Started By
Message
locked post

Doctors win lawsuit against Blue Cross Blue Shield

Posted on 9/25/24 at 7:26 pm
Posted by cbree88
South Louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
9566 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 7:26 pm
LINK

It’s worth $421 million. Good for the doctors for fighting them but I guess all of our premiums are probably going up even more now.
Posted by RedFoxx
New Orleans, LA
Member since Jan 2009
6601 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 7:28 pm to
It’ll get tied up in appeals and everyone will lose except for trial attorneys.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
128842 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 7:33 pm to
Yeah that will be reduced to nothing

BCBS had approved several providers but she wanted the bougie place

Posted by tLSU
Member since Oct 2007
8678 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 7:33 pm to
James Williams from the Board of Supervisors tried it.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
9376 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

That center and its specialty physicians are out of the Blue Cross network. She says Blue Cross Louisiana called her with names of in-network doctors who would cost less.


I would like to see the calculations for this award that a jury did in 2 hours. Being out of network they were likely getting a lower % and after a larger deductible and larger out of pocket maximum to be met by patient. The average rate they accept from other insurances would be important, because prices are always over quoted and what’s accepted is always lower.

quote:

Blue Cross Louisiana reprices it to Louisiana rates.
For surgeries done in Louisiana and by Louisiana doctors this doesn’t seem that out of the ordinary. If a patient comes to Louisiana from a very expensive to live state like Hawaii do the doctors get to charge them extra?
This post was edited on 9/25/24 at 7:59 pm
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
111987 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 7:50 pm to
CDC doing CDC things
Posted by suthrnpride
In the land of cotton
Member since Dec 2020
11 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:15 pm to
Maybe she just wanted the most advanced care and procedures that should be widely provided for these women?

I spent 8hrs at the center today while my mother underwent her 3rd surgery at this facility. Her previous double mastectomy surgery and reconstruction were done in MS; this led to the need of a reconstruction correction. Choosing these doctors and their facility didn’t have a mfn thing to do with wanting to go to a ‘bougie place’.

Insurance bs and inflated medical billing are a major problem and no doubt a drain on many due to skimming, scamming, and unethical practices. However, I do hope this niche medical group is adequately compensated for their much appreciated expertise. The service they provide these women is pretty incredible.

I hope none of your wives, daughters, or mothers ever have the need to frequent their facility; however, if by unfortunate circumstances they do, you will have a huge respect and appreciation for the awesome care this team provides.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
9376 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

Yeah that will be reduced to nothing

BCBS had approved several providers but she wanted the bougie place


Paying less for out of network centers and doctors isn’t reducing the patients benefits. Lower % paid along with higher deductibles and higher out of pocket maximums for out of network centers and doctors are what you usually sign up for. Some plans may not pay anything for out of network. The center gets 80% if its patients from out of state which adds another variable into this.
quote:

More than 80% of their patients come from outside the state.


Also they had 2 cases dismissed at federal level before going state route. It could have been for purely procedural reasons, but I don’t know anymore than following quote -
quote:

The state civil court jury deliberated for less than two hours Friday before rendering its unanimous verdict in the suit, the third attempt by the surgery center to seek payments after two earlier cases were dismissed in federal court.


Another view besides the plaintiff’s attorney
quote:

“If insurance companies were on the hook to pay whatever any provider charged, no provider would ever belong to a network and rates would be sky high.”

“If every provider says, I’m not going to join a network, I want my charges paid in full, you won’t have health insurance in the state of Louisiana anymore,”
This post was edited on 9/25/24 at 8:28 pm
Posted by Shamoan
Member since Feb 2019
12973 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:20 pm to
I worked at BCBSMS over a decade ago. Those people are straight-up evil.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
34837 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

I've done my research, and I was like, ‘I feel very confident that this is where I want to go,’” Arch told BCBS.


Hmmm. I was told doing your own research was the pastime of conspiracy theorists
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16344 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

I guess all of our premiums are probably going up even more now.

