- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does the Dow finish the year above or below 30k?
Posted on 10/31/23 at 11:49 am to SloaneRanger
Posted on 10/31/23 at 11:49 am to SloaneRanger
Below, Biden’s working to reduce the net worth of the middle class.
Posted on 11/1/23 at 6:36 am to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Really? If it goes down 6%, that'll be super meaningful?
First, let's correct something: per the Dow's closing yesterday, dropping below 30k would require a drop of 8%.
Second, "super meaningful" is your poor interpretation of what I said. It would be another indicator of incoming economic problems. If you consider that "super meaningful" or not is up to you.
Next, the Dow usually goes up from 11/01-01/01. This means that a drop of 6% over the course of that period would be very abnormal.
Now add to this that we're looking at a likely recession starting in Q4 2023 or Q1 2024.
All that taken together, yes. The Dow dropping 8+% during the busiest time of the year with a possible recession looming would indeed mean "there are bigger things to worry about than the Dow."
This post was edited on 11/1/23 at 6:38 am
Posted on 11/1/23 at 8:08 am to Bard
quote:
we're looking at a likely recession starting in Q4 2023 or Q1 2024.
I believe you have been saying this since 2021. You do back a lot of it with data but what does it mean if you have been crying wolf for last few years? Do you figure if you keep saying it that you can eventually say i was right? I'm not saying in 2024 there wont be a recession but you saying it over and over again kind of takes the shine off of your post.
This post was edited on 11/1/23 at 9:56 am
Posted on 11/1/23 at 11:43 am to SloaneRanger
Equal weight SP already took out the March lows. The SPY will eventually once the generals follow the soldiers.
Posted on 11/1/23 at 11:48 am to The Scofflaw
The S&P is just about at the exact same level it was 2.5 years ago.
Posted on 11/1/23 at 3:17 pm to FLObserver
quote:
I believe you have been saying this since 2021. You do back a lot of it with data but what does it mean if you have been crying wolf for last few years? Do you figure if you keep saying it that you can eventually say i was right? I'm not saying in 2024 there wont be a recession but you saying it over and over again kind of takes the shine off of your post.
That's very fair, and I get it. I've posted before (and will many times again
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
I'm willing to listen objectively if someone can see a path forward that leads to Yellen's "soft landing" and wants to take the time and effort to explain it.
Posted on 11/1/23 at 3:50 pm to fallguy_1978
quote:
The S&P is just about at the exact same level it was 2.5 years ago.
Didn’t realize this. Would believe it for the equal weight, but not the main index.
Posted on 11/1/23 at 4:11 pm to Bard
quote:I mean, the S and P just went down ~10% since August 1st. What are we to make of that? Recession? Meaningful negatives?
First, let's correct something: per the Dow's closing yesterday, dropping below 30k would require a drop of 8%.
Second, "super meaningful" is your poor interpretation of what I said. It would be another indicator of incoming economic problems. If you consider that "super meaningful" or not is up to you.
Next, the Dow usually goes up from 11/01-01/01. This means that a drop of 6% over the course of that period would be very abnormal.
Now add to this that we're looking at a likely recession starting in Q4 2023 or Q1 2024.
All that taken together, yes. The Dow dropping 8+% during the busiest time of the year with a possible recession looming would indeed mean "there are bigger things to worry about than the Dow."
I'm just ETA: "not" as confident as you that seemingly random volatility is so clearly telling us anything. I submit that the Dow could easily go down that amount and it essentially be meaningless.
quote:Sure, I was only responding to the numbers you posted, I didn't go check them.
First, let's correct something: per the Dow's closing yesterday, dropping below 30k would require a drop of 8%.
This post was edited on 11/1/23 at 11:52 pm
Posted on 11/1/23 at 7:12 pm to dallastiger55
quote:
If the DOW drops 2800 points in 60 days, something very bad has happened
That’s simply not true.
Posted on 11/1/23 at 7:14 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
I mean, the S and P just went down ~10% since August 1st. What are we to make of that? Recession? Meaningful negatives?
I'm just as confident as you that seemingly random volatility is so clearly telling us anything.
Except that I'm not doing that. I even explained that I would consider it as nothing more than another indicator of upcoming economic problems, but you seem to be hellbent on framing it some other way. It's concerning that my giving of such a benign answer seems to have triggered you like a Gazan getting a Menorah as a Christmas gift.
Do you a hug? Maybe an intervention?
This post was edited on 11/1/23 at 7:22 pm
Posted on 11/1/23 at 11:55 pm to Bard
quote:Wait what? You said it would be a terrible harbinger if the Dow were down 6% in 2 months. (You've since clarified 8%, but at the time you said going from 32K to 30K, so I just did the math on that - as I don't track the Dow at all ever.)
