Biden cracks down on diesel trucks in bid to fight climate change, reduce emissions

Inflation fixing to eat.

The truck manufacturers still do not have their DEF systems working properly...

More rules brought to you by people that have never done a damn thing in their life...

and government vehicles will be promptly exempted.

this is so fricking infuriating.

Dear Biden:

This couldn’t possibly blow up in their faces…

Zaidi is a native paki lawyer.
What he knows about emissions, economics and business is zilch.
This policy is to cause inflation, destroy the economy and undermine the US.

I'll roll it all back. Committed to that long ago.

quote:

---

forcing a larger number of trucks and buses to be zero-emissions in that time frame.

---

This will actually succeed in the "zero emissions" department as it will pull a bunch of trucks off the highway and do nothing but hurt Americans.

This seems like stopping too short though. why don't they make car manufacturers sell all cars for 200 bucks and get 9000 miles to the gallon?

quote:

---

White House Climate Advisor Ali Zaidi. "By tackling pollution from heavy-duty vehicles, we can unlock extraordinary public health, climate, and economic gains."

---

How does this policy lead to economic gains? That’s absurd. Actually all of it is, but economic gains?

Yuge case was argued before the SCOTUS back in January of this year.

The so-called 'Chevron Doctrine' have been used for decades by unelected, unaccountable, useless bureaucrats to cripple our country.

If the SCOTUS overturns Chevron, it would be a tremendous boost to bringing in an over-bearing federal bureaucracy.

The so-called 'Chevron Doctrine' has been twisted by the left to give all these alphabet agencies tremendous power over the US and our economy.

Many of these clowns who are making tremendous decisions are unelected and unaccountable useless corrupt-crats.

quote:

---

It has been nearly 40 years since the Supreme Court indicated in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council that courts should defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute. After more than three-and-a-half hours of oral argument on Wednesday, it seemed unlikely that the rule outlined in that case, known as the Chevron doctrine, will survive in its current form. A majority of the justices seemed ready to jettison the doctrine or at the very least significantly limit it.

The court’s ruling could have ripple effects across the federal government, where agencies frequently use highly trained experts to interpret and implement federal laws. Although the doctrine was relatively noncontroversial when it was first introduced in 1984, in recent years conservatives – including some members of the Supreme Court – have called for it to be overruled.

---

LINK