- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: No prison time for woman convicted in cannabis-induced killing
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:06 am to Diseasefreeforall
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:06 am to Diseasefreeforall
White women have always and will always have the easiest lives on the planet.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:15 am to Diseasefreeforall
Pics of crazy white woman and her victim.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:35 am to Zzyzx
quote:
I don’t understand this part
Under California criminal law, people are responsible for their actions when impaired by alcohol or drugs unless their intoxication was involuntary.
The article implying she got high against her will? He hotbox her in a car or something? She said she was smoking.
This is a wild sentencing
quote:
Spejcher testified that she asked him for a hit from the bong. He prepared it for her and she inhaled. All she felt, she told the court, was 'burning and coughing'.
Some 15 minutes later, when the effects had failed to kick in, O'Melia added more cannabis to the device, generating more smoke, and, according to Spejcher said: 'something like, let's make this more intense for you...or more f**ked up'.
In her testimony, Spejcher claimed that she did not want to smoke more but felt pressured.
'He got up from his chair and turned the bong toward my face, rushed it to my face and was pressuring me, "Hurry up, hurry up, you’ve got to inhale," she said, according to the testimony reported by the Ventura County Star.
'It all happened so fast. I felt like I couldn’t say no, and I inhaled out of the bong.'
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:48 am to Diseasefreeforall
So you’re saying that roided up dude with the thick neck was scared of the pencil neck nerd? Checks out.
Big Mike is posting again.
Big Mike is posting again.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:53 am to glassart
Anything after 100 is just excessive.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 2:44 am to glassart
This is some crazy shite. RIP to lil homie who just wanted to smoke with his chick
Posted on 1/24/24 at 2:52 am to Epaminondas
quote:
How does smoking weed cause a person to completely lose their mind and go on a murderous rampage?
There is a not quite novel but new area of study into marijuana psychosis as a defense in states that have laws conducive to the defense. I have no idea if this is junk science born of possible fear-mongering or not. I will say I wouldn't be surprised that there is not a very small portion of the population that reacts badly to some doses of d-9-THC or other psychoactive chemicals in pot. I also would not be surprised that this is just being seen now due to the levels of THC seen in some modern post-strains.
I would say that she stabbed herself in the neck and then required tasing and batoning in order to take her into custody. This still leaves the issue of meeting the involuntary standard CA requires. While it is known that people can become intoxicated on various drugs involuntarily without hearing the testimony first hand I am quite dubious but do accept being bullied into dangerous amounts of alcohol is a not unheard of situation.
I am curious about the jury makeup because without doing a mock trial or deep dive I would expect the defense would want mid to old Boomers through Silent Generation jurors who are much more likely to buy a reefer madness defense.
In the end, I think there is more to the story than what appears on the face but I am very cautious of applying the defense. It is similar to the early days of the "insanity defense". This defense has the added "benefit" of not being confined in a mental institution.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 3:23 am to Obtuse1
This is wild. I certainly feel for the victims family. I mean, she admitted to voluntarily using initially. Then later says she might have felt pressured into doing more? Lol, what a crock of shite and well obviously never hear the victims side of the story.
She absolutely deserved serious jail time.
She absolutely deserved serious jail time.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 3:49 am to Train is comin
quote:I wholeheartedly agree.
She absolutely deserved serious jail time.
So called justice system is bullshite.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 4:34 am to Diseasefreeforall
quote:
Under California criminal law, people are responsible for their actions when impaired by alcohol or drugs unless their intoxication was involuntary.
I'm not understanding the ruling here with regard to the above statement. It sounds like she should be help reaponsible. The statement is thrown in there like it's an explanation as to why on this ruling, but to me it seems contradictory. Am I missing something?
Posted on 1/24/24 at 5:54 am to redstick13
quote:
Pics of crazy white woman and her victim.
It’s crazy that in this day, with these particular pictures & without the obvious mugshot, you couldn’t be 100% sure which is which.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 6:03 am to Obtuse1
quote:Completely agree with this.
In the end, I think there is more to the story than what appears on the face but I am very cautious of applying the defense. It is similar to the early days of the "insanity defense". This defense has the added "benefit" of not being confined in a mental institution.
At the same time, MJ nowadays isn’t even remotely comparable to what we even had 20 years ago, and this is in a state where MJ is legal, likely leading to even more potent strains.
I can understand the situation where she was completely paranoid and freaked out, although stabbing someone 108 times is a bit much.
There is likely more to this.
This post was edited on 1/24/24 at 6:07 am
Posted on 1/24/24 at 6:07 am to Epaminondas
quote:
How does smoking weed cause a person to completely lose their mind and go on a murderous rampage?
It doesn't.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 6:08 am to billjamin
quote:
Being an attractive white chick is the ultimate life hack.
This is why feminism gaslights you so much with "white male privilege."
Its pure projection.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 6:11 am to Obtuse1
quote:
I am quite dubious but do accept being bullied into dangerous amounts of alcohol is a not unheard of situation.
This is not involuntary that would be if someone spiked your drink
Feeling peer pressure and succumbing is still a voluntary act
Posted on 1/24/24 at 6:42 am to Diseasefreeforall
This makes zero sense. If you get drunk and kill someone, you can’t blame it on the alcohol. You’re going to prison for a long time.
How is this any different at all?
How is this any different at all?
Posted on 1/24/24 at 6:46 am to Diseasefreeforall
I never expected a reefer madness defense would work
Posted on 1/24/24 at 6:59 am to DanglingFury
quote:
How does anyone smoke weed, and have the energy to do anything 108 times?
Sativas...
Posted on 1/24/24 at 7:34 am to Scuttle But
Oh please get over that. Come work with me in the fields at harvest. You will mostly see white and hispanic guys. But there are lots of white women getting it done in the sheeyit conditions.
However I have NEVER seen a certain American woman ever in the fields or working cattle.
But this ain’t about “white privileged nonsensical feel gooderie”.
This is about giving little girls Big Pharma drugs that change her sex. She was obviously getting some form of testosterone. That’s not the neck of a young girl. Giving young girls massive doses of male hormones will produce homicidal rage.
However I have NEVER seen a certain American woman ever in the fields or working cattle.
But this ain’t about “white privileged nonsensical feel gooderie”.
This is about giving little girls Big Pharma drugs that change her sex. She was obviously getting some form of testosterone. That’s not the neck of a young girl. Giving young girls massive doses of male hormones will produce homicidal rage.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 7:35 am to lsuson
quote:
Bet the judge was ultra liberal. Not surprised
But at the same time, you’d think a liberal would be more likely to have personal experience with the pots and therefore know that it doesn’t make anyone violent
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News