- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Google loses massive antitrust case over its search dominance
Posted on 8/5/24 at 2:56 pm
Posted on 8/5/24 at 2:56 pm
quote:
WASHINGTON (AP) — A judge on Monday ruled that Google’s ubiquitous search engine has been illegally exploiting its dominance to squash competition and stifle innovation in a seismic decision that could shake up the internet and hobble one of the world’s best-known companies.
The highly anticipated decision issued by U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta comes nearly a year after the start of a trial pitting the U.S. Justice Department against Google in the country’s biggest antitrust showdown in a quarter century.
After reviewing reams of evidence that included testimony from top executives at Google, Microsoft and Apple during last year’s 10-week trial, Mehta issued his potentially market-shifting decision three months after the two sides presented their closing arguments in early May.
It represents a major setback for Google and its parent, Alphabet Inc., which had steadfastly argued that its popularity stemmed from consumers’ overwhelming desire to use a search engine so good at what it does that it has become synonymous with looking things up online. Google’s search engine currently processes an estimated 8.5 billion queries per day worldwide, nearly doubling its daily volume from 12 years ago, according to a recent study released by the investment firm BOND.
quote:
The case depicted Google as a technological bully that methodically has thwarted competition to protect a search engine that has become the centerpiece of a digital advertising machine that generated nearly $240 billion in revenue last year. Justice Department lawyers argued that Google’s monopoly enabled it to charge advertisers artificially high prices while also enjoying the luxury of having to invest more time and money into improving the quality of its search engine — a lax approach that hurt consumers.
LINK
Posted on 8/5/24 at 3:02 pm to RLDSC FAN
My first response to this is WHO BENEFITS? Google been helping the dims for a while now, which is what certain crooks want. They are all one big happy, deceptive family. Who benefits?
Posted on 8/5/24 at 3:03 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
while also enjoying the luxury of having to invest more time and money into improving the quality of its search engine — a lax approach that hurt consumers.
I feel like there should be a "not" in there.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 3:03 pm to RLDSC FAN
I’m all in favor of keeping monopolies in check but the Justice Department’s case sounds like poo poo.
“Artificially high advertising fees”? Based on what? They’re basically the only ad platform of this type and scale around so what are they comparing this to?
It’ll be interesting to see what happens on appeal.
“Artificially high advertising fees”? Based on what? They’re basically the only ad platform of this type and scale around so what are they comparing this to?
It’ll be interesting to see what happens on appeal.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 3:06 pm to RLDSC FAN
The funny thing is, Google's search engine is crap now. It was once the king, but it is so bloated trying to keep you on "their" pages.
Once you quit using google, it is hard to go back.
Once you quit using google, it is hard to go back.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 3:18 pm to Dadren
quote:
They’re basically the only ad platform of this type and scale around
mo·nop·o·ly
/m?'näp?le/
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 3:20 pm to DarthRebel
quote:
Once you quit using google, it is hard to go back.
whats some good alternatives?
Posted on 8/5/24 at 3:23 pm to GrizzlyAlloy
quote:
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.
How is google controlling or in possession of internet search when there are other competitors in the market and google isn’t preventing anyone from using them?
Big and successful <> monopoly.
This post was edited on 8/5/24 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 8/5/24 at 3:38 pm to Dadren
quote:
Once you quit using google, it is hard to go back.
So which one is the best to use now? Duck Duck Go?
Posted on 8/5/24 at 3:47 pm to CCT
quote:
My first response to this is WHO BENEFITS? Google been helping the dims for a while now, which is what certain crooks want. They are all one big happy, deceptive family. Who benefits?
You apparently look at everything through the lens of politics, which is sad.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 3:49 pm to Dadren
quote:
How is google controlling or in possession of internet search when there are other competitors in the market and google isn’t preventing anyone from using them?
The primary argument by the government seems to center around Google paying Apple and Samsung to make google search the default on their phones.
Apple is going to take a major blow if they lose those billions every year.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 3:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The primary argument by the government seems to center around Google paying Apple and Samsung to make google search the default on their phones.
OK that’s fair, I didn’t see that in the article the first time I read it but I see it now. I agree it’s a sketchy arrangement.
quote:
Apple is going to take a major blow if they lose those billions every year.
Yeah, I think it hurts both pretty bad tbh.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 4:13 pm to caro81
I still default to google for most things just for the convenience, but if you're ever searching for something somewhat controversial that you know exists or happened in the recent past but appears nowhere in the results, then Yandex is my go to. Every time I am looking for something google has memory-holed, Yandex has come through.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 4:32 pm to Dadren
quote:yeah, that's because it's nothing more than a shakedown by our goon government. if a monopoly is really a problem, break up the company. but no, they'll just fine them and status quo will continue.
I’m all in favor of keeping monopolies in check but the Justice Department’s case sounds like poo poo.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 4:33 pm to RLDSC FAN
Good, but it's probably too late for the 2024 election to have actual real search results display
Posted on 8/6/24 at 3:27 pm to caro81
quote:
whats some good alternatives?
DuckDuckGo, cannot go wrong. It was the search engine you got when you install Tor, might still be. That should say enough.
Posted on 8/6/24 at 6:39 pm to RLDSC FAN
Good. Just 15 years too late. Now overhaul the patent office.
Popular
Back to top
7