Yep, that’s how insurance works.
Posted by magicman534
The dirty dell
Member since May 2011
1794 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

Choosing these doctors and their facility didn’t have a mfn thing to do with wanting to go to a ‘bougie place’


I begged my mom to go there when she had breast cancer the second time in 2012 bc we personally worked with Dr. Trahan in residency. She said insurance wouldn’t cover it (she’s an LCMC employee). Instead, The surgeon that did her reconstruction at a NOLA hospital that was covered butchered her. Her wounds from graft Harvest sites on the back of her thighs dehisced (opened up) day 1. She had wound vacs for 6 weeks. Then when she finally healed she got septic from her port. I agree they are the best at what they do. Fwiw, the hack who operated on her is no longer there.
This post was edited on 9/25/24 at 8:35 pm
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
58432 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:27 pm to
When men get cancer they just cut your balls off and put you on the street
Posted by Wasp
Off Highland rd.
Member since Sep 2012
1532 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:34 pm to
The center never wanted to go “in-network”. They made more money being out of network. To go in network they would have had to negotiate a rate with very little bargaining power while their out of network rate is an average of what other providers get paid (Ochsner and LCMC have huge bargaining power). $421 million dollars is ludicrous by any account and anyone cheering it while also complaining about health insurance doesn’t understand how any of this works.
This post was edited on 9/25/24 at 8:35 pm
Posted by Dandaman
Louisiana
Member since May 2017
796 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:37 pm to
Amazing how a complex legal contract issue goes to 12 New Orleans jurors to decide hundreds of millions... I’m sure the jury understood everything real well.
Posted by Cryptococcus
Member since Apr 2024
32 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:39 pm to
Pretty sure these guys revolutionized reconstructive breast surgery with nipple sparing mascectomy. This is where you would bring any woman that you loved.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
9376 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

However, I do hope this niche medical group is adequately compensated for their much appreciated expertise. The service they provide these women is pretty incredible.


Doesn’t mean they don’t inflate prices billed to insurance companies or that patients don’t know that their insurance coverage for out of network would be much less and have to make up the difference. For a procedure or doctor visit I can go anywhere I want to go, but I know up front if I choose out of network I am responsible for anything not paid by insurance and know limits on out of network coverage versus in network. Besides a lower % of what’s considered a more typical rate the deductible is much higher and there is a higher out of pocket maximum (I have seen much worse out of network coverages than we currently have). The patients choose to make up the difference when they go out of network.

80% of patients coming from out of state with the center trying to negotiate with each state’s respective Blue Cross seems problematic from the start on getting patient and insurance on same page especially out of network which can differ from employer to employer and also state to state.

quote:

Williams also argued that the local Blue Cross engaged in “repricing” reimbursement rates the hospital had negotiated with Blue Cross companies from other states that insured the hospital’s out-of-state patients.

In court documents, Blue Cross argued that authorizing a treatment does not guarantee payment. Insurers do not have a set reimbursement rate that they pay out-of-network providers. Rather, they negotiate individual deals with brokers or employers.

The company also denied that it engaged in repricing, though it has agreements with out-of-state Blue Cross plans that it helps administer and that determine how much it will pay on a claim.

The company said that does not amount to fraud, and also noted in court documents that it successfully defended two similar suits brought by the hospital against it in federal court in the early 2010s.

https://www.nola.com/news/business/blue-cross-of-louisiana-shortchanged-new-orleans-surgical-center-by-421-million-jury-finds/article_6d58533e-79fc-11ef-82a9-af9fbab232b4.html
This post was edited on 9/25/24 at 11:09 pm
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
33276 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

I would like to see the calculations for this award that a jury did in 2 hours.


quote:

CDC doing CDC things
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
9376 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

Amazing how a complex legal contract issue goes to 12 New Orleans jurors to decide hundreds of millions... I’m sure the jury understood everything real well.


This reminded me of my wife getting put on the jury of a large dollar amount business dispute where both sides only spoke manderin which all had to be translated to jury and judge and so on. One side was Chinese based in states and the other was based in China. My wife always came home with a glazed look and ready to take a nap. They ended up settling after a week.



Posted by daydranking
nunya
Member since Sep 2019
487 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 9:25 pm to
Billable Hours undefeated
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram