- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:20 am to Indefatigable
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:20 am to Indefatigable
quote:
The executive’s immunity is in no way related to impeachment and removal.
The executive is not immune from congressional impeachment and removal...for anything congress deems impeachable, including acts in the criminal code.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:23 am to GumboPot
quote:
The executive is not immune from congressional impeachment and removal...for anything congress deems impeachable, including acts in the criminal code.
We’re discussing criminal immunity. The impeachment process has zero bearing whatsoever on the presidents criminal immunity for any act. Impeachment does not create or remove criminal immunity whatsoever.
They are totally separate things.
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 8:25 am
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:27 am to GumboPot
quote:
The executive is not immune from congressional impeachment and removal...for anything congress deems impeachable, including acts in the criminal code.
And impeachment has literally nothing to do with a criminal prosecution, even if the same acts form the basis of both
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News