Started By
Message

re: Bill requiring Louisiana public schools to display the Ten Commandments passes House

Posted on 4/11/24 at 11:22 am to
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164533 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 11:22 am to
quote:

or the founding fathers

“Separation of church and state” isn’t in the Constitution. Only that the US Congress can’t establish a national religion. The interpretation of the religion part of the 1st amendment has been completely bastardized.

“Separation of church and state” is the same kind of interpretation the left wants to use to get rid of the 2nd amendment. You can either follow the Constitution based on what’s in it or make up stuff to fit your agenda.
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 11:32 am
Posted by AubieinNC2009
Mountain NC
Member since Dec 2018
5031 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 11:33 am to
quote:

The interpretation of the religion part of the 1st amendment has been completely bastardized.



True but by putting the 10 commandments (a christian doctrine) up it would be preventing the free exercise of non-christian religions.

Also I dont want the state/schools teaching my kid anything about any religion
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
4364 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 10:28 am to
quote:

“Separation of church and state” isn’t in the Constitution. Only that the US Congress can’t establish a national religion. The interpretation of the religion part of the 1st amendment has been completely bastardized.

“Separation of church and state” is the same kind of interpretation the left wants to use to get rid of the 2nd amendment. You can either follow the Constitution based on what’s in it or make up stuff to fit your agenda.


O.k., but—and I'm glad you brought this up—there really IS a big parallel between the left's attempt to subvert the 2nd and your reading of the 1st.

If we go by only the reading of the literal words without regard for what the words actually meant to the people who wrote them (based on their other writings and historical context), then since there is no recognized official well-regulated militia, there is no right to bear arms.

We know from history that the people who wrote the 2nd meant the citizenry by "well-regulated militia." But that's not exactly what they wrote.

Likewise, we know from history that they did not want the government to endorse or establish an official religion for America, whether that be by a Congressional Act or by some other means. They did not and could not have envisioned the federally controlled public school system of 2024 when they wrote the constitution. In their minds the only way a state religion would be established would be by congressional legislation, so that's what they wrote. But it's clear from history that they would have opposed any other means of. facilitating that outcome as well.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram