- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Sandy Hook families offer to settle with Alex Jones for millions, not billions
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:03 pm
quote:
Sandy Hook families, awarded up to $1.5 billion in judgments against Alex Jones, could settle for pennies on the dollar: $85 million over 10 years.
On Monday, lawyers for the Sandy Hook victims’ families offered the controversial Infowars host a deal to pay only roughly 6% of the $1.5 billion he owes in exchange for dropping their claim against him.
During a court hearing in Houston, the lawyers offered Jones two choices: Either liquidate his assets and give the proceeds to creditors or pay them at least $8.5 million a year for 10 years — plus 50% of any income over $9 million per year. The compromise was seen as a viable way to help resolve the bankruptcy reorganization cases of both Jones and his corporation, Free Speech Systems.
But Vickie Driver, Jones’s personal bankruptcy lawyer, expressed that the $85 million settlement offer was “unrealistic.”
In a scathing court document, the plaintiffs' attorneys claimed Jones refuses to curb his extravagant lifestyle and preserve the value of his holdings and has yet to sell his assets. According to court papers dated Aug. 29, Jones spent $93,180 in July, including giving more than $15,000 to his wife, $7,900 for “housekeeping,” $6,338 on entertainment and meals, and $3,388 on groceries, and none was on legal fees, CNN reported. Meanwhile, payment to the Sandy Hook families remains frozen.
Twenty children and six educators were killed by a gunman at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012. After the shooting, Jones repeatedly said on his show that the shooting never happened and was staged in an effort to tighten gun laws. Relatives of many of the Sandy Hook victims sued Jones in Connecticut and Texas, winning nearly $1.5 billion in judgments against him. Jones only conceded his extreme theories during the heat of his 2022 defamation trial, saying, "Especially since I've met the parents, it's 100% real."
LINK
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:08 pm to Esquire
quote:Is that illegal?
Would you tell them their kids aren’t really dead?
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:08 pm to GumboPot
Jones is a lunatic and a-hole but don’t understand how he defamed them.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:12 pm to Esquire
quote:Telling someone that their kids arent dead is not defamation though.
Defamation is in fact illegal.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:13 pm to ChexMix
quote:
Telling someone that their kids arent dead is not defamation though.
Calling someone a crisis actor that never had a kid is defamation though.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:14 pm to Esquire
quote:No it is not.
Calling someone a crisis actor that never had a kid is defamation though.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:15 pm to GumboPot
95% off Black Friday Sale
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:16 pm to ChexMix
He didn't just claim that their kids didn't die. He claimed that the parents and children were actors and pretending. This made right wing nut jobs attack these poor people. He defamed them.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:17 pm to RedStickFox
quote:And?
He claimed that the parents and children were actors and pretending
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:18 pm to ChexMix
quote:
Telling someone that their kids arent dead is not defamation though.
Facilitating and encouraging the harassment of the families by calling them liars and actors while knowingly pedaling false information is though.
At least according to the laws of multiple states and the opinions of the various juries who ruled against him.
Wasn’t one of them also a default judgment?
This post was edited on 11/28/23 at 4:19 pm
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:20 pm to Indefatigable
quote:Man, that one has to be hard to prove no? Knowingly. What if Alex believed what he said?
while knowingly pedaling false information
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:20 pm to Esquire
quote:
Calling someone a crisis actor that never had a kid is defamation though
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:20 pm to ChexMix
quote:
No it is not.
DEFAMATION
According to Black’s Law Dictionary, defamation is the act of harming the reputation of
another by making a false statement to a third person.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:21 pm to Esquire
quote:
Would you tell them their kids aren’t really dead?
Jones said bad things and has since apologized. He didn't kill them. He is being sued as though he pulled the trigger.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:22 pm to aggressor
quote:
He is being sued as though he pulled the trigger.
This is factually blatantly incorrect
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:23 pm to ChexMix
quote:
Man, that one has to be hard to prove no? Knowingly. What if Alex believed what he said?
Every finder of fact—judge and/or jury alike— in every case found that he either knew what he was pedaling was false or that he acted with reckless disregard for the truth.
No one believes that he believed what he said.
You don’t get to just lie about people and cause them harm, particularly not as a public figure and definitely not when you know you’re spreading lies.
Popular
Back to top

22







