- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Possible Red Dead Redemption PC release leaked by the Playstation Store
Posted on 8/13/24 at 7:42 am
Posted on 8/13/24 at 7:42 am
LINK
quote:
The original Red Dead Redemption appears to be coming to PC for the first time, more than 14 years after its original release.
That information comes from the PlayStation Store, where, at the time of writing, the game's description reads that players can "experience the epic western adventures that defined generation - now on PC for the first time ever." That description, which appeared overnight, is currently inaccurate, as Red Dead Redemption isn't available on PC.
The original game launched on PS3 and Xbox 360 back in May 2010, and it was followed up by a PS4 and Nintendo Switch "conversion" last year. That version wasn't really the PS5 remake that fans had been hoping for, but if there's now a PC version on the way, Rockstar could indirectly be giving the original Red Dead a boost. If this is just the PS4/Switch version, that's unlikely, but if a dedicated PC port is on the way, expectations are likely to be pretty high.
Posted on 8/13/24 at 8:12 am to sicboy
the only Red Dead game i've ever played....

Posted on 8/13/24 at 1:11 pm to sicboy
I actually preferred RDR1 to 2, and would be extreeemmmly tempted to buy this, but I am sure R* is gonna want $60 for a 14yo game. Can't do that on principle.
This post was edited on 8/13/24 at 2:46 pm
Posted on 8/13/24 at 2:44 pm to SaltyMcKracker
quote:
I actually preferred RDR1 to 2, and would be exteeemmmly tempted to buy this, but I am sure R* is gonna want $60 for a 14yo game. Can't do that on principle.
I might, just to provide proof of concept so they might bring Bloodborne
Posted on 8/13/24 at 3:21 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
just to provide proof of concept so they might bring Bloodborne
Posted on 8/14/24 at 5:49 am to sicboy
Certain studios have crossed a line for me. I will never spend another penny on R* or Ubisoft no matter what they release as they have not just been unable to “stay in their lane” but have given up on the pavement altogether and are lost in the woods.
Anything they produce revenue on, that revenue will be used against the providers of said revenue.
Anything they produce revenue on, that revenue will be used against the providers of said revenue.
Posted on 8/14/24 at 8:54 am to SaltyMcKracker
Rdr2 sucked
All you do is walk around in the camp because it takes like 2 hours to walk through every time
All you do is walk around in the camp because it takes like 2 hours to walk through every time
Posted on 8/14/24 at 9:06 am to el Gaucho
quote:I admire your commitment to your schtick.
el Gaucho
Posted on 8/14/24 at 9:08 am to Devious
It's hyperbole, but not by much.
Posted on 8/14/24 at 9:08 am to Devious
It’s not a schtick
Rdr2 sucks
Rdr2 sucks
Posted on 8/14/24 at 9:11 am to SaltyMcKracker
quote:
I actually preferred RDR1 to 2, and would be extreeemmmly tempted to buy this, but I am sure R* is gonna want $60 for a 14yo game. Can't do that on principle.
I agree with you on what is likely to come out.
But just imagine a real company who wanted to offer "value" - a DLC that allows you to bridge from RDR2 seamlessly into a remastered RDR with a pack of bridge missions that gives you an accelerated start for the RDR story mode.
THAT might be worth $60 as a package with the new, remastered RDR, wouldn't it?
Back to top
3








