- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/2/24 at 5:18 pm to burger bearcat
I'll say it once more...
Civilized societies don't send their women to die in combat. That's a man's job. (Yes, to die if necessary.)
Civilized societies don't send their women to die in combat. That's a man's job. (Yes, to die if necessary.)
Posted on 4/2/24 at 5:20 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
The 19th Amendment should have made draft and combat eligibility as a condition of voting.
Having skin in the game as a condition for having a say (vote) in matters applies to paying taxes and fighting wars. And yet neither are...which is why we're in the situation we're in.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 5:26 pm to burger bearcat
I’d rather fight with a woman beside me than one of those trannie freaks.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 5:30 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
We're living in a time in which basic, easily observable realities are being disbelieved because of propaganda.
The more worrisome issue is that the people implementing it know the reality. Yes, lot of people don't, and I just had a discussion with one here, but the military knows, and I suspect the civilian "leadership" making the decisions knows. "Fundamental transformation" is more important than effectiveness and efficiency. They don't care if it costs lives or money.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 5:36 pm to burger bearcat
The only way I'd support excluding women from combat is if we also exclude them from representing me or voting. If they have a say in me fighting in a war, they can too.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 5:51 pm to Longhorn Actual
quote:
I'll say it once more...
Civilized societies don't send their women to die in combat. That's a man's job. (Yes, to die if necessary.)
Nope, that ship has sailed.
Modern Western women have decided they are equal to men in every way.
Further, their idiotic voting patterns are electing people that are more likely to weaken the country and increase the likelihood of War.
They do not deserve the same protections that previous generations of women have been afforded.
If they want equality, that means equality of responsibility as well.
Maybe seeing a few thousand of their sisters arriving home in body-bags will wake them to the realities of the world.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 5:51 pm to wackatimesthree
They tried to do this in the early 90s, but the Senate and the services stopped it.
I think it’s part of a broader effort to corrupt and break our culture. And it’s occurring for that reason alone. If you look at their agenda, they want to smash healthy gender roles, crater the birth rate, and create conflict between the genders, while making a mockery of our faith and traditions. While simultaneously importing tens of millions of foreign people.
It’s all one thing, and it’s all connected.
Senate hearings on women in combat, CSPAN 1991.
LINK
I think it’s part of a broader effort to corrupt and break our culture. And it’s occurring for that reason alone. If you look at their agenda, they want to smash healthy gender roles, crater the birth rate, and create conflict between the genders, while making a mockery of our faith and traditions. While simultaneously importing tens of millions of foreign people.
It’s all one thing, and it’s all connected.
Senate hearings on women in combat, CSPAN 1991.
LINK
This post was edited on 4/2/24 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 4/2/24 at 9:29 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
Civilized societies don't send their women to die in combat. That's a man's job. (Yes, to die if necessary.)
quote:
Nope, that ship has sailed.
Modern Western women have decided they are equal to men in every way.
Further, their idiotic voting patterns are electing people that are more likely to weaken the country and increase the likelihood of War.
They do not deserve the same protections that previous generations of women have been afforded.
If they want equality, that means equality of responsibility as well.
Maybe seeing a few thousand of their sisters arriving home in body-bags will wake them to the realities of the world.
Everything you said is true.
Nothing you said refutes what I said.
It does, however, point to how far we've gone astray.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 9:34 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
Why the push for women in combat?
= HUMILIATION of America
Posted on 4/2/24 at 9:50 pm to burger bearcat
Weak arms.
Weak army.
This post was edited on 4/4/24 at 5:11 pm
Posted on 4/2/24 at 10:04 pm to burger bearcat
The top echelons of the military are drawn primarily from combat arms. So to get more 4 star ladies they need them in those parts of the military
Posted on 4/2/24 at 10:13 pm to burger bearcat
Women are told by radical feminists that being wives and mothers is not good enough.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 10:28 pm to Flats
quote:
The more worrisome issue is that the people implementing it know the reality. Yes, lot of people don't, and I just had a discussion with one here, but the military knows, and I suspect the civilian "leadership" making the decisions knows. "Fundamental transformation" is more important than effectiveness and efficiency. They don't care if it costs lives or money.
Absolutely.
And while I agree that it might be more worrisome (or maybe not, more later), it's still less surprising. At least to me.
Those who have philosophically bought into the left's agenda have pretty much always disregarded the consequences of advancing it even when those consequences were abundantly clear from the outset.
The current administration's energy policies are a great example. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that all of these "initiatives" designed to punish, reduce, or eliminate fossil fuel use are going to continue to drive up inflation and simply shift the burden of energy production in such a way as to collapse the system. We had someone recently post an article that estimated that within a surprisingly short number of years, electricity demand will double due to the aforementioned initiatives and the power grid in most places won't be able to keep up.
I refuse to believe that whoever is actually pulling Biden's Alzheimer's addled strings can't figure out tat the more electric cars, stoves, etc., etc people use, the more electricity they will need. They just don't care. It will be someone else's problem by then.
They did this with health care "reform," with changing policies in the military, etc, etc, etc.
They always do it.
The reason I say it may be more worrisome, but it may not be, is that—at least—if the general population can still say, "The Emperor is Wearing No Clothes" when necessary, the suicidal actions of the committed left can be checked.
But if the general public goes blind and can't tell whether that Emperor is wearing anything or not, then we're in huge trouble. And I think that's what's happened. And it's about to get worse with AI.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 10:33 pm to Jspaspa3303
quote:
minstrel cycles
Why
Posted on 4/2/24 at 10:42 pm to burger bearcat
Israel does it. Mandatory for all citizens.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 10:47 pm to Craig86
quote:
Israel does it. Mandatory for all citizens.
No, they don't use women in combat roles.
The Caracal Battalion exists, but it's a ceremonial unit, and they keep it far from any real danger.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 11:45 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
it far from any real danger
So, explain the IDF women that were killed, kidnapped and raped on Oct 7.
They've never been out of danger. They're guards at stabby gate, the Muslim quarter, etc.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 11:54 pm to burger bearcat
In the Army the reason stated is equal promotion opportunities. The king maker jobs are almost all combat arms so women being unable to serve in infantry, armor, artillery limited their promotion potential.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News