security later. So then I wonder if that's too much and maybe I shouldn't be quite so aggressive? Or keep up the aggression and call it early? Or maybe my math is wrong here?
Somewhere between 55 to 60 and I’m hoping 8 mil to 10 mil.
I’ve got 12 to 17 years to do it.
This post was edited on 10/18/24 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 10/18/24 at 12:08 pm to Rize
quote:
Somewhere between 55 to 60 and I’m hoping 8 mil to 10 mil.
Truly wondering, do you think you'll need / spend that much money or do you just want to accumulate a lot to pass on?
Posted on 10/18/24 at 12:11 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
You are aware that the "4%" rule does NOT mean you withdraw 4% of your portfolio every year, right?
What it means is dependent on who is promoting it.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 12:15 pm to CharlesUFarley
Well the most common interpretation of the rule is that you withdraw 4% of your portfolio in year 1 and then withdraw that same amount, adjusted for inflation, each year thereafter.
You're not supposed to look at your portfolio on January 1st each year and say "I can withdraw 4% of this number". That reintroduces SOR risk each year.
You're not supposed to look at your portfolio on January 1st each year and say "I can withdraw 4% of this number". That reintroduces SOR risk each year.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 12:16 pm to TorchtheFlyingTiger
quote:
I semi retired at 45. Just work part time as desired but dont need the $. Havent tapped into investments yet just living on military pension. We have enough in retirement and taxable to sustain our lifestyle at 4% SWR without pension. I'd like to hit $6m but that's just an arbitrary #
Yeah, I feel like I'd want to get to a good number and then take on a labor of love rather than pursuing the upper ends of a career I don't love.
Popular
Back to top
