Started By
Message
locked post

Can this go directly to the SC ?

Posted on 5/30/24 at 5:56 pm
Posted by Teauxler
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
3667 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 5:56 pm
I heard on the radio today there was a rare circumstance where it can.
Posted by Deuces
The bottom
Member since Nov 2011
16340 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 5:56 pm to
Mark levin screams so
Posted by Huskertiger2
Nebraska
Member since Oct 2020
1570 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 5:56 pm to
Yes. It probably won’t but there’s a chance
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
42817 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 5:57 pm to
I don’t see how it won’t.
Posted by Rev Bob Levy Sucks
Member since May 2024
101 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 5:57 pm to
There is no rare circumstance

The Supreme Court can just do it whenever they want to

They can take your speeding ticket case if they want to
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
17756 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 5:58 pm to
There is precedent.
Posted by Athis
I AM Charlie Kirk....
Member since Aug 2016
15756 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 5:58 pm to
It can but it has to go through the appeals first... They covered that on Fox earlier.. That's how I know..
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112606 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 5:58 pm to
Arguably, yes.

.0000000001% chance
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
42817 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

There is precedent.


Instead of using buzz words give exactly what precedent you speak of.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
35907 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 6:00 pm to
Levin is a smart guy, but in terms of navigating the legal system he really does not have a clue.
Posted by Bama Bird
Pittsburgh, PA
Member since Mar 2013
22660 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 6:01 pm to
In theory, SCOTUS can pretty much take any case at any time. They won't, though. If they wouldn't even hear TX v. PA, they most certainly won't take this one
Posted by Athis
I AM Charlie Kirk....
Member since Aug 2016
15756 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 6:02 pm to
Posted by Rev Bob Levy Sucks
Member since May 2024
101 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

n theory, SCOTUS can pretty much take any case at any time. They won't, though.



In theory DNC operatives in New York City wouldnt prosecute a presidential nominee for nothing with a paid off jury of political operatives with DNC media behind it.

But here we are

They can, and should take it

Posted by grizzlylongcut
Member since Sep 2021
14413 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

Levin is a smart guy, but in terms of navigating the legal system he really does not have a clue.


Excuse me?

Do you not know what his background is? I’d say he knows more about navigating the legal system than 99% of people.
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26360 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 6:05 pm to
They have to be petitioned before they could even consider it though.
Posted by Rev Bob Levy Sucks
Member since May 2024
101 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 6:06 pm to
quote:


They have to be petitioned before they could even consider it though.



Can be done with a fax in 5 minutes
Posted by Bama Bird
Pittsburgh, PA
Member since Mar 2013
22660 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

They can, and should take it


Strange, irrelevant argument but they won't. I've already said why they won't... the only theme that binds Conservatives together is this strange belief that the USA can actually be saved. They'd never take anything so political, and the same Con bench proved it 3 years ago.
Posted by kajuntiga
Sulphur
Member since Aug 2017
223 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 6:06 pm to
I heard said the Supreme Court could issue a Stay on sentencing until works thru appeal process ???????
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
19460 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

Levin is a smart guy, but in terms of navigating the legal system he really does not have a clue.
yes, because he is actually an attorney, lol. Try again.
Posted by nealnan8
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2016
3956 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 6:10 pm to
I would imagine that the SC would say that it must be appealed first, in the same jurisdiction of the original court. Not a lawyer, but just a guess..
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram