- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:48 am to Indefatigable
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:48 am to Indefatigable
quote:
POTUS cannot be compelled by the Congress to appear or give testimony. The SOTU is a constitutional requirement that can be accomplished by sending congress a sticky note saying “all good” and doesn’t come from Congress anyway.
But apparently they can be charged and put in jail by any po dunk DA.
Lol. You tards should take a second and listen to yourselves.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:49 am to Robin Masters
quote:
But apparently they can be charged and put in jail by any po dunk DA.
"10th Amendment, bro"
-The Founding Fathers
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:50 am to Robin Masters
quote:
But apparently they can be charged and put in jail by any po dunk DA.
I didn’t say that. And again, the entire case will come down to official acts vs non-official acts.
I don’t know why you guys have latched on to this impeachment argument. Even trump’s legal team had the sense to toss it over the side like the nonsense that it is.
There are much, much better arguments for immunity.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News