- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Suburban owners- do you like it?
Posted on 2/19/24 at 2:16 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
Posted on 2/19/24 at 2:16 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
No. Per a buddy who just bought his wife one.
Your buddy is misinformed.
Here's a pic of the chassis. It's a full frame vehicle.
The gold colored parts are highlighting the air ride components.
Posted on 2/19/24 at 3:40 am to Billy Blanks
Wagoneer L has my interest and my only hesitation is the new I6 turbo. It would be a no brainer for me if they still offered the V8. More interior room than the other large SUVs.
Posted on 2/19/24 at 3:52 am to Billy Blanks
I bought one new last year. I love it. I have always driven Tahoes until now. That extra couple of feet is so useful. Especially with kids.
Posted on 2/19/24 at 4:07 am to Billy Blanks
We have the GMC version with the gas V8. Honestly wish we’d have bought one sooner. It’s an excellent vehicle for us with plenty of power. It’s massive but for such a big vehicle, it’s surprisingly easy to park. They come with an LSD so it can handle a boat ramp or light off roading pretty easily. Some have air suspension but ours does not.
We’ll eventually replace our Toyota 4Runner with another Yukon or Suburban with the turbodiesel. I prefer the styling and the pricing/packaging structure of the Suburban to the Yukon.
There is a reason General Motors has 60%+ market share in full sized SUVs. That’s been clear to us since we bought one.
We’ll eventually replace our Toyota 4Runner with another Yukon or Suburban with the turbodiesel. I prefer the styling and the pricing/packaging structure of the Suburban to the Yukon.
There is a reason General Motors has 60%+ market share in full sized SUVs. That’s been clear to us since we bought one.
This post was edited on 2/19/24 at 4:15 am
Posted on 2/19/24 at 6:24 am to BuckyCheese
Sweet!
I wish they'd bring back the 3/4 ton versions. I'd buy one of those.
I wish they'd bring back the 3/4 ton versions. I'd buy one of those.
Posted on 2/19/24 at 8:19 am to weptiger
quote:
~150K miles. Had to put in a new transmission
quote:
Been a fantastic vehicle.
If the trans failed at 150k or less with proper maintenance, then you and I have very different ideas about what constitutes a "fantastic vehicle."
This post was edited on 2/19/24 at 8:25 am
Posted on 2/19/24 at 8:25 am to Billy Blanks
Suburban is an excellent choice. It's expensive though, especially if you want the air suspension, adaptive cruise control, and the most powerful engine.
We recently bought a full sized GM SUV and considered the Sequoia, Wagoneer, and Expedition.
Here's how I'd grade them based on the 2023 models:
Suburban/Yukon/Tahoe: A+ These are venerable nameplates that are popular for a reason. General Motors dominates this market and they invest a lot into these trucks. Even the shorter wheelbase Tahoe and Yukon are extremely roomy - moreso than the standard length expedition if you put a lot of taller people in the 3rd row. They have a very nice off road model with air suspension. The manetorological shocks they've been using for 25 years now are available in the higher end models and they are worth it - they make these things ride super well. The 6.2L V8 and 5.3L V8 sound the same and they can both tow very well, but the 6.2L model is legitimately fast. The 3.0L diesel is an excellent option if you put a lot of miles on them (a lot of Suburban owners go for the diesel). The Yukon is tied with the Sequoia as having the best resale in this class, and the Suburban is pretty close to it.
Jeep Wagoneer: B The Jeep has a very well designed interior combined with very smooth riding suspension and the proven Ram 1500 chassis. It rides as well as the Suburban, but I think the Suburban might handle slightly better. The Jeep we drove was a 5.7L V8 model, which is not in production anymore but they still exist in inventory if you want to buy one. Problem here is that the Wagoneer isn't selling very well, and Jeep is offering a lot of cash on the hood. I think people are reluctant to spend this kind of money on a Jeep (even though it's a Ram underneath), and I think they are even less excited about doing so when the only option is an unproven 3.0L six cylinder turbo engine. Resale value and long term reliability are both big question marks here.
Ford Expedition: C The Ford is a solid option if you can get it on sale. Otherwise I wouldn't bother. The best thing about it is the powertrain. The high output turbo 3.5L V6 is actually powerful and the Expedition models with that particular engine are pretty quick. Ford's big issue here is the interior design and the ride quality. The space utilization isn't as good as the Wagoneer or Tahoe/Yukon especially in the third row. They make a longer version though that probably solves most of those issues and helps it compete with the Suburban and Yukon XL. The ride is pretty choppy compared with the other models. Resale isn't as good as the Toyota or the GM models, but I'm sure it's better than the Wagoneer. I don't really understand the appeal unless you are a Ford guy and refuse to consider better options.
