Started By
Message

re: Wealthy white Louisiana residents win right to form their own city

Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:45 pm to
Posted by TrueLefty
St. Louis County
Member since Oct 2017
15084 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

St George was an unincorporated area that has never been part of Baton Rouge.

That is not what the article talked about. The problem is there will be less money for Baton Rouge. The article is all about the money from taxes going to St. George. There will be no more sharing the taxes with Baton Rouge.
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 8:50 pm
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164537 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

That is not what the article talked about.

I wonder why
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96704 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:46 pm to
The article misses the fricking point then because the money is for St George and BR is currently stealing it.

A poor area stealing from a less poor area doesn’t make it right. Because frankly that poor area is poor BECAUSE the people there are too fricking lazy and shiftless to better themselves.
Posted by thejudge
Westlake, LA
Member since Sep 2009
14098 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

There will be no more sharing the taxes with Baton Rouge.


Want much sharing as I understand.

More like taking and St. George getting nothing in return.
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
48998 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

There will be no more sharing the taxes with Baton Rouge.

BR was stealing much of the tax money from StG and funding services that didn't serve the areas they were taking the money from. It was slimy as hell. They are mad they'll lose the money they were stealing.
Posted by Pikes Peak Tiger
Colorado Springs
Member since Jun 2023
4121 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

That is not what the article talked about. The problem is there will be less money for Baton Rouge. That is what the article is about the money from taxes will be going to St. George. There will be no more sharing the taxes with Baton Rouge.


Explain why you think an unincorporated area that was not officially part of the city should be paying taxes to the city? Sounds a lot like taxation without representation doesn’t it?

I’m sure you won’t answer
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 8:49 pm
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21837 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

The problem is there will be less money for Baton Rouge.


And less responsibilities.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
33995 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

That is not what the article talked about. The problem is there will be less money for Baton Rouge. The article is all about the money from taxes going to St. George. There will be no more sharing the taxes with Baton Rouge.


On no, they're fixing a taxation without representation issue. The horror!
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19725 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

There will be no more sharing the taxes with Baton Rouge.
good
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram