Started By
Message

re: WSJ suggests one of these 3 choices for Trump's VP

Posted on 5/13/24 at 12:46 pm to
Posted by Don Quixote
Member since May 2023
1683 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 12:46 pm to
WSJ has no fricking clue who Trump will pick and certainly not the final 3 - they're just selling views
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
49900 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

I'm not guessing but its got to be Sen.Vance from Ohio so trump is guaranteed Ohio's electoral votes.


If you think Trump has a chance of losing Ohio he has zero chance of getting to 270.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26957 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 12:57 pm to
Who did they suggest Biden should've gotten last time for unity purposes?

Oh? They didn't?

Because only one party is supposed to seek unity. Only one party is supposed to "reach across the aisle."
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
60736 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 12:57 pm to
I guess it doesn't matter that Trump said the only source to trust on matters like this was Trump.

Folks didn't learn when he directly shot down the Nimarata VP nonsense last week.
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
7172 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Glenn Youngkin


The best of the 3 by default
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56738 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Nikki Haley Glenn Youngkin Kim Reynolds




No fricking way
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51504 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 1:13 pm to
Youngkin has been pretty good in VA.
Posted by Deplorableinohio
Member since Dec 2018
5643 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 1:39 pm to
The foreign owned WSJ is a rag, that I continue to read after 43 years. I read the editorial this morning and just about threw up. The hawking for Haley is sickening. Countless number of voters crossed over to her in open primary states, a fact not acknowledged by the WSJ.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116328 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

Glenn Youngkin
Kim Reynolds


There's absolutely nothing wrong with Kim Reynolds at all.
Posted by Message Board User
Member since Dec 2006
6700 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

There's absolutely nothing wrong with Kim Reynolds at all.


Agreed and from an electoral standpoint she makes the most sense.

If the polls are to be believed, then Trump needs 1 of 3 states to win the WH again:

1) Pennsylvania
2) Michigan
3) Wisconsin

Win 1 of those 3 and the WH is his.

Reynolds is a highly popular governor from that area and would be especially helpful in the key suburbs of Michigan and PA.

Youngkin would be a good pick as well and would set the GOP up very nicely in 2028 but he probably doesn't help winning 2024, so a bit of a gamble.

Floating Nikki as a possible VP is just clickbait and nothing more.
This post was edited on 5/13/24 at 9:38 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram