- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/2/24 at 1:19 pm to moneyg
quote:
Hypothetically, what does it mean if no signature verification was done.
Can be shown a mountain of evidence and will reply....yeah but where is the evidence. DEG has blinders on and has no intentions of taking them off.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 1:27 pm to moneyg
Hypothetically, what does it mean if no signature verification was done.
No signature validation is a lofty charge. If this were proven to have been the case, it would have serious consequences.
In order for a mail in vote to be considered valid, the voter has to sign the ballot. I could be wrong, but I believe they also have to date and sign the envelope. Those signatures must match AND match the signature in the voting book.
The idea is that having all three match verifies three things:
1. The person mailing the vote is the same as the person casting it
2. The person casting the vote is the registered voter
3. The vote is being mailed before the deadline.
If no signature verification was done, then none of these three elements can be proven. It has already been admitted that many mail in votes were counted without envelopes, without dated envelopes (meaning they weren’t mailed) or with late dates (meaning they could have been manufactured post-election). No signature verification means that there is no way to check if these votes were even made by a person at all. One would want there to be no signature verification if they were going to duplicate ballots en-masse after polls closed to make up a deficit to flip an election. They have already admitted that contrary to law, all ballot images have been destroyed, meaning signature verification after the fact is impossible.
Basically, without signature verification, there is no way to distinguish fake ballots from real ones, let alone discover mail-in ballots meant to impersonate registered voters that were not actually cast by those people. Without signature verification, Georgia’s election never should have been certified.
No signature validation is a lofty charge. If this were proven to have been the case, it would have serious consequences.
In order for a mail in vote to be considered valid, the voter has to sign the ballot. I could be wrong, but I believe they also have to date and sign the envelope. Those signatures must match AND match the signature in the voting book.
The idea is that having all three match verifies three things:
1. The person mailing the vote is the same as the person casting it
2. The person casting the vote is the registered voter
3. The vote is being mailed before the deadline.
If no signature verification was done, then none of these three elements can be proven. It has already been admitted that many mail in votes were counted without envelopes, without dated envelopes (meaning they weren’t mailed) or with late dates (meaning they could have been manufactured post-election). No signature verification means that there is no way to check if these votes were even made by a person at all. One would want there to be no signature verification if they were going to duplicate ballots en-masse after polls closed to make up a deficit to flip an election. They have already admitted that contrary to law, all ballot images have been destroyed, meaning signature verification after the fact is impossible.
Basically, without signature verification, there is no way to distinguish fake ballots from real ones, let alone discover mail-in ballots meant to impersonate registered voters that were not actually cast by those people. Without signature verification, Georgia’s election never should have been certified.
This post was edited on 4/2/24 at 1:33 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News