- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The tone Jack Smith is taking with Cannon is no longer persuasion but outright threats
Posted on 4/3/24 at 6:48 pm
Posted on 4/3/24 at 6:48 pm
Posted on 4/3/24 at 6:55 pm to cajunangelle
So Trump had DOE clearance still and Trump disobeyed an Obama E.O. now?
What happened to nuke code possession?
Did Biden's memo not remove Trump's clearance?
What happened to nuke code possession?
Did Biden's memo not remove Trump's clearance?
Posted on 4/3/24 at 7:02 pm to Rebel
Reading Julie's page shows a wealth of information. My shitty screen shots that come out harder to read in dark mode don't do it justice.
Julie Kelly excellent Reporter
Julie Kelly excellent Reporter
Posted on 4/3/24 at 7:37 pm to udtiger
quote:
frick Smith
10 plus times.
What a lying, filthy POS.
Can lawyers only get away with lying?
They are exempt from law for some reason?
This post was edited on 4/3/24 at 7:41 pm
Posted on 4/3/24 at 8:00 pm to cajunangelle
Looking so forward to SFP to bring his infinite wisdom on this one. It should be entertaining
Posted on 4/3/24 at 8:20 pm to chili pup
quote:
Can lawyers only get away with lying?
Certain ones can. Think 4th letter in the alphabet.
Posted on 4/3/24 at 8:21 pm to udtiger
So........is this Smith panic?
Posted on 4/3/24 at 8:22 pm to ScottFowler
Cannon has him in a tough spot. He's not used to judges not rubber-stamping his bullshite.
This post was edited on 4/3/24 at 10:37 pm
Posted on 4/3/24 at 8:23 pm to cajunangelle
So what is the threat(s)?
Posted on 4/3/24 at 8:27 pm to udtiger
Really, it’s any government lawyer.
They can’t get fired, and they won’t prosecute themselves. So they just run around on their little power trips, and then react like this Jack Smith a-hole when somebody actually points out they’re wrong.
I’m cracking up at how all these leftists are thinking he’s such a badass speaking truth to power threatening to appeal if he loses the argument. Real lawyers appeal if they lose, and they have grounds. Jack Smith has nothing to lose if he appeals. It’s not like he has to post a half billion dollar bond.
In my next life I’m gonna work for the government. Deadline free. Stakes free. Malpractice insurance free. Immune from disbarment free. Immune from recusal motions. Immune from malicious prosecution. Just immune from the consequences of my decisions in general. Plus, I get to tell all the other lawyers that I’m only in it for truth and justice, when I don’t actually have a client AND brag about how busy I am all the time.
They can’t get fired, and they won’t prosecute themselves. So they just run around on their little power trips, and then react like this Jack Smith a-hole when somebody actually points out they’re wrong.
I’m cracking up at how all these leftists are thinking he’s such a badass speaking truth to power threatening to appeal if he loses the argument. Real lawyers appeal if they lose, and they have grounds. Jack Smith has nothing to lose if he appeals. It’s not like he has to post a half billion dollar bond.
In my next life I’m gonna work for the government. Deadline free. Stakes free. Malpractice insurance free. Immune from disbarment free. Immune from recusal motions. Immune from malicious prosecution. Just immune from the consequences of my decisions in general. Plus, I get to tell all the other lawyers that I’m only in it for truth and justice, when I don’t actually have a client AND brag about how busy I am all the time.
This post was edited on 4/3/24 at 8:28 pm
Posted on 4/3/24 at 8:29 pm to Wednesday
quote:
In my next life I’m gonna work for the government. Deadline free. Stakes free. Malpractice insurance free. Immune from disbarment free. Immune from recusal motions. Immune from malicious prosecution. Just immune from the consequences of my decisions in general. Plus, I get to tell all the other lawyers that I’m only in it for truth and justice, when I don’t actually have a client AND brag about how busy I am all the time.
Yea, but you won’t get paid for shite unless you’re willing to compromise your soul in the DC “social scene”.