Toyota Sequioa - D - At the time, this was the most difficult one for us to find and test drive. There are plenty of them available in inventory now though. We are big Toyota fans, but this one was a huge disappointment and a rare miss for the company. The biggest issue is that just isn't enough space in this truck to compete with the Tahoe or Expedition - much less the Suburban, Yukon XL, or Wagoneer. The third row is the most cramped, and there is the least amount of cargo space. The interior quality is not bad, but the competitors are all as good or better. The inside felt like it was designed to compete with the aging Ford Expedition, but with less interior space - except that the Ford is about to be redesigned completely while the Toyota's is brand new. It's miles behind the Jeep and GM products in ride quality, but a little better than the Expedition. The powertrain is excellent though. I wouldn't be concerned at all with the V6 hybrid powertrain, especially with this kind of power. I'm sure it can tow as well as the others without breaking a sweat.
As far as reliability - I've read about issues with all of them. With the exception of the Wagoneer, I wouldn't really be concerned owning any of them long term. I think the Toyota turbo waste gate issues, GM's lifter ticks, and Ford's transmission and cam phaser problems are all overblown and amplified by social media. I'd probably be most confident owning the Toyota and General Motors trucks long term. Ford is kind of a risk for me, but it's an old design and most of the quirks have probably been addressed. The Wagoneer I think is probably the biggest question mark.
Even on their worst days - all of them are probably far superior to anything you can get from Land Rover, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, or Genesis. But none of them are going to be a 1980s Land Cruiser that can just run forever.
We recently bought a full sized GM SUV and considered the Sequoia, Wagoneer, and Expedition.
Here's how I'd grade them based on the 2023 models:
Suburban/Yukon/Tahoe: A+ These are venerable nameplates that are popular for a reason. General Motors dominates this market and they invest a lot into these trucks. Even the shorter wheelbase Tahoe and Yukon are extremely roomy - moreso than the standard length expedition if you put a lot of taller people in the 3rd row. They have a very nice off road model with air suspension. The manetorological shocks they've been using for 25 years now are available in the higher end models and they are worth it - they make these things ride super well. The 6.2L V8 and 5.3L V8 sound the same and they can both tow very well, but the 6.2L model is legitimately fast. The 3.0L diesel is an excellent option if you put a lot of miles on them (a lot of Suburban owners go for the diesel). The Yukon is tied with the Sequoia as having the best resale in this class, and the Suburban is pretty close to it.
Jeep Wagoneer: B The Jeep has a very well designed interior combined with very smooth riding suspension and the proven Ram 1500 chassis. It rides as well as the Suburban, but I think the Suburban might handle slightly better. The Jeep we drove was a 5.7L V8 model, which is not in production anymore but they still exist in inventory if you want to buy one. Problem here is that the Wagoneer isn't selling very well, and Jeep is offering a lot of cash on the hood. I think people are reluctant to spend this kind of money on a Jeep (even though it's a Ram underneath), and I think they are even less excited about doing so when the only option is an unproven 3.0L six cylinder turbo engine. Resale value and long term reliability are both big question marks here.
Ford Expedition: C The Ford is a solid option if you can get it on sale. Otherwise I wouldn't bother. The best thing about it is the powertrain. The high output turbo 3.5L V6 is actually powerful and the Expedition models with that particular engine are pretty quick. Ford's big issue here is the interior design and the ride quality. The space utilization isn't as good as the Wagoneer or Tahoe/Yukon especially in the third row. They make a longer version though that probably solves most of those issues and helps it compete with the Suburban and Yukon XL. The ride is pretty choppy compared with the other models. Resale isn't as good as the Toyota or the GM models, but I'm sure it's better than the Wagoneer. I don't really understand the appeal unless you are a Ford guy and refuse to consider better options.
Toyota Sequioa - D - At the time, this was the most difficult one for us to find and test drive. There are plenty of them available in inventory now though. We are big Toyota fans, but this one was a huge disappointment and a rare miss for the company. The biggest issue is that just isn't enough space in this truck to compete with the Tahoe or Expedition - much less the Suburban, Yukon XL, or Wagoneer. The third row is the most cramped, and there is the least amount of cargo space. The interior quality is not bad, but the competitors are all as good or better. The inside felt like it was designed to compete with the aging Ford Expedition, but with less interior space - except that the Ford is about to be redesigned completely while the Toyota's is brand new. It's miles behind the Jeep and GM products in ride quality, but a little better than the Expedition. The powertrain is excellent though. I wouldn't be concerned at all with the V6 hybrid powertrain, especially with this kind of power. I'm sure it can tow as well as the others without breaking a sweat.
As far as reliability - I've read about issues with all of them. With the exception of the Wagoneer, I wouldn't really be concerned owning any of them long term. I think the Toyota turbo waste gate issues, GM's lifter ticks, and Ford's transmission and cam phaser problems are all overblown and amplified by social media. I'd probably be most confident owning the Toyota and General Motors trucks long term. Ford is kind of a risk for me, but it's an old design and most of the quirks have probably been addressed. The Wagoneer I think is probably the biggest question mark.
Even on their worst days - all of them are probably far superior to anything you can get from Land Rover, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, or Genesis. But none of them are going to be a 1980s Land Cruiser that can just run forever.
