- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: During Total Meltdown on MSNBC Over SCOTUS and Trump Immunity, Inconvenient Detail Emerges
Posted on 2/29/24 at 10:05 am to WPBTiger
Posted on 2/29/24 at 10:05 am to WPBTiger
quote:
It was Special Counsel Jack Smith who asked SCOTUS to take up the issue.
Yea, months ago and they declined. Then it went to the appeals court and, naturally, they ruled no one has broad immunity.
Now the SCOTUS is just like sike we'll take it after all.
No doubt Dems wanted this pre-election for political reasons, but it's pretty clear the conservative justices are playing their own political game too. I don't see how the timeline can put that in question at all. Their version of "quick" is another 4 month delay after the first 3 month one.
4
Posted on 2/29/24 at 10:07 am to SpyBoy
quote:
but it's pretty clear the conservative justices are playing their own political game too
Thomas et all are sick of the political bullshite.
They’d rather it stop but had made it clear that if it continued, they would have to address it.
Posted on 2/29/24 at 10:13 am to SpyBoy
quote:
Yea, months ago and they declined. Then it went to the appeals court and, naturally, they ruled no one has broad immunity. Now the SCOTUS is just like sike we'll take it after all.
You mean it followed the normal procedure of going to a lower appeals court before moving up to the Supreme Court?
Following normal procedure, the horror!!!
Posted on 2/29/24 at 10:46 am to SpyBoy
quote:
Now the SCOTUS is just like sike we'll take it after all. No doubt Dems wanted this pre-election for political reasons, but it's pretty clear the conservative justices are playing their own political game too. I don't see how the timeline can put that in question at all. Their version of "quick" is another 4 month delay after the first 3 month one.
SCOTUS denying to hear a case until it’s worked its way entirely through the lower courts is completely standard practice.
Posted on 2/29/24 at 1:17 pm to SpyBoy
Dems and Lib Pundits wanted to F around lately and go after Clarence Thomas... Now they gone learn.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News