Posted on 4/3/24 at 8:46 pm to Wednesday
When I watched MTG and Tucker I was wondering where Wednesday was.
I want to ask you if thry are holding Mike Johnson's kids as hostage? When they sent powder to his home did he get scared? Is he one of those sister wife religions that mother obeys him? But they ball gag each other like Pence and Mother and are really freaky?
Way over 20 years ago I said that I don't care who you are, Mother Teresa and Mother Angelica could go to DC and be bribed. Everyone has a price but Jesus in the desert with the devil.
So did Mike get Pelosi stock tips? A zillion dollars, gold and the keys to a mansion or two and an underground bunker? Was he ever not a democrat?
I want to ask you if thry are holding Mike Johnson's kids as hostage? When they sent powder to his home did he get scared? Is he one of those sister wife religions that mother obeys him? But they ball gag each other like Pence and Mother and are really freaky?
Way over 20 years ago I said that I don't care who you are, Mother Teresa and Mother Angelica could go to DC and be bribed. Everyone has a price but Jesus in the desert with the devil.
So did Mike get Pelosi stock tips? A zillion dollars, gold and the keys to a mansion or two and an underground bunker? Was he ever not a democrat?
This post was edited on 4/3/24 at 8:49 pm
Posted on 4/3/24 at 9:00 pm to cajunangelle
Not sure if this happens at some point prior to this BS case being appealed to SCOTUS, but it will happen there if not before - Smith was not/is not eligible to be appointed to the Special Prosecutor role as Garland, who appointed him, certainly knows - Smith is a low-rent, low-IQ, political stooge, willing to do whatever Garland orders - and make no mistake, Garland and his hate-America thugs are running this illegal farce.
Posted on 4/3/24 at 9:06 pm to cajunangelle
The Swamp has pictures of everyone in DC, including the gestapo agents that protect ice cream boy. Why hasn’t one whistleblower from the SS said anything. They see and hear and record everything.
Posted on 4/3/24 at 9:09 pm to Indefatigable
Here’s a section from an early part of the brief:
Seems like simple advocacy to me
quote:
That legal premise is wrong, and a jury instruction for Section 793 that reflects that premise would distort the trial. The PRA’s distinction between personal and presidential records has no bearing on whether a former President’s possession of documents containing national defense information is authorized under the Espionage Act, and the PRA should play no role in the jury instructions on the elements of Section 793. See ECF No. 373 at 5-12. Indeed, based on the current record, the PRA should not play any role at trial at all.
Moreover, it is vitally important that the Court promptly decide whether the unstated legal premise underlying the recent order does, in the Court’s view, represent “a correct formulation of the law.” ECF No. 407 at 2. If the Court wrongly concludes that it does, and that it intends to include the PRA in the jury instructions regarding what is authorized under Section 793, it must inform the parties of that decision well in advance of trial. The Government must have the opportunity to consider appellate review well before jeopardy attaches. See, e.g., United States v. Wexler, 31 F.3d 117, 129 (3d Cir. 1994) (“[T]he adoption of a clearly erroneous jury instruction that entails a high probability of failure of a prosecution—a failure the government could not then seek to remedy by appeal or otherwise—constitutes the kind of extraordinary situation in which we are empowered to issue the writ of mandamus.”); In re United States, 397 F.3d 274, 283 (5th Cir. 2005) (courts “have permitted the Government to obtain writs of mandamus when a proposed criminal jury instruction clearly violated the law, risked prejudicing the Government at trial with jeopardy attached, and provided the Government no other avenue of appeal”); United States v. Pabon-Cruz, 391 F.3d 86, 91-92 (2d Cir. 2004) (similar).
Seems like simple advocacy to me
Posted on 4/3/24 at 9:10 pm to boosiebadazz
Yea if that’s all that’s underlying this narrative, it’s a nothing burger.
Posted on 4/3/24 at 9:21 pm to Indefatigable
No reasonable prosecutor
Too old and addled to prosecute
(D)ifferent
Too old and addled to prosecute
(D)ifferent
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News