Except that I'm not doing that. I even explained that I would consider it as nothing more than another indicator of upcoming economic problems, but you seem to be hellbent on framing it some other way. It's concerning that my giving of such a benign answer seems to have triggered you like a Gazan getting a Menorah as a Christmas gift.
Do you a hug? Maybe an intervention?
I'm not triggered, I'm merely saying I'm confused about where you are deriving such certainty of meaning about such a mundane move in an equity index over not that short a period of time. I'm also saying I don't agree with that view point.
What am I mis-framing? Maybe 8% would get my attention a little more, but 6% is just random noise in my world.
I would submit that you see a recession signal around every corner. That's fine, I've been there before.
Posted on 11/2/23 at 12:11 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
What am I mis-framing?
quote:
You said it would be a terrible harbinger
I've explained it twice now how that is not what I stated. That you keep sticking to it denotes some sort of strange obsession with me more than just a simple disagreement. If you continue to to stick to that stance... well, that's a "you" problem.
quote:
I would submit that you see a recession signal around every corner.
There's no one signal but rather looking at multiple indicators and taking them in context. As I stated to FLO, I am all ears to hear how someone (like yourself, I guess) sees us not going through a recession in the coming months.
Posted on 11/2/23 at 1:12 pm to SloaneRanger
Maybe we should discuss if the DOW will end the year above or below 34,000.
Posted on 11/3/23 at 12:10 pm to Bard
OK, sounds like wires are crossed here. Here is exactly what you said:
It really doesn't seem like I'm exaggerating what you were implying here, but...I guess I am? I mean, I do agree that - almost by definition - we ALWAYS have "far bigger things to worry about" than random market noise. But I don't think that's what you meant?
A recession is certainly possible. As I've said, I was definitely expecting worse things to happen WAY before now. But I think you are off on some of your (personal) debt analysis. Median, real net worth is up a lot in the past few years, blunting the effects of inflation.
It would not surprise me at all if we had a soft (or no) landing.
On the other side of it, I am seeing some pretty severe weakness in multifamily - but not from the standpoint of occupancy...rather, from the standpoint of bad owners who bought at the peak with massive leverage. So, I think there's going to be a lot of bloodletting as the distressed guys (me) move in for the kill. But there is A LOT of cash sitting in PE funds on the sidelines for such things, so my bigger worry is that the distress won't be nearly as bad as I am hoping for.
This is true in corporate credit as well. People seem to like to point to the levered loan market and say "disaster coming!". But, even better fundamentals there. No maturity wall to speak of until at least 2025. And any companies facing real headwinds - there's literally $1 trillion+ of PE money standing by to shore these cos up.
etc.
TL;DR - I can see asset price difficulties (opportunities) - but that's more a capital structure problem than an actual economic problem.
quote:
If it drops below 30k by the end of this year, there will be far bigger things to worry about than the Dow.
It really doesn't seem like I'm exaggerating what you were implying here, but...I guess I am? I mean, I do agree that - almost by definition - we ALWAYS have "far bigger things to worry about" than random market noise. But I don't think that's what you meant?
quote:Coming months? That's awfully broad. Care to dial that in some?
There's no one signal but rather looking at multiple indicators and taking them in context. As I stated to FLO, I am all ears to hear how someone (like yourself, I guess) sees us not going through a recession in the coming months.
A recession is certainly possible. As I've said, I was definitely expecting worse things to happen WAY before now. But I think you are off on some of your (personal) debt analysis. Median, real net worth is up a lot in the past few years, blunting the effects of inflation.
It would not surprise me at all if we had a soft (or no) landing.
On the other side of it, I am seeing some pretty severe weakness in multifamily - but not from the standpoint of occupancy...rather, from the standpoint of bad owners who bought at the peak with massive leverage. So, I think there's going to be a lot of bloodletting as the distressed guys (me) move in for the kill. But there is A LOT of cash sitting in PE funds on the sidelines for such things, so my bigger worry is that the distress won't be nearly as bad as I am hoping for.
This is true in corporate credit as well. People seem to like to point to the levered loan market and say "disaster coming!". But, even better fundamentals there. No maturity wall to speak of until at least 2025. And any companies facing real headwinds - there's literally $1 trillion+ of PE money standing by to shore these cos up.
etc.
TL;DR - I can see asset price difficulties (opportunities) - but that's more a capital structure problem than an actual economic problem.
Posted on 11/14/23 at 8:37 am to SloaneRanger
I’m thinking above 35,000 is a good bet. LOL
Posted on 11/14/23 at 8:43 am to notiger1997
Oh my goodness! Scrolling thru my Ric Flair .gifs ![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)