The ultimate argument to "diversity is our strength"

Whose alter are you

Looks like the sycophants favorite choice for VP loves playing the same race baiting "victim" as the left.

You should be able to do better than sound like a 2-yr old.

quote:

---

You should be able to do better than sound like a 2-yr old.

---

i can argue in very simple terms "why" diversity is not necessarily a strength. my point is that the "diversity is our strength" crowd cannot. but yes, point taken.

for instance, when i am told that forcing women into the infantry in the Marine Corps is actually making our infantry stronger, i can very simply explain that on a macro scale women are physically smaller, slower, and weaker than men and that makes them objectively worse at fighting.

but if someone is arguing FOR women in the infantry, and they say that "diversity of gender makes the infantry stronger", i can just reply "why?" and watch them implode.

You just posted about whites need to be worried about not being the super majority. Stop trying to start race arguments. If you think all people that look alike think the same you're a moron.

Diversity, in and of itself, is not a bad thing. Yes, the USA was founded and started largely by WASP. But over the course of (nearly) 250 years a lot of different people from a lot of different places helped build it into the greatest country known to man.

However, forced "diversity" simply for the sake of diversity IS a bad thing. Many times people are forced into roles they simply aren't suited to perform based on nothing more than superficial traits such as gender, skin color, sexual orientation, etc that have NOTHING to do with merit or ability. For the employer it results in inefficiency, higher costs, and poorer work that trickles down to the rest of society. For the employee, it results in failure, a lack of growth, feelings of inferiority, and lack of respect because they can't do the job/work.

The country has changed a lot over the past several decades. While forced integration may have been somewhat necessary at some point, it isn't now. Very few companies are going to pass on a highly qualified woman, or black man, or gay man who can produce big time results/profits for the company in favor of a useless white male. I'm sure every single one of us has worked with someone who would be considered on the "diversity" specter who was excellent in their role and thus, had the respect of everyone they associated with, regardless of skin color or gender. But forcing someone into a role they can't perform simply because they fit the right diversity category doesn't help anyone. The job won't get done well and no one will respect the employee because of it.

quote:

---

Stop trying to start race arguments

---

Why?

quote:

---

Why?

---

Because they’re divisive and unproductive. Go away troll

You seem to think our (the US)'s cultural and racial diversity is a problem? If so, how would you go about solving it?