Posted on 2/19/24 at 8:33 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
I wish they'd bring back the 3/4 ton versions. I'd buy one of those.
They are testing them now with the 6.6L gas V8 and the Duramax Diesel. I don't think production starts until later this year though.
I suspect they will focus on maximizing payload since their biggest customer will be American, Canadian, and European militaries - many of which will upfit them with armored panels and bulletproof glass and send them off to embassies in shitty parts of the world. So the ride will probably suck compared to the half ton models. I also wouldn't expect there to be more than just a couple of trim levels.
At a glance it looks like every other suburban you'd see on the highway. But a careful eye could see the thicker glass and 8 lug wheels - likely the only way to really tell if it's armored or not from the outside.
This post was edited on 2/19/24 at 8:35 am
Posted on 2/19/24 at 9:14 am to greenbean
quote:
sequoia 2022 or earlier.
Lol
I have friends that buy sequoias and I buy suburbans
They have more trouble with theirs on multiple vehincles plus the suburban has more room/better technology/rides better/ and gets way better gas mileage
The friends mentioned above are getting a new vehicle soon and are looking hard at options to get a way from sequoias
Posted on 2/19/24 at 9:16 am to goofball
We have a 22 z71 suburban. It has been great for us so far, had a Tahoe before that but it just didn't have enough room for 3 kids.
Posted on 2/19/24 at 9:19 am to goofball
I'd be interested in the most bare bones trim anyway. Every luxury I want in a vehicle is standard equipment in work trucks now.
Posted on 2/19/24 at 9:19 am to Midtiger farm
I wanted the new Sequoia to be a contender for us and it was just such a miss. I sing Toyota praises and we've traditionally been a Toyota/Lexus family, so I'm not dogging it for sport.
Posted on 2/19/24 at 9:21 am to Midtiger farm
quote:
I have friends that buy sequoias and I buy suburbans
They have more trouble with theirs on multiple vehincles plus the suburban has more room/better technology/rides better/ and gets way better gas mileage
Even the previous gen Sequioa is probably the most problematic vehicle Toyota builds. I wouldn't call them bad at all, and I love the 5.7L V8 powertrain - THAT is a bulletproof, albeit thirsty engine. Probably one of the best gas motors you can get in a half ton truck/SUV.
Wish Toyota just added an updated dashboard and car play to the previous generation instead of making the new Sequoia.
Posted on 2/19/24 at 9:25 am to NoBoDawg
quote:
consider one of those passenger Mercedes Sprinter vans.
once you add all the bells and whistles they are the same price with less cargo space unless you get it custom altered after you buy it
Also they are not the most reliable either and the parts are way more expensive
Posted on 2/19/24 at 9:27 am to Billy Blanks
Short and sweet version of my experience with Chevys.
Positive. They run. Take care of basic ware items and it would go. I never had and transmission related issues. Put key in/ push button and it would fire up.
Negatives. Cheap arse interior, HVAC etc. each one of the AC’s eventually shite the bed. S10 after 3 years, the full sizes shortly after that. The plastic interior bits will start to fall apart after 4-5 years. I’m talking sun visors, seat bases etc. . Pretty sure the Louisiana summer heat doesn’t help but this has never been an issue in my Toyota.
Positive. They run. Take care of basic ware items and it would go. I never had and transmission related issues. Put key in/ push button and it would fire up.
Negatives. Cheap arse interior, HVAC etc. each one of the AC’s eventually shite the bed. S10 after 3 years, the full sizes shortly after that. The plastic interior bits will start to fall apart after 4-5 years. I’m talking sun visors, seat bases etc. . Pretty sure the Louisiana summer heat doesn’t help but this has never been an issue in my Toyota.
Posted on 2/19/24 at 9:42 am to Zakatak
quote:
Wagoneer L has my interest and my only hesitation is the new I6 turbo.
OMG…don’t do it. Get a GM product before Jeep like this….unless you’re leasing, then who cares.
Posted on 2/19/24 at 9:43 am to Billy Blanks
Wife (no pics) drives a 2016 Suburban. 150,000 miles and going.
Posted on 2/19/24 at 9:45 am to Pettifogger
quote:
wanted the new Sequoia to be a contender for us and it was just such a miss
How is it a “miss”? Unless you need a Suburban, the Sequoia’s I’ve seen have been a huge upgrade over previous gen. They look fantastic as well & not a mommy mobile herd vehicle like you see at school pickup line.
As far as engine issues, yes there was definitely teething issues with engine at first, but I’ve read where that’s been taken care of. Don’t buy first model year of anything. As far as longevity, it’s Toyota & not even close.
This post was edited on 2/19/24 at 9:51 am
Posted on 2/19/24 at 9:48 am to Billy Blanks
For some reason they refuse to stay in alignment (probably a Louisiana issue not a Suburban issue)...besides that great safe ride for my family.
This post was edited on 2/19/24 at 9:49 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News